From Reddit to Wall Street: The role of committed minorities in financial collective action

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2107.07361v2
• Date: Mon, 13 Sep 2021 18:06:03 GMT
• Title: From Reddit to Wall Street: The role of committed minorities in financial collective action
• Authors: Lorenzo Lucchini, Luca Maria Aiello, Laura Alessandretti, Gianmarco De Francisci Morales, Michele Starnini, Andrea Baronchelli
• Abstract summary: In January 2021, retail investors coordinated on Reddit to target short selling activity by hedge funds on GameStop shares. Such an effective collective action was unprecedented in finance, and its dynamics remain unclear. We analyse Reddit and financial data and rationalise the events based on recent findings describing how a small fraction of committed individuals may trigger behavioural cascades.
• Score: 5.4015640793167154
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/
• Abstract: In January 2021, retail investors coordinated on Reddit to target short selling activity by hedge funds on GameStop shares, causing a surge in the share price and triggering significant losses for the funds involved. Such an effective collective action was unprecedented in finance, and its dynamics remain unclear. Here, we analyse Reddit and financial data and rationalise the events based on recent findings describing how a small fraction of committed individuals may trigger behavioural cascades. First, we operationalise the concept of individual commitment in financial discussions. Second, we show that the increase of commitment within Reddit predated the initial surge in price. Third, we reveal that initial committed users occupied a central position in the network of Reddit conversations. Finally, we show that the social identity of the broader Reddit community grew as the collective action unfolded. These findings shed light on financial collective action, as several observers anticipate it will grow in importance.

Related papers

• Impact of Conflicting Transactions in Blockchain: Detecting and Mitigating Potential Attacks [0.2982610402087727]
  Conflicting transactions within blockchain networks pose performance challenges and introduce security vulnerabilities. We propose a set of countermeasures for mitigating these attacks. Our findings emphasize the critical importance of actively managing conflicting transactions to reinforce blockchain security and performance.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-07-30T17:16:54Z)
• The Illusion of Anonymity: Uncovering the Impact of User Actions on Privacy in Web3 Social Ecosystems [11.501563549824466]
  We investigate the nuanced dynamics between user engagement on Web3 social platforms and the consequent privacy concerns. We scrutinize the widespread phenomenon of fabricated activities, which encompasses the establishment of bogus accounts aimed at mimicking popularity. We highlight the urgent need for more stringent privacy measures and ethical protocols to navigate the complex web of social exchanges.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-05-22T06:26:15Z)
• The rise and fall of WallStreetBets: social roles and opinion leaders across the GameStop saga [0.0]
  We study the role of opinion leaders on Reddit WallStreetBets during the GameStop short squeeze of January 2021. Key features of opinion leaders are large risky investments and constant updates on a single stock. This work sheds light on the users' roles and dynamics that led to the GameStop short squeeze.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-03-09T11:02:26Z)
• The dynamics of the Reddit collective action leading to the GameStop short squeeze [0.0]
  In early 2021, the stock prices of GameStop, AMC, Nokia, and BlackBerry experienced dramatic increases. These events showcased the potential of online social networks to catalyze financial collective action. We find that increasing Reddit discussions anticipated high trading volume before the GameStop short squeeze. Our results shed light on the dynamics behind the first large-scale financial collective action driven by social media users.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-01-26T16:55:38Z)
• Decoding the Silent Majority: Inducing Belief Augmented Social Graph with Large Language Model for Response Forecasting [74.68371461260946]
  SocialSense is a framework that induces a belief-centered graph on top of an existent social network, along with graph-based propagation to capture social dynamics. Our method surpasses existing state-of-the-art in experimental evaluations for both zero-shot and supervised settings.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-20T06:17:02Z)
• Identifying key players in dark web marketplaces [58.720142291102135]
  This paper aims to identify the key players in Bitcoin transaction networks linked to dark markets. We show that a large fraction of the traded volume is concentrated in a small group of elite market participants. Our findings suggest that understanding the behavior of key players in dark web marketplaces is critical to effectively disrupting illegal activities.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-06-15T20:30:43Z)
• Evaluating Impact of Social Media Posts by Executives on Stock Prices [0.5429166905724048]
  Social media like Twitter, Reddit have become hotspots of such influences. This paper investigates the impact of social media posts on close price prediction of stocks using Twitter and Reddit posts.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-11-01T03:45:17Z)
• This Must Be the Place: Predicting Engagement of Online Communities in a Large-scale Distributed Campaign [70.69387048368849]
  We study the behavior of communities with millions of active members. We develop a hybrid model, combining textual cues, community meta-data, and structural properties. We demonstrate the applicability of our model through Reddit's r/place a large-scale online experiment.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-01-14T08:23:16Z)
• How COVID-19 Have Changed Crowdfunding: Evidence From GoFundMe [77.34726150561087]
  This study uses a unique data set of all the campaigns published over the past two years on GoFundMe. We study a corpus of crowdfunded projects, analyzing cover images and other variables commonly present on crowdfunding sites.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-06-18T08:03:58Z)
• The Doge of Wall Street: Analysis and Detection of Pump and Dump Cryptocurrency Manipulations [50.521292491613224]
  This paper performs an in-depth analysis of two market manipulations organized by communities over the Internet: The pump and dump and the crowd pump. The pump and dump scheme is a fraud as old as the stock market. Now, it got new vitality in the loosely regulated market of cryptocurrencies. We report on three case studies related to pump and dump groups.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-05-03T10:20:47Z)
• Supporting Financial Inclusion with Graph Machine Learning and Super-App Alternative Data [63.942632088208505]
  Super-Apps have changed the way we think about the interactions between users and commerce. This paper investigates how different interactions between users within a Super-App provide a new source of information to predict borrower behavior.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-02-19T15:13:06Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.