Non-parametric Differentially Private Confidence Intervals for the Median

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2106.10333v1
• Date: Fri, 18 Jun 2021 19:45:37 GMT
• Title: Non-parametric Differentially Private Confidence Intervals for the Median
• Authors: Joerg Drechsler, Ira Globus-Harris, Audra McMillan, Jayshree Sarathy, and Adam Smith
• Abstract summary: This paper proposes and evaluates several strategies to compute valid differentially private confidence intervals for the median. We also illustrate that addressing both sources of uncertainty--the error from sampling and the error from protecting the output--should be preferred over simpler approaches that incorporate the uncertainty in a sequential fashion.
• Score: 3.205141100055992
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: Differential privacy is a restriction on data processing algorithms that provides strong confidentiality guarantees for individual records in the data. However, research on proper statistical inference, that is, research on properly quantifying the uncertainty of the (noisy) sample estimate regarding the true value in the population, is currently still limited. This paper proposes and evaluates several strategies to compute valid differentially private confidence intervals for the median. Instead of computing a differentially private point estimate and deriving its uncertainty, we directly estimate the interval bounds and discuss why this approach is superior if ensuring privacy is important. We also illustrate that addressing both sources of uncertainty--the error from sampling and the error from protecting the output--simultaneously should be preferred over simpler approaches that incorporate the uncertainty in a sequential fashion. We evaluate the performance of the different algorithms under various parameter settings in extensive simulation studies and demonstrate how the findings could be applied in practical settings using data from the 1940 Decennial Census.

Related papers

• Differentially Private Covariate Balancing Causal Inference [8.133739801185271]
  Differential privacy is the leading mathematical framework for privacy protection. Our algorithm produces both point and interval estimators with statistical guarantees, such as consistency and rate optimality, under a given privacy budget.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-18T18:02:13Z)
• Stratified Prediction-Powered Inference for Hybrid Language Model Evaluation [62.2436697657307]
  Prediction-powered inference (PPI) is a method that improves statistical estimates based on limited human-labeled data. We propose a method called Stratified Prediction-Powered Inference (StratPPI) We show that the basic PPI estimates can be considerably improved by employing simple data stratification strategies.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-06T17:37:39Z)
• Differentially Private Federated Learning: Servers Trustworthiness, Estimation, and Statistical Inference [18.97060758177909]
  This paper investigates the challenges of high-dimensional estimation and inference under the constraints of differential privacy. We introduce a novel federated estimation algorithm tailored for linear regression models. We also propose methods for statistical inference, including coordinate-wise confidence intervals for individual parameters.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-04-25T02:14:07Z)
• One step closer to unbiased aleatoric uncertainty estimation [71.55174353766289]
  We propose a new estimation method by actively de-noising the observed data. By conducting a broad range of experiments, we demonstrate that our proposed approach provides a much closer approximation to the actual data uncertainty than the standard method.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-12-16T14:59:11Z)
• Simulation-based, Finite-sample Inference for Privatized Data [14.218697973204065]
  We propose a simulation-based "repro sample" approach to produce statistically valid confidence intervals and hypothesis tests. We show that this methodology is applicable to a wide variety of private inference problems.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-03-09T15:19:31Z)
• Differentially Private Confidence Intervals for Proportions under Stratified Random Sampling [14.066813980992132]
  With the increase of data privacy awareness, developing a private version of confidence intervals has gained growing attention. Recent work has been done around differentially private confidence intervals, yet rigorous methodologies on differentially private confidence intervals have not been studied. We propose three differentially private algorithms for constructing confidence intervals for proportions under stratified random sampling.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-01-19T21:25:41Z)
• A Unified Approach to Differentially Private Bayes Point Estimation [7.599399338954307]
  emphdifferential privacy (DP) has been proposed, which enforces confidentiality by introducing randomization in the estimates. Standard algorithms for differentially private estimation are based on adding an appropriate amount of noise to the output of a traditional point estimation method. We propose a new Unified Bayes Private Point (UBaPP) approach to Bayes point estimation of the unknown parameters of a data generating mechanism under a DP constraint.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-11-18T16:42:49Z)
• Debugging Differential Privacy: A Case Study for Privacy Auditing [60.87570714269048]
  We show that auditing can also be used to find flaws in (purportedly) differentially private schemes. In this case study, we audit a recent open source implementation of a differentially private deep learning algorithm and find, with 99.99999999% confidence, that the implementation does not satisfy the claimed differential privacy guarantee.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-02-24T17:31:08Z)
• Quantifying Uncertainty in Deep Spatiotemporal Forecasting [67.77102283276409]
  We describe two types of forecasting problems: regular grid-based and graph-based. We analyze UQ methods from both the Bayesian and the frequentist point view, casting in a unified framework via statistical decision theory. Through extensive experiments on real-world road network traffic, epidemics, and air quality forecasting tasks, we reveal the statistical computational trade-offs for different UQ methods.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-05-25T14:35:46Z)
• CoinDICE: Off-Policy Confidence Interval Estimation [107.86876722777535]
  We study high-confidence behavior-agnostic off-policy evaluation in reinforcement learning. We show in a variety of benchmarks that the confidence interval estimates are tighter and more accurate than existing methods.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-10-22T12:39:11Z)
• Privacy Preserving Recalibration under Domain Shift [119.21243107946555]
  We introduce a framework that abstracts out the properties of recalibration problems under differential privacy constraints. We also design a novel recalibration algorithm, accuracy temperature scaling, that outperforms prior work on private datasets.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-08-21T18:43:37Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.