Artificial Intelligence in Achieving Sustainable Development Goals
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2107.13966v1
- Date: Fri, 23 Jul 2021 03:51:10 GMT
- Title: Artificial Intelligence in Achieving Sustainable Development Goals
- Authors: Hoe-Han Goh
- Abstract summary: This perspective illustrates some of the AI applications that can accelerate the achievement of SDGs.
It emphasizes the importance of establishing standard AI guidelines and regulations for the beneficial applications of AI.
- Score: 0.0
- License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
- Abstract: This perspective illustrates some of the AI applications that can accelerate
the achievement of SDGs and also highlights some of the considerations that
could hinder the efforts towards them. This emphasizes the importance of
establishing standard AI guidelines and regulations for the beneficial
applications of AI.
Related papers
- Using AI Alignment Theory to understand the potential pitfalls of regulatory frameworks [55.2480439325792]
This paper critically examines the European Union's Artificial Intelligence Act (EU AI Act)
Uses insights from Alignment Theory (AT) research, which focuses on the potential pitfalls of technical alignment in Artificial Intelligence.
As we apply these concepts to the EU AI Act, we uncover potential vulnerabilities and areas for improvement in the regulation.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-10-10T17:38:38Z) - POLARIS: A framework to guide the development of Trustworthy AI systems [3.02243271391691]
There is a significant gap between high-level AI ethics principles and low-level concrete practices for AI professionals.
We develop a novel holistic framework for Trustworthy AI - designed to bridge the gap between theory and practice.
Our goal is to empower AI professionals to confidently navigate the ethical dimensions of Trustworthy AI.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-02-08T01:05:16Z) - The Role of AI in Drug Discovery: Challenges, Opportunities, and
Strategies [97.5153823429076]
The benefits, challenges and drawbacks of AI in this field are reviewed.
The use of data augmentation, explainable AI, and the integration of AI with traditional experimental methods are also discussed.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-12-08T23:23:39Z) - Good AI for Good: How AI Strategies of the Nordic Countries Address the
Sustainable Development Goals [8.862707047517913]
We present an analysis of existing AI recommendations from 10 different countries or organisations.
The analysis shows no significant difference on how much these strategy documents refer to the SDGs.
references to textitgender equality and textitinequality are notably missing from the guidelines.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-10-08T08:17:30Z) - Let it RAIN for Social Good [7.315761817405695]
Responsible Norms (RAIN) framework is presented to bridge the abstraction gap between high-level values and responsible action.
With effective and operationalized AI Ethics, AI technologies can be directed towards global sustainable development.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-07-26T13:37:13Z) - Sustainable Artificial Intelligence through Continual Learning [4.243356707599486]
We identify Continual Learning as a promising approach towards the design of systems compliant with the Sustainable AI principles.
While Sustainable AI outlines general desiderata for ethical applications, Continual Learning provides means to put such desiderata into practice.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-11-17T22:43:13Z) - Building Bridges: Generative Artworks to Explore AI Ethics [56.058588908294446]
In recent years, there has been an increased emphasis on understanding and mitigating adverse impacts of artificial intelligence (AI) technologies on society.
A significant challenge in the design of ethical AI systems is that there are multiple stakeholders in the AI pipeline, each with their own set of constraints and interests.
This position paper outlines some potential ways in which generative artworks can play this role by serving as accessible and powerful educational tools.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-06-25T22:31:55Z) - An interdisciplinary conceptual study of Artificial Intelligence (AI)
for helping benefit-risk assessment practices: Towards a comprehensive
qualification matrix of AI programs and devices (pre-print 2020) [55.41644538483948]
This paper proposes a comprehensive analysis of existing concepts coming from different disciplines tackling the notion of intelligence.
The aim is to identify shared notions or discrepancies to consider for qualifying AI systems.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-05-07T12:01:31Z) - Actionable Principles for Artificial Intelligence Policy: Three Pathways [0.0]
This paper proposes a novel framework for the development of Actionable Principles for AI.
The approach acknowledges the relevance of AI Ethics Principles and homes in on methodological elements to increase their practical implementability in policy processes.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-02-24T16:57:35Z) - Toward Trustworthy AI Development: Mechanisms for Supporting Verifiable
Claims [59.64274607533249]
AI developers need to make verifiable claims to which they can be held accountable.
This report suggests various steps that different stakeholders can take to improve the verifiability of claims made about AI systems.
We analyze ten mechanisms for this purpose--spanning institutions, software, and hardware--and make recommendations aimed at implementing, exploring, or improving those mechanisms.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-04-15T17:15:35Z) - On the Morality of Artificial Intelligence [154.69452301122175]
We propose conceptual and practical principles and guidelines for Machine Learning research and deployment.
We insist on concrete actions that can be taken by practitioners to pursue a more ethical and moral practice of ML aimed at using AI for social good.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2019-12-26T23:06:54Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.