Relational Quantum Mechanics and the PBR Theorem: A Peaceful Coexistence

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2107.02566v1
• Date: Tue, 6 Jul 2021 12:09:07 GMT
• Title: Relational Quantum Mechanics and the PBR Theorem: A Peaceful Coexistence
• Authors: Andrea Oldofredi, Claudio Calosi
• Abstract summary: According to Quantum Mechanics the function wave $psi$ is neither a concrete physical item evolving in spacetime nor an object representing the absolute state of a certain system. This paper argues that RQM is not affected by the conclusions of PBR's argument.
• Score: 0.0
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: According to Relational Quantum Mechanics (RQM) the wave function $\psi$ is considered neither a concrete physical item evolving in spacetime, nor an object representing the absolute state of a certain quantum system. In this interpretative framework, $\psi$ is defined as a computational device encoding observers' information; hence, RQM offers a somewhat epistemic view of the wave function. This perspective seems to be at odds with the PBR theorem, a formal result excluding that wave functions represent knowledge of an underlying reality described by some ontic state. In this paper we argue that RQM is not affected by the conclusions of PBR's argument; consequently, the alleged inconsistency can be dissolved. To do that, we will thoroughly discuss the very foundations of the PBR theorem, i.e. Harrigan and Spekkens' categorization of ontological models, showing that their implicit assumptions about the nature of the ontic state are incompatible with the main tenets of RQM. Then, we will ask whether it is possible to derive a relational PBR-type result, answering in the negative. This conclusion shows some limitations of this theorem not yet discussed in the literature.

Related papers

• PBR, nonreality and entangled measurement [0.0]
  Cabbolet argues that the PBR theorem is nonreal since in the ensemble interpretation of quantum mechanics the entangled measurement used in the derivation of the PBR theorem is nonexisting. He doesn't show why it is more reasonable to abandon entangled measurements instead of $psi$-epistemic models. Hence, the PBR theorem remains intact.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-05-10T15:15:04Z)
• Testing trajectory-based determinism via time probability distributions [44.99833362998488]
  Bohmian mechanics (BM) has inherited more predictive power than quantum mechanics (QM) We introduce a prescription for constructing a flight-time probability distribution within generic trajectory-equipped theories. We derive probability distributions that are unreachable by QM.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-04-15T11:36:38Z)
• A Short Report on the Probability-Based Interpretation of Quantum Mechanics [0.0]
  Popper notices how fundamental issues raised in quantum mechanics (QM) directly derive from unresolved probabilistic questions. This paper offers a brief overview of the structural theory of probability, recently published in a book, and applies it to QM in order to show its completeness. The whole probability-based interpretation of QM goes beyond the limits of a paper and these pages condense a few aspects of this theoretical scheme.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-11-05T16:08:33Z)
• Measurement incompatibility is strictly stronger than disturbance [44.99833362998488]
  Heisenberg argued that measurements irreversibly alter the state of the system on which they are acting, causing an irreducible disturbance on subsequent measurements. This article shows that measurement incompatibility is indeed a sufficient condition for irreversibility of measurement disturbance. However, we exhibit a toy theory, termed the minimal classical theory (MCT), that is a counterexample for the converse implication.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-05-26T13:47:00Z)
• The Relational Dissolution of the Quantum Measurement Problems [0.0]
  The Quantum Measurement Problem is arguably one of the most debated issues in the philosophy of Quantum Mechanics. It represents not only a technical difficulty for the standard formulation of the theory, but also a source of interpretational disputes concerning the meaning of the quantum postulates.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-11-15T19:33:59Z)
• Relative Facts of Relational Quantum Mechanics are Incompatible with Quantum Mechanics [0.0]
  RQM measurement arise from interactions which entangle a system $$S and an observer $A$ without decoherence. The criterion states that whenever an interpretation introduces a notion of outcomes, these outcomes must follow the probability distribution specified by the Born rule.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-08-24T23:15:00Z)
• Light-shift induced behaviors observed in momentum-space quantum walks [47.187609203210705]
  We present a theoretical model which proves that the coherent dynamics of the spinor condensate is sufficient to explain the experimental data. Our numerical findings are supported by an analytical prediction for the momentum distributions in the limit of zero-temperature condensates.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-05-16T14:50:05Z)
• Introducing the Q-based interpretation of quantum theory [0.0]
  I motivate the Q-based interpretation, investigate whether it is empirically adequate, and outline some of its key conceptual features. I argue that the Q-based interpretation is attractive in that it promises having no measurement problem, is conceptually parsimonious and has the potential to apply elegantly to relativistic and field-theoretic contexts.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-06-25T08:46:24Z)
• Quantum Relativity of Subsystems [58.720142291102135]
  We show that different reference frame perspectives induce different sets of subsystem observable algebras, which leads to a gauge-invariant, frame-dependent notion of subsystems and entanglement. Such a QRF perspective does not inherit the distinction between subsystems in terms of the corresponding tensor factorizability of the kinematical Hilbert space and observable algebra. Since the condition for this to occur is contingent on the choice of QRF, the notion of subsystem locality is frame-dependent.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-03-01T19:00:01Z)
• Observers of quantum systems cannot agree to disagree [55.41644538483948]
  We ask whether agreement between observers can serve as a physical principle that must hold for any theory of the world. We construct examples of (postquantum) no-signaling boxes where observers can agree to disagree.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-02-17T19:00:04Z)
• Quantum Mechanical description of Bell's experiment assumes Locality [91.3755431537592]
  Bell's experiment description assumes the (Quantum Mechanics-language equivalent of the classical) condition of Locality. This result is complementary to a recently published one demonstrating that non-Locality is necessary to describe said experiment. It is concluded that, within the framework of Quantum Mechanics, there is absolutely no reason to believe in the existence of non-Local effects.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-02-27T15:04:08Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.