Related papers: Hocalarim: Mining Turkish Student Reviews

Hocalarim: Mining Turkish Student Reviews

URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2109.02325v1
Date: Mon, 6 Sep 2021 09:55:58 GMT
Title: Hocalarim: Mining Turkish Student Reviews
Authors: Ibrahim Faruk Ceylan, Necmettin Bera Calik, Mert Yapucuoglu and Ahmet Yavuz Uluslu
Abstract summary: We introduce Hocalarim (MyProfessors), the largest student review dataset available for the Turkish language. It consists of over 5000 professor reviews left online by students, with different aspects of education rated on a scale of 1 to 5 stars. We investigate the properties of the dataset and present its statistics.
Score: 0.0
License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
Abstract: We introduce Hocalarim (MyProfessors), the largest student review dataset available for the Turkish language. It consists of over 5000 professor reviews left online by students, with different aspects of education rated on a scale of 1 to 5 stars. We investigate the properties of the dataset and present its statistics. We examine the impact of students' institution type on their ratings and the correlation of students' bias to give positive or negative feedback.

Related papers

Stepwise Verification and Remediation of Student Reasoning Errors with Large Language Model Tutors [78.53699244846285]
Large language models (LLMs) present an opportunity to scale high-quality personalized education to all. LLMs struggle to precisely detect student's errors and tailor their feedback to these errors. Inspired by real-world teaching practice where teachers identify student errors and customize their response based on them, we focus on verifying student solutions.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-07-12T10:11:40Z)
Enhancing Students' Learning Process Through Self-Generated Tests [0.0]
This paper describes an educational experiment aimed at the promotion of students' autonomous learning. The main idea is to make the student feel part of the evaluation process by including students' questions in the evaluation exams. Questions uploaded by students are visible to every enrolled student as well as to each involved teacher.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-03-21T09:49:33Z)
Measuring Five Accountable Talk Moves to Improve Instruction at Scale [1.4549461207028445]
We fine-tune models to identify five instructional talk moves inspired by accountable talk theory. We correlate the instructors' use of each talk move with indicators of student engagement and satisfaction. These results corroborate previous research on the effectiveness of accountable talk moves.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-11-02T03:04:50Z)
Can Language Models Teach Weaker Agents? Teacher Explanations Improve Students via Personalization [84.86241161706911]
We show that teacher LLMs can indeed intervene on student reasoning to improve their performance. We also demonstrate that in multi-turn interactions, teacher explanations generalize and learn from explained data. We verify that misaligned teachers can lower student performance to random chance by intentionally misleading them.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-06-15T17:27:20Z)
MathDial: A Dialogue Tutoring Dataset with Rich Pedagogical Properties Grounded in Math Reasoning Problems [74.73881579517055]
We propose a framework to generate such dialogues by pairing human teachers with a Large Language Model prompted to represent common student errors. We describe how we use this framework to collect MathDial, a dataset of 3k one-to-one teacher-student tutoring dialogues.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-05-23T21:44:56Z)
SETSum: Summarization and Visualization of Student Evaluations of Teaching [74.76373136325032]
Student Evaluations of Teaching (SETs) are widely used in colleges and universities. SETSum provides organized illustrations of SET findings to instructors and other reviewers.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-07-08T01:40:11Z)
Large Scale Analysis of Open MOOC Reviews to Support Learners' Course Selection [17.376856503445826]
We analyze 2.4 million reviews (which is the largest MOOC reviews dataset used until now) from five different platforms. Results show that numeric ratings are clearly biased (63% of them are 5-star ratings) We expect our study to shed some light on the area and promote a more transparent approach in online education reviews.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-01-11T10:24:49Z)
Are Top School Students More Critical of Their Professors? Mining Comments on RateMyProfessor.com [83.2634062100579]
Student reviews and comments on RateMyProfessor.com reflect realistic learning experiences of students. Our study proves that student reviews and comments contain crucial information and can serve as essential references for enrollment in courses and universities.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-01-23T20:01:36Z)
Detecting Objectifying Language in Online Professor Reviews [4.05998151967271]
We describe two supervised text classifiers for detecting objectifying commentary in professor reviews. We ensemble these classifiers and use the resulting model to track objectifying commentary at scale. We measure correlations between objectifying commentary, changes to the review website interface, and teacher gender across a ten-year period.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-10-16T17:49:59Z)
Revealing the Hidden Patterns: A Comparative Study on Profiling Subpopulations of MOOC Students [61.58283466715385]
Massive Open Online Courses (MOOCs) exhibit a remarkable heterogeneity of students. The advent of complex "big data" from MOOC platforms is a challenging yet rewarding opportunity to deeply understand how students are engaged in MOOCs. We report on clustering analysis of student activities and comparative analysis on both behavioral patterns and demographical patterns between student subpopulations in the MOOC.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-08-12T10:38:50Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.