Panoramic Learning with A Standardized Machine Learning Formalism

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2108.07783v1
• Date: Tue, 17 Aug 2021 17:44:38 GMT
• Title: Panoramic Learning with A Standardized Machine Learning Formalism
• Authors: Zhiting Hu, Eric P. Xing
• Abstract summary: This paper presents a standardized equation of the learning objective, that offers a unifying understanding of diverse ML algorithms. It also provides guidance for mechanic design of new ML solutions, and serves as a promising vehicle towards panoramic learning with all experiences.
• Score: 116.34627789412102
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Machine Learning (ML) is about computational methods that enable machines to learn concepts from experiences. In handling a wide variety of experiences ranging from data instances, knowledge, constraints, to rewards, adversaries, and lifelong interplay in an ever-growing spectrum of tasks, contemporary ML/AI research has resulted in a multitude of learning paradigms and methodologies. Despite the continual progresses on all different fronts, the disparate narrowly-focused methods also make standardized, composable, and reusable development of learning solutions difficult, and make it costly if possible to build AI agents that panoramically learn from all types of experiences. This paper presents a standardized ML formalism, in particular a standard equation of the learning objective, that offers a unifying understanding of diverse ML algorithms, making them special cases due to different choices of modeling components. The framework also provides guidance for mechanic design of new ML solutions, and serves as a promising vehicle towards panoramic learning with all experiences.

Related papers

• ICE-T: A Multi-Faceted Concept for Teaching Machine Learning [2.9685635948300004]
  We take a look at didactic principles that are employed for teaching computer science, define criteria, and evaluate a selection of prominent existing platforms, tools, and games. We criticize the approach of portraying Machine Learning mostly as a black-box and the resulting missing focus on creating an understanding of data, algorithms, and models. We present a concept that covers intermodal transfer, computational and explanatory thinking, ICE-T, as an extension of known didactic principles.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-11-08T09:16:05Z)
• Towards Trustworthy Machine Learning in Production: An Overview of the Robustness in MLOps Approach [0.0]
  In recent years, AI researchers and practitioners have introduced principles and guidelines to build systems that make reliable and trustworthy decisions. In practice, a fundamental challenge arises when the system needs to be operationalized and deployed to evolve and operate in real-life environments continuously. To address this challenge, Machine Learning Operations (MLOps) have emerged as a potential recipe for standardizing ML solutions in deployment.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-28T09:34:08Z)
• RA-BLIP: Multimodal Adaptive Retrieval-Augmented Bootstrapping Language-Image Pre-training [55.54020926284334]
  Multimodal Large Language Models (MLLMs) have recently received substantial interest, which shows their emerging potential as general-purpose models for various vision-language tasks. Retrieval augmentation techniques have proven to be effective plugins for both LLMs and MLLMs. In this study, we propose multimodal adaptive Retrieval-Augmented Bootstrapping Language-Image Pre-training (RA-BLIP), a novel retrieval-augmented framework for various MLLMs.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-18T03:45:19Z)
• Delving into Multi-modal Multi-task Foundation Models for Road Scene Understanding: From Learning Paradigm Perspectives [56.2139730920855]
  We present a systematic analysis of MM-VUFMs specifically designed for road scenes. Our objective is to provide a comprehensive overview of common practices, referring to task-specific models, unified multi-modal models, unified multi-task models, and foundation model prompting techniques. We provide insights into key challenges and future trends, such as closed-loop driving systems, interpretability, embodied driving agents, and world models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-05T12:47:09Z)
• MachineLearnAthon: An Action-Oriented Machine Learning Didactic Concept [34.6229719907685]
  This paper introduces the MachineLearnAthon format, an innovative didactic concept designed to be inclusive for students of different disciplines. At the heart of the concept lie ML challenges, which make use of industrial data sets to solve real-world problems. These cover the entire ML pipeline, promoting data literacy and practical skills, from data preparation, through deployment, to evaluation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-01-29T16:50:32Z)
• MinT: Boosting Generalization in Mathematical Reasoning via Multi-View Fine-Tuning [53.90744622542961]
  Reasoning in mathematical domains remains a significant challenge for small language models (LMs) We introduce a new method that exploits existing mathematical problem datasets with diverse annotation styles. Experimental results show that our strategy enables a LLaMA-7B model to outperform prior approaches.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-07-16T05:41:53Z)
• MLCopilot: Unleashing the Power of Large Language Models in Solving Machine Learning Tasks [31.733088105662876]
  We aim to bridge the gap between machine intelligence and human knowledge by introducing a novel framework. We showcase the possibility of extending the capability of LLMs to comprehend structured inputs and perform thorough reasoning for solving novel ML tasks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-04-28T17:03:57Z)
• Learning by Design: Structuring and Documenting the Human Choices in Machine Learning Development [6.903929927172917]
  We present a method consisting of eight design questions that outline the deliberation and normative choices going into creating a machine learning model. Our method affords several benefits, such as supporting critical assessment through methodological transparency. We believe that our method can help ML practitioners structure and justify their choices and assumptions when developing ML models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-05-03T08:47:45Z)
• Technology Readiness Levels for Machine Learning Systems [107.56979560568232]
  Development and deployment of machine learning systems can be executed easily with modern tools, but the process is typically rushed and means-to-an-end. We have developed a proven systems engineering approach for machine learning development and deployment. Our "Machine Learning Technology Readiness Levels" framework defines a principled process to ensure robust, reliable, and responsible systems.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-01-11T15:54:48Z)
• Technology Readiness Levels for AI & ML [79.22051549519989]
  Development of machine learning systems can be executed easily with modern tools, but the process is typically rushed and means-to-an-end. Engineering systems follow well-defined processes and testing standards to streamline development for high-quality, reliable results. We propose a proven systems engineering approach for machine learning development and deployment.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-06-21T17:14:34Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.