Navigating the Pitfalls of Active Learning Evaluation: A Systematic Framework for Meaningful Performance Assessment

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2301.10625v3
• Date: Fri, 3 Nov 2023 16:35:14 GMT
• Title: Navigating the Pitfalls of Active Learning Evaluation: A Systematic Framework for Meaningful Performance Assessment
• Authors: Carsten T. L\"uth, Till J. Bungert, Lukas Klein, Paul F. Jaeger
• Abstract summary: Active Learning (AL) aims to reduce the labeling burden by interactively selecting the most informative samples from a pool of unlabeled data. Some studies have questioned the effectiveness of AL compared to emerging paradigms such as semi-supervised (Semi-SL) and self-supervised learning (Self-SL)
• Score: 3.3064235071867856
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: Active Learning (AL) aims to reduce the labeling burden by interactively selecting the most informative samples from a pool of unlabeled data. While there has been extensive research on improving AL query methods in recent years, some studies have questioned the effectiveness of AL compared to emerging paradigms such as semi-supervised (Semi-SL) and self-supervised learning (Self-SL), or a simple optimization of classifier configurations. Thus, today's AL literature presents an inconsistent and contradictory landscape, leaving practitioners uncertain about whether and how to use AL in their tasks. In this work, we make the case that this inconsistency arises from a lack of systematic and realistic evaluation of AL methods. Specifically, we identify five key pitfalls in the current literature that reflect the delicate considerations required for AL evaluation. Further, we present an evaluation framework that overcomes these pitfalls and thus enables meaningful statements about the performance of AL methods. To demonstrate the relevance of our protocol, we present a large-scale empirical study and benchmark for image classification spanning various data sets, query methods, AL settings, and training paradigms. Our findings clarify the inconsistent picture in the literature and enable us to give hands-on recommendations for practitioners. The benchmark is hosted at https://github.com/IML-DKFZ/realistic-al .

Related papers

• Evaluating Human Alignment and Model Faithfulness of LLM Rationale [66.75309523854476]
  We study how well large language models (LLMs) explain their generations through rationales. We show that prompting-based methods are less "faithful" than attribution-based explanations.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-28T20:06:30Z)
• C-ICL: Contrastive In-context Learning for Information Extraction [54.39470114243744]
  c-ICL is a novel few-shot technique that leverages both correct and incorrect sample constructions to create in-context learning demonstrations. Our experiments on various datasets indicate that c-ICL outperforms previous few-shot in-context learning methods.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-17T11:28:08Z)
• MyriadAL: Active Few Shot Learning for Histopathology [10.652626309100889]
  We introduce an active few shot learning framework, Myriad Active Learning (MAL) MAL includes a contrastive-learning encoder, pseudo-label generation, and novel query sample selection in the loop. Experiments on two public histopathology datasets show that MAL has superior test accuracy, macro F1-score, and label efficiency compared to prior works.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-24T20:08:15Z)
• ALE: A Simulation-Based Active Learning Evaluation Framework for the Parameter-Driven Comparison of Query Strategies for NLP [3.024761040393842]
  Active Learning (AL) proposes promising data points to annotators they annotate next instead of a subsequent or random sample. This method is supposed to save annotation effort while maintaining model performance. We introduce a reproducible active learning evaluation framework for the comparative evaluation of AL strategies in NLP.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-08-01T10:42:11Z)
• Active Learning Principles for In-Context Learning with Large Language Models [65.09970281795769]
  This paper investigates how Active Learning algorithms can serve as effective demonstration selection methods for in-context learning. We show that in-context example selection through AL prioritizes high-quality examples that exhibit low uncertainty and bear similarity to the test examples.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-05-23T17:16:04Z)
• Active Learning for Abstractive Text Summarization [50.79416783266641]
  We propose the first effective query strategy for Active Learning in abstractive text summarization. We show that using our strategy in AL annotation helps to improve the model performance in terms of ROUGE and consistency scores.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-01-09T10:33:14Z)
• Smooth Sailing: Improving Active Learning for Pre-trained Language Models with Representation Smoothness Analysis [3.490038106567192]
  Active learning (AL) methods aim to reduce label complexity in supervised learning. We propose an early stopping technique that does not require a validation set. We find that task adaptation improves AL, whereas standard short fine-tuning in AL does not provide improvements over random sampling.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-12-20T19:37:20Z)
• Meta Objective Guided Disambiguation for Partial Label Learning [44.05801303440139]
  We propose a novel framework for partial label learning with meta objective guided disambiguation (MoGD) MoGD aims to recover the ground-truth label from candidate labels set by solving a meta objective on a small validation set. The proposed method can be easily implemented by using various deep networks with the ordinary SGD.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-08-26T06:48:01Z)
• Effective Evaluation of Deep Active Learning on Image Classification Tasks [10.27095298129151]
  We present a unified re-implementation of state-of-the-art active learning algorithms in the context of image classification. On the positive side, we show that AL techniques are 2x to 4x more label-efficient compared to RS with the use of data augmentation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-06-16T23:29:39Z)
• Can Active Learning Preemptively Mitigate Fairness Issues? [66.84854430781097]
  dataset bias is one of the prevailing causes of unfairness in machine learning. We study whether models trained with uncertainty-based ALs are fairer in their decisions with respect to a protected class. We also explore the interaction of algorithmic fairness methods such as gradient reversal (GRAD) and BALD.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-04-14T14:20:22Z)
• Multitask Learning for Class-Imbalanced Discourse Classification [74.41900374452472]
  We show that a multitask approach can improve 7% Micro F1-score upon current state-of-the-art benchmarks. We also offer a comparative review of additional techniques proposed to address resource-poor problems in NLP.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-01-02T07:13:41Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.