Leveraging Clinical Context for User-Centered Explainability: A Diabetes Use Case

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2107.02359v2
• Date: Wed, 7 Jul 2021 01:19:16 GMT
• Title: Leveraging Clinical Context for User-Centered Explainability: A Diabetes Use Case
• Authors: Shruthi Chari, Prithwish Chakraborty, Mohamed Ghalwash, Oshani Seneviratne, Elif K. Eyigoz, Daniel M. Gruen, Ching-Hua Chen, Pablo Meyer Rojas, Deborah L. McGuinness
• Abstract summary: We implement a proof-of-concept (POC) in type-2 diabetes (T2DM) use case where we assess the risk of chronic kidney disease (CKD) Within the POC, we include risk prediction models for CKD, post-hoc explainers of the predictions, and other natural-language modules. Our POC approach covers multiple knowledge sources and clinical scenarios, blends knowledge to explain data and predictions to PCPs, and received an enthusiastic response from our medical expert.
• Score: 4.520155732176645
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Academic advances of AI models in high-precision domains, like healthcare, need to be made explainable in order to enhance real-world adoption. Our past studies and ongoing interactions indicate that medical experts can use AI systems with greater trust if there are ways to connect the model inferences about patients to explanations that are tied back to the context of use. Specifically, risk prediction is a complex problem of diagnostic and interventional importance to clinicians wherein they consult different sources to make decisions. To enable the adoption of the ever improving AI risk prediction models in practice, we have begun to explore techniques to contextualize such models along three dimensions of interest: the patients' clinical state, AI predictions about their risk of complications, and algorithmic explanations supporting the predictions. We validate the importance of these dimensions by implementing a proof-of-concept (POC) in type-2 diabetes (T2DM) use case where we assess the risk of chronic kidney disease (CKD) - a common T2DM comorbidity. Within the POC, we include risk prediction models for CKD, post-hoc explainers of the predictions, and other natural-language modules which operationalize domain knowledge and CPGs to provide context. With primary care physicians (PCP) as our end-users, we present our initial results and clinician feedback in this paper. Our POC approach covers multiple knowledge sources and clinical scenarios, blends knowledge to explain data and predictions to PCPs, and received an enthusiastic response from our medical expert.

Related papers

• Reasoning-Enhanced Healthcare Predictions with Knowledge Graph Community Retrieval [61.70489848327436]
  KARE is a novel framework that integrates knowledge graph (KG) community-level retrieval with large language models (LLMs) reasoning. Extensive experiments demonstrate that KARE outperforms leading models by up to 10.8-15.0% on MIMIC-III and 12.6-12.7% on MIMIC-IV for mortality and readmission predictions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-06T18:46:28Z)
• MedDiffusion: Boosting Health Risk Prediction via Diffusion-based Data Augmentation [58.93221876843639]
  This paper introduces a novel, end-to-end diffusion-based risk prediction model, named MedDiffusion. It enhances risk prediction performance by creating synthetic patient data during training to enlarge sample space. It discerns hidden relationships between patient visits using a step-wise attention mechanism, enabling the model to automatically retain the most vital information for generating high-quality data.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-04T01:36:30Z)
• Evaluation of Popular XAI Applied to Clinical Prediction Models: Can They be Trusted? [2.0089256058364358]
  The absence of transparency and explainability hinders the clinical adoption of Machine learning (ML) algorithms. This study evaluates two popular XAI methods used for explaining predictive models in the healthcare context.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-06-21T02:29:30Z)
• Informing clinical assessment by contextualizing post-hoc explanations of risk prediction models in type-2 diabetes [50.8044927215346]
  We consider a comorbidity risk prediction scenario and focus on contexts regarding the patients clinical state. We employ several state-of-the-art LLMs to present contexts around risk prediction model inferences and evaluate their acceptability. Our paper is one of the first end-to-end analyses identifying the feasibility and benefits of contextual explanations in a real-world clinical use case.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-02-11T18:07:11Z)
• Can Current Explainability Help Provide References in Clinical Notes to Support Humans Annotate Medical Codes? [53.45585591262433]
  We present an explainable Read, Attend, and Code (xRAC) framework and assess two approaches, attention score-based xRAC-ATTN and model-agnostic knowledge-distillation-based xRAC-KD. We find that the supporting evidence text highlighted by xRAC-ATTN is of higher quality than xRAC-KD whereas xRAC-KD has potential advantages in production deployment scenarios.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-10-28T04:06:07Z)
• Clinically-Inspired Multi-Agent Transformers for Disease Trajectory Forecasting from Multimodal Data [13.766035805437847]
  We formulate the prognosis prediction problem as a one-to-many prediction problem. Inspired by a clinical decision-making process with two agents, we predict prognosis with two transformer-based components. We show the effectiveness of our approach in predicting the development of structural knee osteoarthritis changes and forecasting Alzheimer's disease clinical status directly from raw multi-modal data.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-10-25T10:16:42Z)
• Boosting the interpretability of clinical risk scores with intervention predictions [59.22442473992704]
  We propose a joint model of intervention policy and adverse event risk as a means to explicitly communicate the model's assumptions about future interventions. We show how combining typical risk scores, such as the likelihood of mortality, with future intervention probability scores leads to more interpretable clinical predictions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-07-06T19:49:42Z)
• Label-dependent and event-guided interpretable disease risk prediction using EHRs [8.854691034104071]
  This paper proposes a label-dependent and event-guided risk prediction model (LERP) to predict the presence of multiple disease risks. We adopt a label-dependent mechanism that gives greater attention to words from medical notes that are semantically similar to the names of risk labels. As the clinical events can also indicate the health status of patients, our model utilizes the information from events to generate an event-guided representation of medical notes.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-01-18T07:24:28Z)
• Clinical Outcome Prediction from Admission Notes using Self-Supervised Knowledge Integration [55.88616573143478]
  Outcome prediction from clinical text can prevent doctors from overlooking possible risks. Diagnoses at discharge, procedures performed, in-hospital mortality and length-of-stay prediction are four common outcome prediction targets. We propose clinical outcome pre-training to integrate knowledge about patient outcomes from multiple public sources.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-02-08T10:26:44Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.