A Farewell to the Bias-Variance Tradeoff? An Overview of the Theory of Overparameterized Machine Learning

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2109.02355v1
• Date: Mon, 6 Sep 2021 10:48:40 GMT
• Title: A Farewell to the Bias-Variance Tradeoff? An Overview of the Theory of Overparameterized Machine Learning
• Authors: Yehuda Dar, Vidya Muthukumar, Richard G. Baraniuk
• Abstract summary: The rapid recent progress in machine learning (ML) has raised a number of scientific questions that challenge the longstanding dogma of the field. One of the most important riddles is the good empirical generalization of over parameterized models.
• Score: 37.01683478234978
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: The rapid recent progress in machine learning (ML) has raised a number of scientific questions that challenge the longstanding dogma of the field. One of the most important riddles is the good empirical generalization of overparameterized models. Overparameterized models are excessively complex with respect to the size of the training dataset, which results in them perfectly fitting (i.e., interpolating) the training data, which is usually noisy. Such interpolation of noisy data is traditionally associated with detrimental overfitting, and yet a wide range of interpolating models -- from simple linear models to deep neural networks -- have recently been observed to generalize extremely well on fresh test data. Indeed, the recently discovered double descent phenomenon has revealed that highly overparameterized models often improve over the best underparameterized model in test performance. Understanding learning in this overparameterized regime requires new theory and foundational empirical studies, even for the simplest case of the linear model. The underpinnings of this understanding have been laid in very recent analyses of overparameterized linear regression and related statistical learning tasks, which resulted in precise analytic characterizations of double descent. This paper provides a succinct overview of this emerging theory of overparameterized ML (henceforth abbreviated as TOPML) that explains these recent findings through a statistical signal processing perspective. We emphasize the unique aspects that define the TOPML research area as a subfield of modern ML theory and outline interesting open questions that remain.

Related papers

• SMILE: Zero-Shot Sparse Mixture of Low-Rank Experts Construction From Pre-Trained Foundation Models [85.67096251281191]
  We present an innovative approach to model fusion called zero-shot Sparse MIxture of Low-rank Experts (SMILE) construction. SMILE allows for the upscaling of source models into an MoE model without extra data or further training. We conduct extensive experiments across diverse scenarios, such as image classification and text generation tasks, using full fine-tuning and LoRA fine-tuning.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-08-19T17:32:15Z)
• Understanding Forgetting in Continual Learning with Linear Regression [21.8755265936716]
  Continual learning, focused on sequentially learning multiple tasks, has gained significant attention recently. We provide a general theoretical analysis of forgetting in the linear regression model via Gradient Descent. We demonstrate that, given a sufficiently large data size, the arrangement of tasks in a sequence, where tasks with larger eigenvalues in their population data covariance matrices are trained later, tends to result in increased forgetting.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-05-27T18:33:37Z)
• Diffusion posterior sampling for simulation-based inference in tall data settings [53.17563688225137]
  Simulation-based inference ( SBI) is capable of approximating the posterior distribution that relates input parameters to a given observation. In this work, we consider a tall data extension in which multiple observations are available to better infer the parameters of the model. We compare our method to recently proposed competing approaches on various numerical experiments and demonstrate its superiority in terms of numerical stability and computational cost.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-04-11T09:23:36Z)
• A PAC-Bayesian Perspective on the Interpolating Information Criterion [54.548058449535155]
  We show how a PAC-Bayes bound is obtained for a general class of models, characterizing factors which influence performance in the interpolating regime. We quantify how the test error for overparameterized models achieving effectively zero training error depends on the quality of the implicit regularization imposed by e.g. the combination of model, parameter-initialization scheme.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-11-13T01:48:08Z)
• Analysis of Interpolating Regression Models and the Double Descent Phenomenon [3.883460584034765]
  It is commonly assumed that models which interpolate noisy training data are poor to generalize. The best models obtained are overparametrized and the testing error exhibits the double descent behavior as the model order increases. We derive a result based on the behavior of the smallest singular value of the regression matrix that explains the peak location and the double descent shape of the testing error as a function of model order.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-04-17T09:44:33Z)
• Theoretical Characterization of the Generalization Performance of Overfitted Meta-Learning [70.52689048213398]
  This paper studies the performance of overfitted meta-learning under a linear regression model with Gaussian features. We find new and interesting properties that do not exist in single-task linear regression. Our analysis suggests that benign overfitting is more significant and easier to observe when the noise and the diversity/fluctuation of the ground truth of each training task are large.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-04-09T20:36:13Z)
• Nonparametric Functional Analysis of Generalized Linear Models Under Nonlinear Constraints [0.0]
  This article introduces a novel nonparametric methodology for Generalized Linear Models. It combines the strengths of the binary regression and latent variable formulations for categorical data. It extends recently published parametric versions of the methodology and generalizes it.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-10-11T04:49:59Z)
• Post-mortem on a deep learning contest: a Simpson's paradox and the complementary roles of scale metrics versus shape metrics [61.49826776409194]
  We analyze a corpus of models made publicly-available for a contest to predict the generalization accuracy of neural network (NN) models. We identify what amounts to a Simpson's paradox: where "scale" metrics perform well overall but perform poorly on sub partitions of the data. We present two novel shape metrics, one data-independent, and the other data-dependent, which can predict trends in the test accuracy of a series of NNs.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-06-01T19:19:49Z)
• The Predictive Normalized Maximum Likelihood for Over-parameterized Linear Regression with Norm Constraint: Regret and Double Descent [12.929639356256928]
  We show that modern machine learning models do not obey a trade-off between the complexity of a prediction rule and its ability to generalize. We use the recently proposed predictive normalized maximum likelihood (pNML) which is the min-max regret solution for individual data. We demonstrate the use of the pNML regret as a point-wise learnability measure on synthetic data and that it can successfully predict the double-decent phenomenon.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-02-14T15:49:04Z)
• Provable Benefits of Overparameterization in Model Compression: From Double Descent to Pruning Neural Networks [38.153825455980645]
  Recent empirical evidence indicates that the practice of overization not only benefits training large models, but also assists - perhaps counterintuitively - building lightweight models. This paper sheds light on these empirical findings by theoretically characterizing the high-dimensional toolsets of model pruning. We analytically identify regimes in which, even if the location of the most informative features is known, we are better off fitting a large model and then pruning.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-12-16T05:13:30Z)
• Good Classifiers are Abundant in the Interpolating Regime [64.72044662855612]
  We develop a methodology to compute precisely the full distribution of test errors among interpolating classifiers. We find that test errors tend to concentrate around a small typical value $varepsilon*$, which deviates substantially from the test error of worst-case interpolating model. Our results show that the usual style of analysis in statistical learning theory may not be fine-grained enough to capture the good generalization performance observed in practice.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-06-22T21:12:31Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.