Inspecting the Factuality of Hallucinated Entities in Abstractive Summarization

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2109.09784v1
• Date: Mon, 30 Aug 2021 15:40:52 GMT
• Title: Inspecting the Factuality of Hallucinated Entities in Abstractive Summarization
• Authors: Meng Cao, Yue Dong and Jackie Chi Kit Cheung
• Abstract summary: State-of-the-art abstractive summarization systems often generate emphhallucinations; i.e., content that is not directly inferable from the source text. We propose a novel detection approach that separates factual from non-factual hallucinations of entities.
• Score: 36.052622624166894
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: State-of-the-art abstractive summarization systems often generate \emph{hallucinations}; i.e., content that is not directly inferable from the source text. Despite being assumed incorrect, many of the hallucinated contents are consistent with world knowledge (factual hallucinations). Including these factual hallucinations into a summary can be beneficial in providing additional background information. In this work, we propose a novel detection approach that separates factual from non-factual hallucinations of entities. Our method is based on an entity's prior and posterior probabilities according to pre-trained and finetuned masked language models, respectively. Empirical results suggest that our method vastly outperforms three strong baselines in both accuracy and F1 scores and has a strong correlation with human judgments on factuality classification tasks. Furthermore, our approach can provide insight into whether a particular hallucination is caused by the summarizer's pre-training or fine-tuning step.

Related papers

• Trust Me, I'm Wrong: High-Certainty Hallucinations in LLMs [45.13670875211498]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) often generate outputs that lack grounding in real-world facts, a phenomenon known as hallucinations. We show that models can hallucinate with high certainty even when they have the correct knowledge.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-02-18T15:46:31Z)
• Can Your Uncertainty Scores Detect Hallucinated Entity? [14.432545893757677]
  We propose a new data set, HalluEntity, which annotates hallucination at the entity level. Based on the dataset, we evaluate uncertainty-based hallucination detection approaches across 17 modern LLMs. Our experimental results show that uncertainty estimation approaches focusing on individual token probabilities tend to over-predict hallucinations.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-02-17T16:01:41Z)
• Valuable Hallucinations: Realizable Non-realistic Propositions [2.451326684641447]
  This paper introduces the first formal definition of valuable hallucinations in large language models (LLMs) We focus on the potential value that certain types of hallucinations can offer in specific contexts. We present experiments using the Qwen2.5 model and HalluQA dataset, employing ReAct prompting to control and optimize hallucinations.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-02-16T12:59:11Z)
• Knowledge Overshadowing Causes Amalgamated Hallucination in Large Language Models [65.32990889402927]
  We coin this phenomenon as knowledge overshadowing'' We show that the hallucination rate grows with both the imbalance ratio and the length of dominant condition description. We propose to utilize overshadowing conditions as a signal to catch hallucination before it is produced.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-07-10T20:37:42Z)
• On Large Language Models' Hallucination with Regard to Known Facts [74.96789694959894]
  Large language models are successful in answering factoid questions but are also prone to hallucination. We investigate the phenomenon of LLMs possessing correct answer knowledge yet still hallucinating from the perspective of inference dynamics. Our study shed light on understanding the reasons for LLMs' hallucinations on their known facts, and more importantly, on accurately predicting when they are hallucinating.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-03-29T06:48:30Z)
• In-Context Sharpness as Alerts: An Inner Representation Perspective for Hallucination Mitigation [36.31646727970656]
  Large language models (LLMs) frequently hallucinate and produce factual errors. correct generations tend to have sharper context activations in the hidden states of the in-context tokens, compared to the incorrect ones. We propose an entropy-based metric to quantify the sharpness'' among the in-context hidden states and incorporate it into the decoding process.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-03-03T15:53:41Z)
• Hal-Eval: A Universal and Fine-grained Hallucination Evaluation Framework for Large Vision Language Models [35.45859414670449]
  We introduce a refined taxonomy of hallucinations, featuring a new category: Event Hallucination. We then utilize advanced LLMs to generate and filter fine grained hallucinatory data consisting of various types of hallucinations. The proposed benchmark distinctively assesses LVLMs ability to tackle a broad spectrum of hallucinations.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-24T05:14:52Z)
• Fine-grained Hallucination Detection and Editing for Language Models [109.56911670376932]
  Large language models (LMs) are prone to generate factual errors, which are often called hallucinations. We introduce a comprehensive taxonomy of hallucinations and argue that hallucinations manifest in diverse forms. We propose a novel task of automatic fine-grained hallucination detection and construct a new evaluation benchmark, FavaBench.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-01-12T19:02:48Z)
• HalluciDoctor: Mitigating Hallucinatory Toxicity in Visual Instruction Data [102.56792377624927]
  hallucinations inherent in machine-generated data remain under-explored. We present a novel hallucination detection and elimination framework, HalluciDoctor, based on the cross-checking paradigm. Our method successfully mitigates 44.6% hallucinations relatively and maintains competitive performance compared to LLaVA.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-11-22T04:52:58Z)
• Don't Say What You Don't Know: Improving the Consistency of Abstractive Summarization by Constraining Beam Search [54.286450484332505]
  We analyze the connection between hallucinations and training data, and find evidence that models hallucinate because they train on target summaries that are unsupported by the source. We present PINOCCHIO, a new decoding method that improves the consistency of a transformer-based abstractive summarizer by constraining beam search to avoid hallucinations.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-03-16T07:13:52Z)
• On Hallucination and Predictive Uncertainty in Conditional Language Generation [76.18783678114325]
  Higher predictive uncertainty corresponds to a higher chance of hallucination. Epistemic uncertainty is more indicative of hallucination than aleatoric or total uncertainties. It helps to achieve better results of trading performance in standard metric for less hallucination with the proposed beam search variant.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-03-28T00:32:27Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.