Toward AI Assistants That Let Designers Design
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2107.13074v1
- Date: Thu, 22 Jul 2021 10:29:36 GMT
- Title: Toward AI Assistants That Let Designers Design
- Authors: Sebastiaan De Peuter (1), Antti Oulasvirta (2), Samuel Kaski (1 and 3)
((1) Department of Computer Science, Aalto University, Finland, (2)
Department of Communications and Networking, Aalto University, Finland, (3)
Department of Computer Science, University of Manchester, UK)
- Abstract summary: AI for supporting designers needs to be rethought. It should aim to cooperate, not automate, by supporting and leveraging the creativity and problem-solving of designers.
We present AI-assisted design: a framework for creating such AI, built around generative user models which enable reasoning about designers' goals, reasoning, and capabilities.
- Score: 0.0
- License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
- Abstract: AI for supporting designers needs to be rethought. It should aim to
cooperate, not automate, by supporting and leveraging the creativity and
problem-solving of designers. The challenge for such AI is how to infer
designers' goals and then help them without being needlessly disruptive. We
present AI-assisted design: a framework for creating such AI, built around
generative user models which enable reasoning about designers' goals,
reasoning, and capabilities.
Related papers
- Grasping AI: experiential exercises for designers [8.95562850825636]
We investigate techniques for exploring and reflecting on the interactional affordances, the unique relational possibilities, and the wider social implications of AI systems.
We find that exercises around metaphors and enactments make questions of training and learning, privacy and consent, autonomy and agency more tangible.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-10-02T15:34:08Z) - Exploring Challenges and Opportunities to Support Designers in Learning
to Co-create with AI-based Manufacturing Design Tools [31.685493295306387]
AI-based design tools are proliferating in professional software to assist engineering and industrial designers in complex manufacturing and design tasks.
These tools take on more agentic roles than traditional computer-aided design tools and are often portrayed as "co-creators"
To date, we know little about how engineering designers learn to work with AI-based design tools.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-03-01T02:57:05Z) - Designerly Understanding: Information Needs for Model Transparency to
Support Design Ideation for AI-Powered User Experience [42.73738624139124]
Designers face hurdles understanding AI technologies, such as pre-trained language models, as design materials.
This limits their ability to ideate and make decisions about whether, where, and how to use AI.
Our study highlights the pivotal role that UX designers can play in Responsible AI.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-02-21T02:06:24Z) - Seamful XAI: Operationalizing Seamful Design in Explainable AI [59.89011292395202]
Mistakes in AI systems are inevitable, arising from both technical limitations and sociotechnical gaps.
We propose that seamful design can foster AI explainability by revealing sociotechnical and infrastructural mismatches.
We explore this process with 43 AI practitioners and real end-users.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-11-12T21:54:05Z) - Investigating Positive and Negative Qualities of Human-in-the-Loop
Optimization for Designing Interaction Techniques [55.492211642128446]
Designers reportedly struggle with design optimization tasks where they are asked to find a combination of design parameters that maximizes a given set of objectives.
Model-based computational design algorithms assist designers by generating design examples during design.
Black box methods for assistance, on the other hand, can work with any design problem.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-04-15T20:40:43Z) - Cybertrust: From Explainable to Actionable and Interpretable AI (AI2) [58.981120701284816]
Actionable and Interpretable AI (AI2) will incorporate explicit quantifications and visualizations of user confidence in AI recommendations.
It will allow examining and testing of AI system predictions to establish a basis for trust in the systems' decision making.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-01-26T18:53:09Z) - A User-Centred Framework for Explainable Artificial Intelligence in
Human-Robot Interaction [70.11080854486953]
We propose a user-centred framework for XAI that focuses on its social-interactive aspect.
The framework aims to provide a structure for interactive XAI solutions thought for non-expert users.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-09-27T09:56:23Z) - Design-Driven Requirements for Computationally Co-Creative Game AI
Design Tools [6.719205507619887]
We present a participatory design study that categorizes and analyzes game AI designers' goals, expectations for such tools.
We evince deep connections between game AI design and the design of co-creative tools, and present implications for future co-creativity tool research and development.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-07-29T04:14:53Z) - Building Bridges: Generative Artworks to Explore AI Ethics [56.058588908294446]
In recent years, there has been an increased emphasis on understanding and mitigating adverse impacts of artificial intelligence (AI) technologies on society.
A significant challenge in the design of ethical AI systems is that there are multiple stakeholders in the AI pipeline, each with their own set of constraints and interests.
This position paper outlines some potential ways in which generative artworks can play this role by serving as accessible and powerful educational tools.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-06-25T22:31:55Z) - BlackBox Toolkit: Intelligent Assistance to UI Design [9.749560288448114]
We propose to modify the UI design process by assisting it with artificial intelligence (AI)
We propose to enable AI to perform repetitive tasks for the designer while allowing the designer to take command of the creative process.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-04-04T14:50:26Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.