Quantum identity, content, and context: from classical to non-classical
logic
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2108.13545v1
- Date: Mon, 30 Aug 2021 23:05:16 GMT
- Title: Quantum identity, content, and context: from classical to non-classical
logic
- Authors: J. Acacio de Barros, Federico Holik, and D\'ecio Krause
- Abstract summary: We discuss content and context for quantum properties.
We argue that one could be in trouble in applying the classical theory of identity to the quantum domain.
- Score: 0.0
- License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
- Abstract: In this paper, we discuss content and context for quantum properties. We give
some examples of why quantum properties are problematic: they depend on the
context in a non-trivial way. We then connect this difficulty with properties
to the indistinguishability of elementary particles. We argue that one could be
in trouble in applying the classical theory of identity to the quantum domain
if we take indiscernibility as a core and fundamental concept. Thus, in
considering indistinguishability as such a fundamental notion, it implies, if
taken earnestly, that one should not apply standard logic to quantum objects.
Consequently, we end with a discussion about novel aspects this new mathematics
brings and how it relates to some issues associated with the quantum world's
ontology and the classical limit. We emphasize that, despite several different
ways of questioning classical logic in the quantum domain, our approach is
distinct. It involves one of the core concepts of classical logic, namely,
identity. So, we are in a different paradigm from standard quantum logics.
Related papers
- Which features of quantum physics are not fundamentally quantum but are due to indeterminism? [0.0]
We argue that most of the features, problems, and paradoxes attributed to quantum physics have a clear classical analogue.
What really characterizes quantum physics boils down only to phenomena that involve $hbar$, i.e., incompatible observables.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-09-16T18:00:01Z) - Quantum Entanglement Through the Lens of Paraconsistent Logic [0.0]
This paper presents an alternative approach to quantum entanglement, one that effectively resolves the logical inconsistencies without leading to logical contradictions.
By addressing some of the inconsistencies within quantum mechanics, such as state superposition and non-locality, our method is constructed on the principles of paraconsistent logic.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-05-14T17:10:20Z) - A computational test of quantum contextuality, and even simpler proofs of quantumness [43.25018099464869]
We show that an arbitrary contextuality game can be compiled into an operational "test of contextuality" involving a single quantum device.
Our work can be seen as using cryptography to enforce spatial separation within subsystems of a single quantum device.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-05-10T19:30:23Z) - On the Common Logical Structure of Classical and Quantum Mechanics [0.0]
We show that quantum theory does satisfy the classical distributivity law once the full meaning of quantum propositions is properly taken into account.
We show that the lattice of statistical propositions in classical mechanics follows the same structure, yielding an analogue non-commutative sublattice of classical propositions.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-06-21T18:31:53Z) - Quantum theory is logically inevitable [0.0]
We show that quantum theory requires the abandonment of classical logic.
We find an inevitable generalization of classical logic.
We illustrate this by applying the logic to explain puzzling results in quantum cognition.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-11-10T10:24:47Z) - Revisiting Quantum Mysteries [0.0]
In opposition to classical physics, it is impossible to say that an isolated quantum system "owns" a physical property.
Some properties of the system, its mass for example, belong to it in a sense close to that of classical physics.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-05-30T07:34:09Z) - Quantum Causal Inference in the Presence of Hidden Common Causes: an
Entropic Approach [34.77250498401055]
We put forth a new theoretical framework for merging quantum information science and causal inference by exploiting entropic principles.
We apply our proposed framework to an experimentally relevant scenario of identifying message senders on quantum noisy links.
This approach can lay the foundations of identifying originators of malicious activity on future multi-node quantum networks.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-04-24T22:45:50Z) - On quantum neural networks [91.3755431537592]
We argue that the concept of a quantum neural network should be defined in terms of its most general function.
Our reasoning is based on the use of the Feynman path integral formulation in quantum mechanics.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-04-12T18:30:30Z) - Operational Resource Theory of Imaginarity [48.7576911714538]
We show that quantum states are easier to create and manipulate if they only have real elements.
As an application, we show that imaginarity plays a crucial role for state discrimination.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-07-29T14:03:38Z) - Preferred basis, decoherence and a quantum state of the Universe [77.34726150561087]
We review a number of issues in foundations of quantum theory and quantum cosmology.
These issues can be considered as a part of the scientific legacy of H.D. Zeh.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-06-28T18:07:59Z) - From a quantum theory to a classical one [117.44028458220427]
We present and discuss a formal approach for describing the quantum to classical crossover.
The method was originally introduced by L. Yaffe in 1982 for tackling large-$N$ quantum field theories.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-04-01T09:16:38Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.