Development and evaluation of intraoperative ultrasound segmentation with negative image frames and multiple observer labels

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2108.04114v1
• Date: Wed, 28 Jul 2021 12:15:49 GMT
• Title: Development and evaluation of intraoperative ultrasound segmentation with negative image frames and multiple observer labels
• Authors: Liam F Chalcroft, Jiongqi Qu, Sophie A Martin, Iani JMB Gayo, Giulio V Minore, Imraj RD Singh, Shaheer U Saeed, Qianye Yang, Zachary MC Baum, Andre Altmann, Yipeng Hu
• Abstract summary: We evaluate the utility of a pre-screening classification network prior to the segmentation network. We show experimentally that a previously proposed approach, combining random sampling and consensus labels, may need to be adapted to perform well in our application.
• Score: 0.17159130619349347
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: When developing deep neural networks for segmenting intraoperative ultrasound images, several practical issues are encountered frequently, such as the presence of ultrasound frames that do not contain regions of interest and the high variance in ground-truth labels. In this study, we evaluate the utility of a pre-screening classification network prior to the segmentation network. Experimental results demonstrate that such a classifier, minimising frame classification errors, was able to directly impact the number of false positive and false negative frames. Importantly, the segmentation accuracy on the classifier-selected frames, that would be segmented, remains comparable to or better than those from standalone segmentation networks. Interestingly, the efficacy of the pre-screening classifier was affected by the sampling methods for training labels from multiple observers, a seemingly independent problem. We show experimentally that a previously proposed approach, combining random sampling and consensus labels, may need to be adapted to perform well in our application. Furthermore, this work aims to share practical experience in developing a machine learning application that assists highly variable interventional imaging for prostate cancer patients, to present robust and reproducible open-source implementations, and to report a set of comprehensive results and analysis comparing these practical, yet important, options in a real-world clinical application.

Related papers

• Explanations of Classifiers Enhance Medical Image Segmentation via End-to-end Pre-training [37.11542605885003]
  Medical image segmentation aims to identify and locate abnormal structures in medical images, such as chest radiographs, using deep neural networks. Our work collects explanations from well-trained classifiers to generate pseudo labels of segmentation tasks. We then use Integrated Gradients (IG) method to distill and boost the explanations obtained from the classifiers, generating massive diagnosis-oriented localization labels (DoLL) These DoLL-annotated images are used for pre-training the model before fine-tuning it for downstream segmentation tasks, including COVID-19 infectious areas, lungs, heart, and clavicles.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-01-16T16:18:42Z)
• Multi-task Explainable Skin Lesion Classification [54.76511683427566]
  We propose a few-shot-based approach for skin lesions that generalizes well with few labelled data. The proposed approach comprises a fusion of a segmentation network that acts as an attention module and classification network.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-11T05:49:47Z)
• Cross-supervised Dual Classifiers for Semi-supervised Medical Image Segmentation [10.18427897663732]
  Semi-supervised medical image segmentation offers a promising solution for large-scale medical image analysis. This paper proposes a cross-supervised learning framework based on dual classifiers (DC-Net) Experiments on LA and Pancreas-CT dataset illustrate that DC-Net outperforms other state-of-the-art methods for semi-supervised segmentation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-05-25T16:23:39Z)
• Multi-Modal Evaluation Approach for Medical Image Segmentation [4.989480853499916]
  We propose a novel multi-modal evaluation (MME) approach to measure the effectiveness of different segmentation methods. We introduce new relevant and interpretable characteristics, including detection property, boundary alignment, uniformity, total volume, and relative volume. Our proposed approach is open-source and publicly available for use.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-02-08T15:31:33Z)
• Rethinking Semi-Supervised Medical Image Segmentation: A Variance-Reduction Perspective [51.70661197256033]
  We propose ARCO, a semi-supervised contrastive learning framework with stratified group theory for medical image segmentation. We first propose building ARCO through the concept of variance-reduced estimation and show that certain variance-reduction techniques are particularly beneficial in pixel/voxel-level segmentation tasks. We experimentally validate our approaches on eight benchmarks, i.e., five 2D/3D medical and three semantic segmentation datasets, with different label settings.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-02-03T13:50:25Z)
• Reliable Joint Segmentation of Retinal Edema Lesions in OCT Images [55.83984261827332]
  In this paper, we propose a novel reliable multi-scale wavelet-enhanced transformer network. We develop a novel segmentation backbone that integrates a wavelet-enhanced feature extractor network and a multi-scale transformer module. Our proposed method achieves better segmentation accuracy with a high degree of reliability as compared to other state-of-the-art segmentation approaches.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-12-01T07:32:56Z)
• Generative Adversarial Networks for Weakly Supervised Generation and Evaluation of Brain Tumor Segmentations on MR Images [0.0]
  This work presents a weakly supervised approach to segment anomalies in 2D magnetic resonance images. We train a generative adversarial network (GAN) that converts cancerous images to healthy variants. Non-cancerous variants can also be used to evaluate the segmentations in a weakly supervised fashion.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-11-10T00:04:46Z)
• Cascaded Robust Learning at Imperfect Labels for Chest X-ray Segmentation [61.09321488002978]
  We present a novel cascaded robust learning framework for chest X-ray segmentation with imperfect annotation. Our model consists of three independent network, which can effectively learn useful information from the peer networks. Our methods could achieve a significant improvement on the accuracy in segmentation tasks compared to the previous methods.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-04-05T15:50:16Z)
• Few-shot Medical Image Segmentation using a Global Correlation Network with Discriminative Embedding [60.89561661441736]
  We propose a novel method for few-shot medical image segmentation. We construct our few-shot image segmentor using a deep convolutional network trained episodically. We enhance discriminability of deep embedding to encourage clustering of the feature domains of the same class.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-12-10T04:01:07Z)
• Weakly-Supervised Segmentation for Disease Localization in Chest X-Ray Images [0.0]
  We propose a novel approach to the semantic segmentation of medical chest X-ray images with only image-level class labels as supervision. We show that this approach is applicable to chest X-rays for detecting an anomalous volume of air between the lung and the chest wall.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-07-01T20:48:35Z)
• Robust Medical Instrument Segmentation Challenge 2019 [56.148440125599905]
  Intraoperative tracking of laparoscopic instruments is often a prerequisite for computer and robotic-assisted interventions. Our challenge was based on a surgical data set comprising 10,040 annotated images acquired from a total of 30 surgical procedures. The results confirm the initial hypothesis, namely that algorithm performance degrades with an increasing domain gap.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-03-23T14:35:08Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.