COVID-19 Vaccines: Characterizing Misinformation Campaigns and Vaccine Hesitancy on Twitter

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2106.08423v1
• Date: Tue, 15 Jun 2021 20:32:10 GMT
• Title: COVID-19 Vaccines: Characterizing Misinformation Campaigns and Vaccine Hesitancy on Twitter
• Authors: Karishma Sharma, Yizhou Zhang, Yan Liu
• Abstract summary: We investigate misinformation and conspiracy campaigns and their characteristic behaviours for COVID-19 vaccines. We identify whether coordinated efforts are used to promote misinformation in vaccine related discussions. We study the large anti-vaccine misinformation community and smaller anti-vaccine communities, including a far-right anti-vaccine conspiracy group.
• Score: 8.181808709549227
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: Vaccine hesitancy and misinformation on social media has increased concerns about COVID-19 vaccine uptake required to achieve herd immunity and overcome the pandemic. However anti-science and political misinformation and conspiracies have been rampant throughout the pandemic. For COVID-19 vaccines, we investigate misinformation and conspiracy campaigns and their characteristic behaviours. We identify whether coordinated efforts are used to promote misinformation in vaccine related discussions, and find accounts coordinately promoting a `Great Reset' conspiracy group promoting vaccine related misinformation and strong anti-vaccine and anti-social messages such as boycott vaccine passports, no lock-downs and masks. We characterize other misinformation communities from the information diffusion structure, and study the large anti-vaccine misinformation community and smaller anti-vaccine communities, including a far-right anti-vaccine conspiracy group. In comparison with the mainstream and health news, left-leaning group, which are more pro-vaccine, the right-leaning group is influenced more by the anti-vaccine and far-right misinformation/conspiracy communities. The misinformation communities are more vocal either specific to the vaccine discussion or political discussion, and we find other differences in the characteristic behaviours of different communities. Lastly, we investigate misinformation narratives and tactics of information distortion that can increase vaccine hesitancy, using topic modeling and comparison with reported vaccine side-effects (VAERS) finding rarer side-effects are more frequently discussed on social media.

Related papers

• Effects of Antivaccine Tweets on COVID-19 Vaccinations, Cases, and Deaths [2.190432422548697]
  We present a compartmental epidemic model that includes vaccination, vaccine hesitancy, and exposure to antivaccine content. We find that exposure to antivaccine content on Twitter caused 750,000 people to refuse vaccination between February and August 2021 in the US. Our findings should inform social media moderation policy as well as public health interventions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-13T14:11:02Z)
• How COVID-19 has Impacted the Anti-Vaccine Discourse: A Large-Scale Twitter Study Spanning Pre-COVID and Post-COVID Era [23.47622466879736]
  The COVID-19 pandemic showed how crucial it is to understand and mitigate anti-vaccine sentiments. This study attempts to answer these questions through a large-scale study of anti-vaccine posts on Twitter. We propose two novel methods for classifying tweets into 11 different anti-vax concerns.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-04-02T06:18:41Z)
• Modeling the amplification of epidemic spread by misinformed populations [41.31724592098777]
  We employ an epidemic model that incorporates a large, mobility-informed physical contact network as well as the distribution of misinformed individuals across counties derived from social media data. We present a worst-case scenario in which a heavily misinformed population would result in an additional 14% of the U.S. population becoming infected over the course of the COVID-19 epidemic.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-17T18:01:43Z)
• Dense Feature Memory Augmented Transformers for COVID-19 Vaccination Search Classification [60.49594822215981]
  This paper presents a classification model for detecting COVID-19 vaccination related search queries. We propose a novel approach of considering dense features as memory tokens that the model can attend to. We show that this new modeling approach enables a significant improvement to the Vaccine Search Insights (VSI) task.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-12-16T13:57:41Z)
• Doctors vs. Nurses: Understanding the Great Divide in Vaccine Hesitancy among Healthcare Workers [64.1526243118151]
  We find that doctors are overall more positive toward the COVID-19 vaccines. Doctors are more concerned with the effectiveness of the vaccines over newer variants. Nurses pay more attention to the potential side effects on children.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-09-11T14:22:16Z)
• "COVID-19 was a FIFA conspiracy #curropt": An Investigation into the Viral Spread of COVID-19 Misinformation [60.268682953952506]
  We estimate the extent to which misinformation has influenced the course of the COVID-19 pandemic using natural language processing models. We provide a strategy to combat social media posts that are likely to cause widespread harm.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-06-12T19:41:01Z)
• VaccineLies: A Natural Language Resource for Learning to Recognize Misinformation about the COVID-19 and HPV Vaccines [0.0]
  VaccineLies is a collection of tweets propagating misinformation about two vaccines: the COVID-19 vaccines and the Human Papillomavirus (HPV) vaccines. The ability to automatically recognize misinformation targeting vaccines on Twitter depends on the availability of data resources.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-02-18T22:09:38Z)
• Winds of Change: Impact of COVID-19 on Vaccine-related Opinions of Twitter users [19.08902619892565]
  Administering COVID-19 vaccines at a societal scale has been deemed as the most appropriate way to defend against the COVID-19 pandemic. This global vaccination drive naturally fueled a possibility of Pro-Vaxxers and Anti-Vaxxers strongly expressing their supports and concerns regarding the vaccines on social media platforms. The goal of this work is to improve this understanding using the lens of Twitter-discourse data.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-11-20T19:33:51Z)
• Sentiment Analysis and Topic Modeling for COVID-19 Vaccine Discussions [10.194753795363667]
  We conduct an in-depth analysis of tweets related to the coronavirus vaccine on Twitter. Results show that a majority of people are confident in the effectiveness of vaccines and are willing to get vaccinated. Negative tweets are often associated with the complaints of vaccine shortages, side effects after injections and possible death after being vaccinated.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-10-08T23:30:17Z)
• The illicit trade of COVID-19 vaccines on the dark web [55.45786602961871]
  Early analyses revealed that dark web marketplaces (DWMs) started offering COVID-19 related products (e.g., masks and COVID-19 tests) as soon as the COVID-19 pandemic started. Here, we broaden the scope and depth of previous investigations by analysing 194 DWMs until July 2021, including the crucial period in which vaccines became available. We show that recreational drugs are the most affected among traditional DWMs product, with COVID-19 mentions steadily increasing since March 2020.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-02-10T14:52:54Z)
• Falling into the Echo Chamber: the Italian Vaccination Debate on Twitter [65.7192861893042]
  We examine the extent to which the vaccination debate on Twitter is conductive to potential outreach to the vaccination hesitant. We discover that the vaccination skeptics, as well as the advocates, reside in their own distinct "echo chambers" At the center of these echo chambers we find the ardent supporters, for which we build highly accurate network- and content-based classifiers.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-03-26T13:55:50Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.