Improving Efficiency and Accuracy of Causal Discovery Using a Hierarchical Wrapper

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2107.05001v1
• Date: Sun, 11 Jul 2021 09:24:49 GMT
• Title: Improving Efficiency and Accuracy of Causal Discovery Using a Hierarchical Wrapper
• Authors: Shami Nisimov, Yaniv Gurwicz, Raanan Y. Rohekar, Gal Novik
• Abstract summary: Causal discovery from observational data is an important tool in many branches of science. In the large sample limit, sound and complete causal discovery algorithms have been previously introduced. However, only finite training data is available, which limits the power of statistical tests used by these algorithms.
• Score: 7.570246812206772
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: Causal discovery from observational data is an important tool in many branches of science. Under certain assumptions it allows scientists to explain phenomena, predict, and make decisions. In the large sample limit, sound and complete causal discovery algorithms have been previously introduced, where a directed acyclic graph (DAG), or its equivalence class, representing causal relations is searched. However, in real-world cases, only finite training data is available, which limits the power of statistical tests used by these algorithms, leading to errors in the inferred causal model. This is commonly addressed by devising a strategy for using as few as possible statistical tests. In this paper, we introduce such a strategy in the form of a recursive wrapper for existing constraint-based causal discovery algorithms, which preserves soundness and completeness. It recursively clusters the observed variables using the normalized min-cut criterion from the outset, and uses a baseline causal discovery algorithm during backtracking for learning local sub-graphs. It then combines them and ensures completeness. By an ablation study, using synthetic data, and by common real-world benchmarks, we demonstrate that our approach requires significantly fewer statistical tests, learns more accurate graphs, and requires shorter run-times than the baseline algorithm.

Related papers

• Sample Efficient Bayesian Learning of Causal Graphs from Interventions [6.823521786512908]
  This study considers a Bayesian approach for learning causal graphs with limited interventional samples. We show theoretically that our proposed algorithm will return the true causal graph with high probability. We present a case study showing how this algorithm could be modified to answer more general causal questions without learning the whole graph.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-26T05:47:56Z)
• Improving Finite Sample Performance of Causal Discovery by Exploiting Temporal Structure [0.0]
  Methods of causal discovery aim to identify causal structures in a data driven way. Existing algorithms are known to be unstable and sensitive to statistical errors. We present an algorithm that exploits temporal structure, so-called tiered background knowledge.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-27T19:36:26Z)
• Adaptive Online Experimental Design for Causal Discovery [9.447864414136905]
  Causal discovery aims to uncover cause-and-effect relationships encoded in causal graphs. We focus on data interventional efficiency and formalize causal discovery from the perspective of online learning. We propose a track-and-stop causal discovery algorithm that adaptively selects interventions from the graph separating system.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-05-19T13:26:33Z)
• Sample, estimate, aggregate: A recipe for causal discovery foundation models [28.116832159265964]
  We train a supervised model that learns to predict a larger causal graph from the outputs of classical causal discovery algorithms run over subsets of variables. Our approach is enabled by the observation that typical errors in the outputs of classical methods remain comparable across datasets. Experiments on real and synthetic data demonstrate that this model maintains high accuracy in the face of misspecification or distribution shift.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-02T21:57:58Z)
• Predictive Coding beyond Correlations [59.47245250412873]
  We show how one of such algorithms, called predictive coding, is able to perform causal inference tasks. First, we show how a simple change in the inference process of predictive coding enables to compute interventions without the need to mutilate or redefine a causal graph.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-06-27T13:57:16Z)
• New metrics and search algorithms for weighted causal DAGs [7.424262881242935]
  We study causal graph discovery via adaptive interventions with node-dependent costs. We define a new benchmark that captures the worst-case interventional cost for any search algorithm. We provide adaptive search algorithms that achieve logarithmic approximations under various settings.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-05-08T03:48:37Z)
• Learning to Bound Counterfactual Inference in Structural Causal Models from Observational and Randomised Data [64.96984404868411]
  We derive a likelihood characterisation for the overall data that leads us to extend a previous EM-based algorithm. The new algorithm learns to approximate the (unidentifiability) region of model parameters from such mixed data sources. It delivers interval approximations to counterfactual results, which collapse to points in the identifiable case.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-12-06T12:42:11Z)
• Benchmarking Node Outlier Detection on Graphs [90.29966986023403]
  Graph outlier detection is an emerging but crucial machine learning task with numerous applications. We present the first comprehensive unsupervised node outlier detection benchmark for graphs called UNOD.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-06-21T01:46:38Z)
• Amortized Inference for Causal Structure Learning [72.84105256353801]
  Learning causal structure poses a search problem that typically involves evaluating structures using a score or independence test. We train a variational inference model to predict the causal structure from observational/interventional data. Our models exhibit robust generalization capabilities under substantial distribution shift.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-05-25T17:37:08Z)
• CASTLE: Regularization via Auxiliary Causal Graph Discovery [89.74800176981842]
  We introduce Causal Structure Learning (CASTLE) regularization and propose to regularize a neural network by jointly learning the causal relationships between variables. CASTLE efficiently reconstructs only the features in the causal DAG that have a causal neighbor, whereas reconstruction-based regularizers suboptimally reconstruct all input features.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-09-28T09:49:38Z)
• Good Classifiers are Abundant in the Interpolating Regime [64.72044662855612]
  We develop a methodology to compute precisely the full distribution of test errors among interpolating classifiers. We find that test errors tend to concentrate around a small typical value $varepsilon*$, which deviates substantially from the test error of worst-case interpolating model. Our results show that the usual style of analysis in statistical learning theory may not be fine-grained enough to capture the good generalization performance observed in practice.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-06-22T21:12:31Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.