Impact of Conflicting Transactions in Blockchain: Detecting and Mitigating Potential Attacks

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2407.20980v1
• Date: Tue, 30 Jul 2024 17:16:54 GMT
• Title: Impact of Conflicting Transactions in Blockchain: Detecting and Mitigating Potential Attacks
• Authors: Faisal Haque Bappy, Kamrul Hasan, Joon S. Park, Carlos Caicedo, Tariqul Islam,
• Abstract summary: Conflicting transactions within blockchain networks pose performance challenges and introduce security vulnerabilities. We propose a set of countermeasures for mitigating these attacks. Our findings emphasize the critical importance of actively managing conflicting transactions to reinforce blockchain security and performance.
• Score: 0.2982610402087727
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: Conflicting transactions within blockchain networks not only pose performance challenges but also introduce security vulnerabilities, potentially facilitating malicious attacks. In this paper, we explore the impact of conflicting transactions on blockchain attack vectors. Through modeling and simulation, we delve into the dynamics of four pivotal attacks - block withholding, double spending, balance, and distributed denial of service (DDoS), all orchestrated using conflicting transactions. Our analysis not only focuses on the mechanisms through which these attacks exploit transaction conflicts but also underscores their potential impact on the integrity and reliability of blockchain networks. Additionally, we propose a set of countermeasures for mitigating these attacks. Through implementation and evaluation, we show their effectiveness in lowering attack rates and enhancing overall network performance seamlessly, without introducing additional overhead. Our findings emphasize the critical importance of actively managing conflicting transactions to reinforce blockchain security and performance.

Related papers

• Examining Attacks on Consensus and Incentive Systems in Proof-of-Work Blockchains: A Systematic Literature Review [0.0]
  Bitcoin's security relies on a decentralized ledger consisting of a consensus and an incentive mechanism. As Bitcoin's acceptance grows, it faces increasing threats from attacks targeting these mechanisms. This paper begins by examining individual attacks executed in isolation and their profitability. It then explores how combining these attacks with each other or with other malicious and non-malicious strategies can enhance their overall effectiveness and profitability.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-11-01T04:18:42Z)
• Blockchain Economic Denial of Sustainability Attack: Exploiting Latency Optimization in Ethereum Transaction Forwarding [13.13413794919346]
  Economic Denial of Sustainability (EDoS) attack can cause financial losses in traffic costs for operators of modified nodes. We show that an attacker can amplify network traffic at modified nodes by a factor of 3,600, and cause economic damages 13,800 times greater than the amount needed to carry out the attack.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-08-02T18:06:33Z)
• Maximizing Blockchain Performance: Mitigating Conflicting Transactions through Parallelism and Dependency Management [0.18641315013048293]
  "Conflicting transactions" contribute to high network latency and transaction failures. We present a novel scheme that integrates transaction parallelism and an intelligent dependency manager. Results show that our scheme outperforms both existing parallel and non-parallel Hyperledger Fabric blockchain networks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-07-01T16:17:33Z)
• Multi-granular Adversarial Attacks against Black-box Neural Ranking Models [111.58315434849047]
  We create high-quality adversarial examples by incorporating multi-granular perturbations. We transform the multi-granular attack into a sequential decision-making process. Our attack method surpasses prevailing baselines in both attack effectiveness and imperceptibility.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-04-02T02:08:29Z)
• Graph Attention Network-based Block Propagation with Optimal AoI and Reputation in Web 3.0 [59.94605620983965]
  We design a Graph Attention Network (GAT)-based reliable block propagation optimization framework for blockchain-enabled Web 3.0. To achieve the reliability of block propagation, we introduce a reputation mechanism based on the subjective logic model. Considering that the GAT possesses the excellent ability to process graph-structured data, we utilize the GAT with reinforcement learning to obtain the optimal block propagation trajectory.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-03-20T01:58:38Z)
• Generative AI-enabled Blockchain Networks: Fundamentals, Applications, and Case Study [73.87110604150315]
  Generative Artificial Intelligence (GAI) has emerged as a promising solution to address challenges of blockchain technology. In this paper, we first introduce GAI techniques, outline their applications, and discuss existing solutions for integrating GAI into blockchains.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-01-28T10:46:17Z)
• LookAhead: Preventing DeFi Attacks via Unveiling Adversarial Contracts [15.071155232677643]
  Decentralized Finance (DeFi) incidents have resulted in financial damages exceeding 3 billion US dollars. Current detection tools face significant challenges in identifying attack activities effectively. We propose a new direction for detecting DeFi attacks that focuses on identifying adversarial contracts.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-01-14T11:39:33Z)
• Collaborative Learning Framework to Detect Attacks in Transactions and Smart Contracts [26.70294159598272]
  This paper presents a novel collaborative learning framework designed to detect attacks in blockchain transactions and smart contracts. Our framework exhibits the capability to classify various types of blockchain attacks, including intricate attacks at the machine code level. Our framework achieves a detection accuracy of approximately 94% through extensive simulations and 91% in real-time experiments with a throughput of over 2,150 transactions per second.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-08-30T07:17:20Z)
• Designing an attack-defense game: how to increase robustness of financial transaction models via a competition [69.08339915577206]
  Given the escalating risks of malicious attacks in the finance sector, understanding adversarial strategies and robust defense mechanisms for machine learning models is critical. We aim to investigate the current state and dynamics of adversarial attacks and defenses for neural network models that use sequential financial data as the input. We have designed a competition that allows realistic and detailed investigation of problems in modern financial transaction data. The participants compete directly against each other, so possible attacks and defenses are examined in close-to-real-life conditions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-08-22T12:53:09Z)
• Combating Adversaries with Anti-Adversaries [118.70141983415445]
  In particular, our layer generates an input perturbation in the opposite direction of the adversarial one. We verify the effectiveness of our approach by combining our layer with both nominally and robustly trained models. Our anti-adversary layer significantly enhances model robustness while coming at no cost on clean accuracy.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-03-26T09:36:59Z)
• A Self-supervised Approach for Adversarial Robustness [105.88250594033053]
  Adversarial examples can cause catastrophic mistakes in Deep Neural Network (DNNs) based vision systems. This paper proposes a self-supervised adversarial training mechanism in the input space. It provides significant robustness against the textbfunseen adversarial attacks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-06-08T20:42:39Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.