Language Mixing in Reasoning Language Models: Patterns, Impact, and Internal Causes

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2505.14815v1
• Date: Tue, 20 May 2025 18:26:53 GMT
• Title: Language Mixing in Reasoning Language Models: Patterns, Impact, and Internal Causes
• Authors: Mingyang Wang, Lukas Lange, Heike Adel, Yunpu Ma, Jannik Strötgen, Hinrich Schütze,
• Abstract summary: Reasoning language models (RLMs) excel at complex tasks by leveraging a chain-of-thought process to generate structured intermediate steps.<n> Language mixing, i.e., reasoning steps containing tokens from languages other than the prompt, has been observed in their outputs and shown to affect performance.<n>We present the first systematic study of language mixing in RLMs, examining its patterns, impact, and internal causes across 15 languages.
• Score: 49.770097731093216
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: Reasoning language models (RLMs) excel at complex tasks by leveraging a chain-of-thought process to generate structured intermediate steps. However, language mixing, i.e., reasoning steps containing tokens from languages other than the prompt, has been observed in their outputs and shown to affect performance, though its impact remains debated. We present the first systematic study of language mixing in RLMs, examining its patterns, impact, and internal causes across 15 languages, 7 task difficulty levels, and 18 subject areas, and show how all three factors influence language mixing. Moreover, we demonstrate that the choice of reasoning language significantly affects performance: forcing models to reason in Latin or Han scripts via constrained decoding notably improves accuracy. Finally, we show that the script composition of reasoning traces closely aligns with that of the model's internal representations, indicating that language mixing reflects latent processing preferences in RLMs. Our findings provide actionable insights for optimizing multilingual reasoning and open new directions for controlling reasoning languages to build more interpretable and adaptable RLMs.

Related papers

• IMPACT: Inflectional Morphology Probes Across Complex Typologies [0.0]
  IMPACT is a synthetically generated evaluation framework focused on inflectional morphology.<n>It is designed to evaluate performance across five morphologically rich languages: Arabic, Russian, Finnish, Turkish, and Hebrew.<n>We assess eight multilingual LLMs that, despite strong English performance, struggle with other languages and uncommon morphological patterns.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-06-30T14:58:23Z)
• Language Surgery in Multilingual Large Language Models [32.77326546076424]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) have demonstrated remarkable generalization capabilities across tasks and languages.<n>This paper investigates the naturally emerging representation alignment in LLMs, particularly in the middle layers.<n>We propose Inference-Time Language Control (ITLC) to enable precise cross-lingual language control and mitigate language confusion.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-06-14T11:09:50Z)
• Cross-lingual Collapse: How Language-Centric Foundation Models Shape Reasoning in Large Language Models [44.94287386776289]
  We identify textbfCross-lingual Collapse, a systematic drift in which a multilingual language model reverts to its dominant pre-training language.<n>Our experiments reveal three key findings: (i) GRPO rapidly amplifies pre-training language imbalances, leading to the erosion of low-resource languages within just a few hundred updates; (ii) language consistency reward mitigates this drift but does so at the expense of an almost 5 - 10 pp drop in accuracy.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-06-06T08:08:48Z)
• Do LLMs Need to Think in One Language? Correlation between Latent Language and Task Performance [38.785363522684385]
  We study how the discrepancy between the latent language and the input and output language affects downstream task performance.<n>Our work varies the input prompt languages across multiple downstream tasks and analyzes the correlation between consistency in latent language and task performance.<n> Experimental results indicate that maintaining consistency in latent language is not always necessary for optimal downstream task performance.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-05-27T17:30:57Z)
• Language Matters: How Do Multilingual Input and Reasoning Paths Affect Large Reasoning Models? [59.970391602080205]
  Despite multilingual training, LRMs tend to default to reasoning in high-resource languages at test time.<n>Cultural reasoning degrades performance on reasoning tasks but benefits cultural tasks, while safety evaluations exhibit language-specific behavior.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-05-23T02:46:18Z)
• Mechanistic Understanding and Mitigation of Language Confusion in English-Centric Large Language Models [49.09746599881631]
  We present the first mechanistic interpretability study of language confusion.<n>We show that confusion points (CPs) are central to this phenomenon.<n>We show that editing a small set of critical neurons, identified via comparative analysis with multilingual-tuned models, substantially mitigates confusion.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-05-22T11:29:17Z)
• When Less Language is More: Language-Reasoning Disentanglement Makes LLMs Better Multilingual Reasoners [111.50503126693444]
  We show that language-specific ablation consistently boosts multilingual reasoning performance.<n>Compared to post-training, our training-free ablation achieves comparable or superior results with minimal computational overhead.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-05-21T08:35:05Z)
• LINGOLY-TOO: Disentangling Memorisation from Reasoning with Linguistic Templatisation and Orthographic Obfuscation [1.2576388595811496]
  We introduce a framework for producing linguistic reasoning problems that reduces the effect of memorisation in model performance estimates.<n>We apply this framework to develop LINGOLY-TOO, a challenging benchmark for linguistic reasoning.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-03-04T19:57:47Z)
• Demystifying Multilingual Chain-of-Thought in Process Reward Modeling [71.12193680015622]
  We tackle the challenge of extending process reward models (PRMs) to multilingual settings.<n>We train multilingual PRMs on a dataset spanning seven languages, which is translated from English.<n>Our results highlight the sensitivity of multilingual PRMs to both the number of training languages and the volume of English data.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-02-18T09:11:44Z)
• Balanced Multi-Factor In-Context Learning for Multilingual Large Language Models [53.38288894305388]
  Multilingual large language models (MLLMs) are able to leverage in-context learning (ICL) to achieve high performance by leveraging cross-lingual knowledge transfer without parameter updates.<n>Three key factors influence multilingual ICL: (1) semantic similarity, (2) linguistic alignment, and (3) language-specific performance.<n>We propose balanced multi-factor ICL (textbfBMF-ICL), a method that quantifies and optimally balances these factors for improved example selection.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-02-17T06:56:33Z)
• The Power of Question Translation Training in Multilingual Reasoning: Broadened Scope and Deepened Insights [108.40766216456413]
  We propose a question alignment framework to bridge the gap between large language models' English and non-English performance. Experiment results show it can boost multilingual performance across diverse reasoning scenarios, model families, and sizes. We analyze representation space, generated response and data scales, and reveal how question translation training strengthens language alignment within LLMs.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-05-02T14:49:50Z)
• Cross-Lingual Ability of Multilingual Masked Language Models: A Study of Language Structure [54.01613740115601]
  We study three language properties: constituent order, composition and word co-occurrence. Our main conclusion is that the contribution of constituent order and word co-occurrence is limited, while the composition is more crucial to the success of cross-linguistic transfer.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-03-16T07:09:35Z)
• On the Language-specificity of Multilingual BERT and the Impact of Fine-tuning [7.493779672689531]
  The knowledge acquired by multilingual BERT (mBERT) has two components: a language-specific and a language-neutral one. This paper analyses the relationship between them, in the context of fine-tuning on two tasks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-09-14T19:28:31Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.