Effective Evaluation of Deep Active Learning on Image Classification Tasks

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2106.15324v2
• Date: Wed, 30 Jun 2021 04:49:40 GMT
• Title: Effective Evaluation of Deep Active Learning on Image Classification Tasks
• Authors: Nathan Beck, Durga Sivasubramanian, Apurva Dani, Ganesh Ramakrishnan, Rishabh Iyer
• Abstract summary: We present a unified re-implementation of state-of-the-art active learning algorithms in the context of image classification. On the positive side, we show that AL techniques are 2x to 4x more label-efficient compared to RS with the use of data augmentation.
• Score: 10.27095298129151
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/
• Abstract: With the goal of making deep learning more label-efficient, a growing number of papers have been studying active learning (AL) for deep models. However, there are a number of issues in the prevalent experimental settings, mainly stemming from a lack of unified implementation and benchmarking. Issues in the current literature include sometimes contradictory observations on the performance of different AL algorithms, unintended exclusion of important generalization approaches such as data augmentation and SGD for optimization, a lack of study of evaluation facets like the labeling efficiency of AL, and little or no clarity on the scenarios in which AL outperforms random sampling (RS). In this work, we present a unified re-implementation of state-of-the-art AL algorithms in the context of image classification, and we carefully study these issues as facets of effective evaluation. On the positive side, we show that AL techniques are 2x to 4x more label-efficient compared to RS with the use of data augmentation. Surprisingly, when data augmentation is included, there is no longer a consistent gain in using BADGE, a state-of-the-art approach, over simple uncertainty sampling. We then do a careful analysis of how existing approaches perform with varying amounts of redundancy and number of examples per class. Finally, we provide several insights for AL practitioners to consider in future work, such as the effect of the AL batch size, the effect of initialization, the importance of retraining a new model at every round, and other insights.

Related papers

• LPLgrad: Optimizing Active Learning Through Gradient Norm Sample Selection and Auxiliary Model Training [2.762397703396293]
  Loss Prediction Loss with Gradient Norm (LPLgrad) is designed to quantify model uncertainty effectively and improve the accuracy of image classification tasks. LPLgrad operates in two distinct phases: (i) em Training Phase aims to predict the loss for input features by jointly training a main model and an auxiliary model. This dual-model approach enhances the ability to extract complex input features and learn intrinsic patterns from the data effectively.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-11-20T18:12:59Z)
• Active Learning Principles for In-Context Learning with Large Language Models [65.09970281795769]
  This paper investigates how Active Learning algorithms can serve as effective demonstration selection methods for in-context learning. We show that in-context example selection through AL prioritizes high-quality examples that exhibit low uncertainty and bear similarity to the test examples.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-05-23T17:16:04Z)
• Navigating the Pitfalls of Active Learning Evaluation: A Systematic Framework for Meaningful Performance Assessment [3.3064235071867856]
  Active Learning (AL) aims to reduce the labeling burden by interactively selecting the most informative samples from a pool of unlabeled data. Some studies have questioned the effectiveness of AL compared to emerging paradigms such as semi-supervised (Semi-SL) and self-supervised learning (Self-SL)
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-01-25T15:07:44Z)
• Active Learning for Abstractive Text Summarization [50.79416783266641]
  We propose the first effective query strategy for Active Learning in abstractive text summarization. We show that using our strategy in AL annotation helps to improve the model performance in terms of ROUGE and consistency scores.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-01-09T10:33:14Z)
• Smooth Sailing: Improving Active Learning for Pre-trained Language Models with Representation Smoothness Analysis [3.490038106567192]
  Active learning (AL) methods aim to reduce label complexity in supervised learning. We propose an early stopping technique that does not require a validation set. We find that task adaptation improves AL, whereas standard short fine-tuning in AL does not provide improvements over random sampling.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-12-20T19:37:20Z)
• Margin-based sampling in high dimensions: When being active is less efficient than staying passive [76.71565772067113]
  Recent empirical evidence suggests that margin-based active learning can sometimes perform even worse than passive learning. We prove for logistic regression that PL outperforms margin-based AL even for noiseless data. Insights from our proof indicate that this high-dimensional phenomenon is exacerbated when the separation between the classes is small.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-12-01T18:55:59Z)
• Improved Algorithms for Neural Active Learning [74.89097665112621]
  We improve the theoretical and empirical performance of neural-network(NN)-based active learning algorithms for the non-parametric streaming setting. We introduce two regret metrics by minimizing the population loss that are more suitable in active learning than the one used in state-of-the-art (SOTA) related work.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-10-02T05:03:38Z)
• Towards Diverse Evaluation of Class Incremental Learning: A Representation Learning Perspective [67.45111837188685]
  Class incremental learning (CIL) algorithms aim to continually learn new object classes from incrementally arriving data. We experimentally analyze neural network models trained by CIL algorithms using various evaluation protocols in representation learning.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-06-16T11:44:11Z)
• Active learning for reducing labeling effort in text classification tasks [3.8424737607413153]
  Active learning (AL) is a paradigm that aims to reduce labeling effort by only using the data which the used model deems most informative. We present an empirical study that compares different uncertainty-based algorithms BERT$_base$ as the used classifiers. Our results show that using uncertainty-based AL with BERT$base$ outperforms random sampling of data.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-09-10T13:00:36Z)
• Can Active Learning Preemptively Mitigate Fairness Issues? [66.84854430781097]
  dataset bias is one of the prevailing causes of unfairness in machine learning. We study whether models trained with uncertainty-based ALs are fairer in their decisions with respect to a protected class. We also explore the interaction of algorithmic fairness methods such as gradient reversal (GRAD) and BALD.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-04-14T14:20:22Z)
• Ask-n-Learn: Active Learning via Reliable Gradient Representations for Image Classification [29.43017692274488]
  Deep predictive models rely on human supervision in the form of labeled training data. We propose Ask-n-Learn, an active learning approach based on gradient embeddings obtained using the pesudo-labels estimated in each of the algorithm.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-09-30T05:19:56Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.