A comparison of combined data assimilation and machine learning methods for offline and online model error correction

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2107.11114v1
• Date: Fri, 23 Jul 2021 09:57:45 GMT
• Title: A comparison of combined data assimilation and machine learning methods for offline and online model error correction
• Authors: Alban Farchi, Marc Bocquet, Patrick Laloyaux, Massimo Bonavita, Quentin Malartic
• Abstract summary: We show that it is possible to combine machine learning methods with data assimilation to reconstruct a dynamical system. The same approach can be used to correct the error of a knowledge-based model. We show that the tendency correction opens the possibility to make online model error correction.
• Score: 0.0
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: Recent studies have shown that it is possible to combine machine learning methods with data assimilation to reconstruct a dynamical system using only sparse and noisy observations of that system. The same approach can be used to correct the error of a knowledge-based model. The resulting surrogate model is hybrid, with a statistical part supplementing a physical part. In practice, the correction can be added as an integrated term (i.e. in the model resolvent) or directly inside the tendencies of the physical model. The resolvent correction is easy to implement. The tendency correction is more technical, in particular it requires the adjoint of the physical model, but also more flexible. We use the two-scale Lorenz model to compare the two methods. The accuracy in long-range forecast experiments is somewhat similar between the surrogate models using the resolvent correction and the tendency correction. By contrast, the surrogate models using the tendency correction significantly outperform the surrogate models using the resolvent correction in data assimilation experiments. Finally, we show that the tendency correction opens the possibility to make online model error correction, i.e. improving the model progressively as new observations become available. The resulting algorithm can be seen as a new formulation of weak-constraint 4D-Var. We compare online and offline learning using the same framework with the two-scale Lorenz system, and show that with online learning, it is possible to extract all the information from sparse and noisy observations.

Related papers

• Towards Aligned Data Removal via Twin Machine Unlearning [30.070660418732807]
  Modern privacy regulations have spurred the evolution of machine unlearning. We present a Twin Machine Unlearning (TMU) approach, where a twin unlearning problem is defined corresponding to the original unlearning problem. Our approach significantly enhances the alignment between the unlearned model and the gold model.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-08-21T08:42:21Z)
• LARA: A Light and Anti-overfitting Retraining Approach for Unsupervised Time Series Anomaly Detection [49.52429991848581]
  We propose a Light and Anti-overfitting Retraining Approach (LARA) for deep variational auto-encoder based time series anomaly detection methods (VAEs) This work aims to make three novel contributions: 1) the retraining process is formulated as a convex problem and can converge at a fast rate as well as prevent overfitting; 2) designing a ruminate block, which leverages the historical data without the need to store them; and 3) mathematically proving that when fine-tuning the latent vector and reconstructed data, the linear formations can achieve the least adjusting errors between the ground truths and the fine-tuned ones.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-09T12:36:16Z)
• Analysis of Interpolating Regression Models and the Double Descent Phenomenon [3.883460584034765]
  It is commonly assumed that models which interpolate noisy training data are poor to generalize. The best models obtained are overparametrized and the testing error exhibits the double descent behavior as the model order increases. We derive a result based on the behavior of the smallest singular value of the regression matrix that explains the peak location and the double descent shape of the testing error as a function of model order.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-04-17T09:44:33Z)
• Online model error correction with neural networks in the incremental 4D-Var framework [0.0]
  We develop a new weak-constraint 4D-Var formulation which can be used to train a neural network for online model error correction. The method is implemented in the ECMWF Object-Oriented Prediction System. The results confirm that online learning is effective and yields a more accurate model error correction than offline learning.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-10-25T07:45:33Z)
• Self-Damaging Contrastive Learning [92.34124578823977]
  Unlabeled data in reality is commonly imbalanced and shows a long-tail distribution. This paper proposes a principled framework called Self-Damaging Contrastive Learning to automatically balance the representation learning without knowing the classes. Our experiments show that SDCLR significantly improves not only overall accuracies but also balancedness.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-06-06T00:04:49Z)
• Churn Reduction via Distillation [54.5952282395487]
  We show an equivalence between training with distillation using the base model as the teacher and training with an explicit constraint on the predictive churn. We then show that distillation performs strongly for low churn training against a number of recent baselines.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-06-04T18:03:31Z)
• Distilling Interpretable Models into Human-Readable Code [71.11328360614479]
  Human-readability is an important and desirable standard for machine-learned model interpretability. We propose to train interpretable models using conventional methods, and then distill them into concise, human-readable code. We describe a piecewise-linear curve-fitting algorithm that produces high-quality results efficiently and reliably across a broad range of use cases.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-01-21T01:46:36Z)
• Positive-Congruent Training: Towards Regression-Free Model Updates [87.25247195148187]
  In image classification, sample-wise inconsistencies appear as "negative flips" A new model incorrectly predicts the output for a test sample that was correctly classified by the old (reference) model. We propose a simple approach for PC training, Focal Distillation, which enforces congruence with the reference model.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-11-18T09:00:44Z)
• Using machine learning to correct model error in data assimilation and forecast applications [0.0]
  We propose to use this method to correct the error of an existent, knowledge-based model. The resulting surrogate model is an hybrid model between the original (knowledge-based) model and the ML model. Using the hybrid surrogate models for DA yields a significantly better analysis than using the original model.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-10-23T18:30:45Z)
• Factual Error Correction for Abstractive Summarization Models [41.77317902748772]
  We propose a post-editing corrector module to correct factual errors in generated summaries. We show that our model is able to correct factual errors in summaries generated by other neural summarization models. We also find that transferring from artificial error correction to downstream settings is still very challenging.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-10-17T04:24:16Z)
• Good Classifiers are Abundant in the Interpolating Regime [64.72044662855612]
  We develop a methodology to compute precisely the full distribution of test errors among interpolating classifiers. We find that test errors tend to concentrate around a small typical value $varepsilon*$, which deviates substantially from the test error of worst-case interpolating model. Our results show that the usual style of analysis in statistical learning theory may not be fine-grained enough to capture the good generalization performance observed in practice.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-06-22T21:12:31Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.