Let it RAIN for Social Good

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2208.04697v1
• Date: Tue, 26 Jul 2022 13:37:13 GMT
• Title: Let it RAIN for Social Good
• Authors: Mattias Br\"annstr\"om, Andreas Theodorou, Virginia Dignum
• Abstract summary: Responsible Norms (RAIN) framework is presented to bridge the abstraction gap between high-level values and responsible action. With effective and operationalized AI Ethics, AI technologies can be directed towards global sustainable development.
• Score: 7.315761817405695
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: Artificial Intelligence (AI) as a highly transformative technology take on a special role as both an enabler and a threat to UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs). AI Ethics and emerging high-level policy efforts stand at the pivot point between these outcomes but is barred from effect due the abstraction gap between high-level values and responsible action. In this paper the Responsible Norms (RAIN) framework is presented, bridging this gap thereby enabling effective high-level control of AI impact. With effective and operationalized AI Ethics, AI technologies can be directed towards global sustainable development.

Related papers

• AI in Action: Accelerating Progress Towards the Sustainable Development Goals [4.09375125119842]
  We draw on Google's internal and collaborative research, technical work, and social impact initiatives to show AI's potential to accelerate action on the UN's Sustainable Development Goals. The paper highlights AI capabilities (including computer vision, generative AI, natural language processing, and multimodal AI) and showcases how AI is altering how we approach problem-solving across all 17 SDGs. We then offer insights on AI development and deployment to drive bold and responsible innovation, enhance impact, close the accessibility gap, and ensure that everyone, everywhere, can benefit from AI.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-07-02T23:25:27Z)
• A Manifesto for a Pro-Actively Responsible AI in Education [0.0]
  The paper offers a five-point manifesto aimed to revitalise AIED' contributions to education and broader AI community. It suggests enhanced interdisciplinary collaboration, a broadened understanding of AI's impact on human functioning, and commitment to setting agendas for human-centred educational innovations.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-05-03T14:23:41Z)
• Quantifying AI Vulnerabilities: A Synthesis of Complexity, Dynamical Systems, and Game Theory [0.0]
  We propose a novel approach that introduces three metrics: System Complexity Index (SCI), Lyapunov Exponent for AI Stability (LEAIS), and Nash Equilibrium Robustness (NER) SCI quantifies the inherent complexity of an AI system, LEAIS captures its stability and sensitivity to perturbations, and NER evaluates its strategic robustness against adversarial manipulation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-04-07T07:05:59Z)
• Towards Responsible AI in Banking: Addressing Bias for Fair Decision-Making [69.44075077934914]
  "Responsible AI" emphasizes the critical nature of addressing biases within the development of a corporate culture. This thesis is structured around three fundamental pillars: understanding bias, mitigating bias, and accounting for bias. In line with open-source principles, we have released Bias On Demand and FairView as accessible Python packages.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-01-13T14:07:09Z)
• Responsible AI Research Needs Impact Statements Too [51.37368267352821]
  Work in responsible artificial intelligence (RAI), ethical AI, or ethics in AI is no exception. Work in responsible artificial intelligence (RAI), ethical AI, or ethics in AI is no exception.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-11-20T14:02:28Z)
• Managing extreme AI risks amid rapid progress [171.05448842016125]
  We describe risks that include large-scale social harms, malicious uses, and irreversible loss of human control over autonomous AI systems. There is a lack of consensus about how exactly such risks arise, and how to manage them. Present governance initiatives lack the mechanisms and institutions to prevent misuse and recklessness, and barely address autonomous systems.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-26T17:59:06Z)
• An Artificial Intelligence-based Framework to Achieve the Sustainable Development Goals in the Context of Bangladesh [1.0276024900942875]
  We explore the impact of AI on three pillars of sustainable development: society, environment, and economy. We propose a framework that may reduce the negative impact of AI and promote the proactiveness of this technology.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-04-23T17:36:37Z)
• Fairness in AI and Its Long-Term Implications on Society [68.8204255655161]
  We take a closer look at AI fairness and analyze how lack of AI fairness can lead to deepening of biases over time. We discuss how biased models can lead to more negative real-world outcomes for certain groups. If the issues persist, they could be reinforced by interactions with other risks and have severe implications on society in the form of social unrest.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-04-16T11:22:59Z)
• Fairness in Agreement With European Values: An Interdisciplinary Perspective on AI Regulation [61.77881142275982]
  This interdisciplinary position paper considers various concerns surrounding fairness and discrimination in AI, and discusses how AI regulations address them. We first look at AI and fairness through the lenses of law, (AI) industry, sociotechnology, and (moral) philosophy, and present various perspectives. We identify and propose the roles AI Regulation should take to make the endeavor of the AI Act a success in terms of AI fairness concerns.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-06-08T12:32:08Z)
• Building Bridges: Generative Artworks to Explore AI Ethics [56.058588908294446]
  In recent years, there has been an increased emphasis on understanding and mitigating adverse impacts of artificial intelligence (AI) technologies on society. A significant challenge in the design of ethical AI systems is that there are multiple stakeholders in the AI pipeline, each with their own set of constraints and interests. This position paper outlines some potential ways in which generative artworks can play this role by serving as accessible and powerful educational tools.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-06-25T22:31:55Z)
• AI and Ethics -- Operationalising Responsible AI [13.781989627894813]
  Building and maintaining public trust in AI has been identified as the key to successful and sustainable innovation. This chapter discusses the challenges related to operationalizing ethical AI principles and presents an integrated view that covers high-level ethical AI principles.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-05-19T00:55:40Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.