Text as Causal Mediators: Research Design for Causal Estimates of Differential Treatment of Social Groups via Language Aspects

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2109.07542v1
• Date: Wed, 15 Sep 2021 19:15:35 GMT
• Title: Text as Causal Mediators: Research Design for Causal Estimates of Differential Treatment of Social Groups via Language Aspects
• Authors: Katherine A. Keith, Douglas Rice, and Brendan O'Connor
• Abstract summary: We propose a causal research design for observational (non-experimental) data to estimate the natural direct and indirect effects of social group signals on speakers' responses. We illustrate the promises and challenges of this framework via a theoretical case study of the effect of an advocate's gender on interruptions from justices during U.S. Supreme Court oral arguments.
• Score: 7.175621752912443
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Using observed language to understand interpersonal interactions is important in high-stakes decision making. We propose a causal research design for observational (non-experimental) data to estimate the natural direct and indirect effects of social group signals (e.g. race or gender) on speakers' responses with separate aspects of language as causal mediators. We illustrate the promises and challenges of this framework via a theoretical case study of the effect of an advocate's gender on interruptions from justices during U.S. Supreme Court oral arguments. We also discuss challenges conceptualizing and operationalizing causal variables such as gender and language that comprise of many components, and we articulate technical open challenges such as temporal dependence between language mediators in conversational settings.

Related papers

• Multilingual Dyadic Interaction Corpus NoXi+J: Toward Understanding Asian-European Non-verbal Cultural Characteristics and their Influences on Engagement [6.984291346424792]
  We conduct a multilingual computational analysis of non-verbal features and investigate their role in engagement prediction. We extracted multimodal non-verbal features, including speech acoustics, facial expressions, backchanneling and gestures. We analyzed the influence of cultural differences in the input features of LSTM models trained to predict engagement for five language datasets.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-09-09T18:37:34Z)
• To Drop or Not to Drop? Predicting Argument Ellipsis Judgments: A Case Study in Japanese [26.659122101710068]
  We study whether and why a particular argument should be omitted across over 2,000 data points in the balanced corpus of Japanese. The data indicate that native speakers overall share common criteria for such judgments. The gap between the systems' prediction and human judgments in specific linguistic aspects is revealed.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-04-17T12:26:52Z)
• Quantifying the Dialect Gap and its Correlates Across Languages [69.18461982439031]
  This work will lay the foundation for furthering the field of dialectal NLP by laying out evident disparities and identifying possible pathways for addressing them through mindful data collection.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-23T17:42:01Z)
• DiPlomat: A Dialogue Dataset for Situated Pragmatic Reasoning [89.92601337474954]
  Pragmatic reasoning plays a pivotal role in deciphering implicit meanings that frequently arise in real-life conversations. We introduce a novel challenge, DiPlomat, aiming at benchmarking machines' capabilities on pragmatic reasoning and situated conversational understanding.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-06-15T10:41:23Z)
• Naturalistic Causal Probing for Morpho-Syntax [76.83735391276547]
  We suggest a naturalistic strategy for input-level intervention on real world data in Spanish. Using our approach, we isolate morpho-syntactic features from counfounders in sentences. We apply this methodology to analyze causal effects of gender and number on contextualized representations extracted from pre-trained models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-05-14T11:47:58Z)
• Analyzing Gender Representation in Multilingual Models [59.21915055702203]
  We focus on the representation of gender distinctions as a practical case study. We examine the extent to which the gender concept is encoded in shared subspaces across different languages.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-04-20T00:13:01Z)
• Some Reflections on Drawing Causal Inference using Textual Data: Parallels Between Human Subjects and Organized Texts [5.28584552391588]
  We examine the role of textual data as study units when conducting causal inference. We elaborate on key causal concepts and principles, and expose some ambiguity and sometimes fallacies.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-02-02T01:54:04Z)
• Exploring Discourse Structures for Argument Impact Classification [48.909640432326654]
  This paper empirically shows that the discourse relations between two arguments along the context path are essential factors for identifying the persuasive power of an argument. We propose DisCOC to inject and fuse the sentence-level structural information with contextualized features derived from large-scale language models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-06-02T06:49:19Z)
• Who Responded to Whom: The Joint Effects of Latent Topics and Discourse in Conversation Structure [53.77234444565652]
  We identify the responding relations in the conversation discourse, which link response utterances to their initiations. We propose a model to learn latent topics and discourse in word distributions, and predict pairwise initiation-response links. Experimental results on both English and Chinese conversations show that our model significantly outperforms the previous state of the arts.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-04-17T17:46:00Z)
• Quantifying the Causal Effects of Conversational Tendencies [17.506263520769927]
  Drawing causal links between conversational behaviors and outcomes is a necessary step in using them in a prescriptive fashion. We focus on the task of determining a particular type of policy for a text-based crisis counseling platform. We show how to circumvent these inference challenges in our particular domain.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-09-08T18:00:00Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.