Making Online Communities 'Better': A Taxonomy of Community Values on Reddit

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2109.05152v3
• Date: Wed, 20 Sep 2023 22:49:43 GMT
• Title: Making Online Communities 'Better': A Taxonomy of Community Values on Reddit
• Authors: Galen Weld, Amy X. Zhang, Tim Althoff
• Abstract summary: We present the first study that elicits values directly from members across a diverse set of communities. We develop and validate a comprehensive taxonomy of community values, consisting of 29 subcategories within nine top-level categories. Using our taxonomy, we reframe existing research problems, such as managing influxes of new members, as tensions between different values.
• Score: 16.95132030488259
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
• Abstract: Many researchers studying online communities seek to make them better. However, beyond a small set of widely-held values, such as combating misinformation and abuse, determining what 'better' means can be challenging, as community members may disagree, values may be in conflict, and different communities may have differing preferences as a whole. In this work, we present the first study that elicits values directly from members across a diverse set of communities. We survey 212 members of 627 unique subreddits and ask them to describe their values for their communities in their own words. Through iterative categorization of 1,481 responses, we develop and validate a comprehensive taxonomy of community values, consisting of 29 subcategories within nine top-level categories, enabling principled, quantitative study of community values by researchers. Using our taxonomy, we reframe existing research problems, such as managing influxes of new members, as tensions between different values, and we identify understudied values, such as those regarding content quality and community size. We call for greater attention to vulnerable community members' values, and we make our codebook public for use in future research.

Related papers

• ValueScope: Unveiling Implicit Norms and Values via Return Potential Model of Social Interactions [47.85181608392683]
  We employ ValueScope to dissect and analyze linguistic and stylistic expressions across 13 Reddit communities. Our analysis provides a quantitative foundation showing that even closely related communities exhibit remarkably diverse norms.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-07-02T17:51:27Z)
• Investigating Human Values in Online Communities [42.63499582400051]
  This paper proposes a computational application of Schwartz's values framework to Reddit. We automatically annotate six million posts across 10,000 subreddits with Schwartz values. Our analysis unveils both previously recorded and novel insights into the values prevalent within various online communities.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-21T23:31:28Z)
• Is it easier to count communities than find them? [82.90505487525533]
  We consider certain hypothesis testing problems between models with different community structures. We show that testing between two options is as hard as finding the communities.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-12-21T09:35:19Z)
• Non-Polar Opposites: Analyzing the Relationship Between Echo Chambers and Hostile Intergroup Interactions on Reddit [66.09950457847242]
  We study the activity of 5.97M Reddit users and 421M comments posted over 13 years. We create a typology of relationships between political communities based on whether their users are toxic to each other.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-11-25T22:17:07Z)
• Learning to Adapt Domain Shifts of Moral Values via Instance Weighting [74.94940334628632]
  Classifying moral values in user-generated text from social media is critical to understanding community cultures. Moral values and language usage can change across the social movements. We propose a neural adaptation framework via instance weighting to improve cross-domain classification tasks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-04-15T18:15:41Z)
• Co-Membership-based Generic Anomalous Communities Detection [0.0]
  We introduce the Co-Membership-based Generic Anomalous Communities Detection Algorithm (referred as to CMMAC) CMMAC is domain-free and almost unaffected by communities' sizes and densities. We present an algorithm for generating a community-structured random network enabling the infusion of anomalous communities.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-03-30T12:23:55Z)
• This Must Be the Place: Predicting Engagement of Online Communities in a Large-scale Distributed Campaign [70.69387048368849]
  We study the behavior of communities with millions of active members. We develop a hybrid model, combining textual cues, community meta-data, and structural properties. We demonstrate the applicability of our model through Reddit's r/place a large-scale online experiment.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-01-14T08:23:16Z)
• No Community Can Do Everything: Why People Participate in Similar Online Communities [8.295851213681816]
  We provide an answer grounded in the analysis of 20 interviews with active participants in clusters of highly related subreddits. Within a broad topical area, there are a diversity of benefits an online community can confer. Our findings suggest that topical areas within an online community platform tend to become populated by groups of specialized communities.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-01-12T02:03:45Z)
• What Makes Online Communities 'Better'? Measuring Values, Consensus, and Conflict across Thousands of Subreddits [13.585903247791094]
  We measure community values through the first large-scale survey of community values, including 2,769 reddit users in 2,151 unique subreddits. We show that community members disagree about how safe their communities are, that longstanding communities place 30.1% more importance on trustworthiness than newer communities. These findings have important implications, including suggesting that care must be taken to protect vulnerable community members.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-11-10T18:31:22Z)
• Keeping Community in the Loop: Understanding Wikipedia Stakeholder Values for Machine Learning-Based Systems [14.808971334949119]
  We take a Value-Sensitive Algorithm Design approach to understanding a community-created and -maintained machine learning-based algorithm called the Objective Revision Evaluation System (ORES) ORES is a quality prediction system used in numerous Wikipedia applications and contexts.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-01-14T16:30:25Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.