A novel meta-learning initialization method for physics-informed neural networks

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2107.10991v1
• Date: Fri, 23 Jul 2021 01:55:23 GMT
• Title: A novel meta-learning initialization method for physics-informed neural networks
• Authors: Xu Liu, Xiaoya Zhang, Wei Peng, Weien Zhou, Wen Yao
• Abstract summary: Physics-informed neural networks (PINNs) have been widely used to solve various scientific computing problems. We propose a New Reptile initialization based Physics-Informed Neural Network (NRPINN) Experimental results show that the NRPINN training is much faster and achieves higher accuracy than PINNs with other training methods.
• Score: 6.864312468709774
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: Physics-informed neural networks (PINNs) have been widely used to solve various scientific computing problems. However, large training costs limit PINNs for some real-time applications. Although some works have been proposed to improve the training efficiency of PINNs, few consider the influence of initialization. To this end, we propose a New Reptile initialization based Physics-Informed Neural Network (NRPINN). The original Reptile algorithm is a meta-learning initialization method based on labeled data. PINNs can be trained with less labeled data or even without any labeled data by adding partial differential equations (PDEs) as a penalty term into the loss function. Inspired by this idea, we propose the new Reptile initialization to sample more tasks from the parameterized PDEs and adapt the penalty term of the loss. The new Reptile initialization can acquire initialization parameters from related tasks by supervised, unsupervised, and semi-supervised learning. Then, PINNs with initialization parameters can efficiently solve PDEs. Besides, the new Reptile initialization can also be used for the variants of PINNs. Finally, we demonstrate and verify the NRPINN considering both forward problems, including solving Poisson, Burgers, and Schr\"odinger equations, as well as inverse problems, where unknown parameters in the PDEs are estimated. Experimental results show that the NRPINN training is much faster and achieves higher accuracy than PINNs with other initialization methods.

Related papers

• Equation identification for fluid flows via physics-informed neural networks [46.29203572184694]
  We present a new benchmark problem for inverse PINNs based on a parametric sweep of the 2D Burgers' equation with rotational flow. We show that a novel strategy that alternates between first- and second-order optimization proves superior to typical first-order strategies for estimating parameters.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-08-30T13:17:57Z)
• Improving PINNs By Algebraic Inclusion of Boundary and Initial Conditions [0.1874930567916036]
  "AI for Science" aims to solve fundamental scientific problems using AI techniques. In this work we explore the possibility of changing the model being trained from being just a neural network to being a non-linear transformation of it. This reduces the number of terms in the loss function than the standard PINN losses.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-07-30T11:19:48Z)
• iPINNs: Incremental learning for Physics-informed neural networks [66.4795381419701]
  Physics-informed neural networks (PINNs) have recently become a powerful tool for solving partial differential equations (PDEs) We propose incremental PINNs that can learn multiple tasks sequentially without additional parameters for new tasks and improve performance for every equation in the sequence. Our approach learns multiple PDEs starting from the simplest one by creating its own subnetwork for each PDE and allowing each subnetwork to overlap with previously learnedworks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-04-10T20:19:20Z)
• FO-PINNs: A First-Order formulation for Physics Informed Neural Networks [1.8874301050354767]
  Physics-Informed Neural Networks (PINNs) are a class of deep learning neural networks that learn the response of a physical system without any simulation data. PINNs are successfully used for solving forward and inverse problems, but their accuracy decreases significantly for parameterized systems. We present first-order physics-informed neural networks (FO-PINNs) that are trained using a first-order formulation of the PDE loss function.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-10-25T20:25:33Z)
• Auto-PINN: Understanding and Optimizing Physics-Informed Neural Architecture [77.59766598165551]
  Physics-informed neural networks (PINNs) are revolutionizing science and engineering practice by bringing together the power of deep learning to bear on scientific computation. Here, we propose Auto-PINN, which employs Neural Architecture Search (NAS) techniques to PINN design. A comprehensive set of pre-experiments using standard PDE benchmarks allows us to probe the structure-performance relationship in PINNs.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-05-27T03:24:31Z)
• Revisiting PINNs: Generative Adversarial Physics-informed Neural Networks and Point-weighting Method [70.19159220248805]
  Physics-informed neural networks (PINNs) provide a deep learning framework for numerically solving partial differential equations (PDEs) We propose the generative adversarial neural network (GA-PINN), which integrates the generative adversarial (GA) mechanism with the structure of PINNs. Inspired from the weighting strategy of the Adaboost method, we then introduce a point-weighting (PW) method to improve the training efficiency of PINNs.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-05-18T06:50:44Z)
• Certified machine learning: A posteriori error estimation for physics-informed neural networks [0.0]
  PINNs are known to be robust for smaller training sets, derive better generalization problems, and are faster to train. We show that using PINNs in comparison with purely data-driven neural networks is not only favorable for training performance but allows us to extract significant information on the quality of the approximated solution.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-03-31T14:23:04Z)
• Learning Physics-Informed Neural Networks without Stacked Back-propagation [82.26566759276105]
  We develop a novel approach that can significantly accelerate the training of Physics-Informed Neural Networks. In particular, we parameterize the PDE solution by the Gaussian smoothed model and show that, derived from Stein's Identity, the second-order derivatives can be efficiently calculated without back-propagation. Experimental results show that our proposed method can achieve competitive error compared to standard PINN training but is two orders of magnitude faster.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-02-18T18:07:54Z)
• Gradient-enhanced physics-informed neural networks for forward and inverse PDE problems [2.0062792633909026]
  Deep learning has been shown to be an effective tool in solving partial differential equations (PDEs) through physics-informed neural networks (PINNs) PINNs embed the PDE residual into the loss function of the neural network, and have been successfully employed to solve diverse forward and inverse PDE problems. Here, we propose a new method, gradient-enhanced physics-informed neural networks (gPINNs) for improving the accuracy and training efficiency of PINNs.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-11-01T18:01:38Z)
• Training Feedback Spiking Neural Networks by Implicit Differentiation on the Equilibrium State [66.2457134675891]
  Spiking neural networks (SNNs) are brain-inspired models that enable energy-efficient implementation on neuromorphic hardware. Most existing methods imitate the backpropagation framework and feedforward architectures for artificial neural networks. We propose a novel training method that does not rely on the exact reverse of the forward computation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-09-29T07:46:54Z)
• Characterizing possible failure modes in physics-informed neural networks [55.83255669840384]
  Recent work in scientific machine learning has developed so-called physics-informed neural network (PINN) models. We demonstrate that, while existing PINN methodologies can learn good models for relatively trivial problems, they can easily fail to learn relevant physical phenomena even for simple PDEs. We show that these possible failure modes are not due to the lack of expressivity in the NN architecture, but that the PINN's setup makes the loss landscape very hard to optimize.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-09-02T16:06:45Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.