Beyond the Individual: A Community-Engaged Framework for Ethical Online Community Research

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2503.13752v1
• Date: Mon, 17 Mar 2025 22:19:10 GMT
• Title: Beyond the Individual: A Community-Engaged Framework for Ethical Online Community Research
• Authors: Matthew Zent, Seraphina Yong, Dhruv Bala, Stevie Chancellor, Joseph A. Konstan, Loren Terveen, Svetlana Yarosh,
• Abstract summary: This paper investigates community-level harms and benefits of online community research.<n>We found researchers should engage more directly with communities' primary purpose.<n>We present the FACTORS (Functions for Action with Communities: Teaching, Overseeing, Reciprocating, and Sustaining) framework for ethical online community research.
• Score: 13.303662246462041
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: Online community research routinely poses minimal risk to individuals, but does the same hold true for online communities? In response to high-profile breaches of online community trust and increased debate in the social computing research community on the ethics of online community research, this paper investigates community-level harms and benefits of research. Through 9 participatory-inspired workshops with four critical online communities (Wikipedia, InTheRooms, CaringBridge, and r/AskHistorians) we found researchers should engage more directly with communities' primary purpose by rationalizing their methods and contributions in the context of community goals to equalize the beneficiaries of community research. To facilitate deeper alignment of these expectations, we present the FACTORS (Functions for Action with Communities: Teaching, Overseeing, Reciprocating, and Sustaining) framework for ethical online community research. Finally, we reflect on our findings by providing implications for researchers and online communities to identify and implement functions for navigating community-level harms and benefits.

Related papers

• Persuasion with Large Language Models: a Survey [49.86930318312291]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) have created new disruptive possibilities for persuasive communication. In areas such as politics, marketing, public health, e-commerce, and charitable giving, such LLM Systems have already achieved human-level or even super-human persuasiveness. Our survey suggests that the current and future potential of LLM-based persuasion poses profound ethical and societal risks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-11-11T10:05:52Z)
• ValueScope: Unveiling Implicit Norms and Values via Return Potential Model of Social Interactions [47.85181608392683]
  We employ ValueScope to dissect and analyze linguistic and stylistic expressions across 13 Reddit communities. Our analysis provides a quantitative foundation showing that even closely related communities exhibit remarkably diverse norms.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-07-02T17:51:27Z)
• Echo-chambers and Idea Labs: Communication Styles on Twitter [51.13560635563004]
  This paper investigates the communication styles and structures of Twitter (X) communities within the vaccination context. By shedding light on the nuanced nature of communication within social networks, this study emphasizes the significance of understanding the diversity of perspectives within online communities.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-03-28T13:55:51Z)
• Community Archetypes: An Empirical Framework for Guiding Research Methodologies to Reflect User Experiences of Sense of Virtual Community [22.86975187254343]
  We interviewed 21 researchers to understand how they study "community" on Reddit. We surveyed 12 subreddits to gain insight into user experiences of SOVC. Some research methods can broadly reflect users' SOVC regardless of the topic or type of subreddit.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-04T01:28:17Z)
• With Flying Colors: Predicting Community Success in Large-scale Collaborative Campaigns [2.487445341407889]
  We study the correspondence between the effectiveness of a community, measured by its success level in a competitive online campaign, and the dynamics between its members. To this end, we define a novel task: predicting the success level of online communities in Reddit's r/place.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-07-18T21:43:37Z)
• Non-Polar Opposites: Analyzing the Relationship Between Echo Chambers and Hostile Intergroup Interactions on Reddit [66.09950457847242]
  We study the activity of 5.97M Reddit users and 421M comments posted over 13 years. We create a typology of relationships between political communities based on whether their users are toxic to each other.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-11-25T22:17:07Z)
• A Systematic Review and Thematic Analysis of Community-Collaborative Approaches to Computing Research [5.622570141268158]
  We conducted a systematic review and thematic analysis of 47 computing research papers discussing participatory research with communities. We identified seven themes associated with the evolution of a project: from establishing community partnerships to sustaining results. Our findings suggest that several tensions characterize these projects, many of which relate to the power and position of researchers.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-07-09T01:38:15Z)
• This Must Be the Place: Predicting Engagement of Online Communities in a Large-scale Distributed Campaign [70.69387048368849]
  We study the behavior of communities with millions of active members. We develop a hybrid model, combining textual cues, community meta-data, and structural properties. We demonstrate the applicability of our model through Reddit's r/place a large-scale online experiment.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-01-14T08:23:16Z)
• Empowering Local Communities Using Artificial Intelligence [70.17085406202368]
  It has become an important topic to explore the impact of AI on society from a people-centered perspective. Previous works in citizen science have identified methods of using AI to engage the public in research. This article discusses the challenges of applying AI in Community Citizen Science.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-10-05T12:51:11Z)
• Making Online Communities 'Better': A Taxonomy of Community Values on Reddit [16.95132030488259]
  We present the first study that elicits values directly from members across a diverse set of communities. We develop and validate a comprehensive taxonomy of community values, consisting of 29 subcategories within nine top-level categories. Using our taxonomy, we reframe existing research problems, such as managing influxes of new members, as tensions between different values.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-09-11T01:49:08Z)
• Exploring the social influence of Kaggle virtual community on the M5 competition [6.1104336589432595]
  M5 was held on Kaggle, an online community of data scientists and machine learning practitioners. We first study the content of the M5 virtual community by topic modeling and trend analysis. We perform social media analysis to identify the potential relationship network of the virtual community.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-02-28T13:15:50Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.