Using Sociolinguistic Variables to Reveal Changing Attitudes Towards
Sexuality and Gender
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2109.11061v1
- Date: Wed, 22 Sep 2021 22:28:07 GMT
- Title: Using Sociolinguistic Variables to Reveal Changing Attitudes Towards
Sexuality and Gender
- Abstract summary: We use a sociolinguistic lexical variable to test for change in the United States towards sexuality and gender.
The linguistic choices in each variable allow us to study increased rates of acceptances of gay marriage and gender equality.
In longitudinal analyses across Twitter and Reddit over 87M messages, we demonstrate that attitudes are changing but that these changes are driven by specific demographics within the United States.
- Score: 5.71097144710995
- License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
- Abstract: Individuals signal aspects of their identity and beliefs through linguistic
choices. Studying these choices in aggregate allows us to examine large-scale
attitude shifts within a population. Here, we develop computational methods to
study word choice within a sociolinguistic lexical variable -- alternate words
used to express the same concept -- in order to test for change in the United
States towards sexuality and gender. We examine two variables: i) referents to
significant others, such as the word "partner" and ii) referents to an
indefinite person, both of which could optionally be marked with gender. The
linguistic choices in each variable allow us to study increased rates of
acceptances of gay marriage and gender equality, respectively. In longitudinal
analyses across Twitter and Reddit over 87M messages, we demonstrate that
attitudes are changing but that these changes are driven by specific
demographics within the United States. Further, in a quasi-causal analysis, we
show that passages of Marriage Equality Acts in different states are drivers of
linguistic change.
Related papers
- Gender Inequality in English Textbooks Around the World: an NLP Approach [0.0]
This study applies natural language processing methods to quantify gender inequality in English textbooks from 22 countries across 7 cultural spheres.<n> Metrics include character count, firstness (which gender is mentioned first), and TF-IDF word associations by gender.<n>Results show consistent overrepresentation of male characters in terms of count, firstness, and named entities.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-06-03T04:16:09Z) - Beyond Binary Gender: Evaluating Gender-Inclusive Machine Translation with Ambiguous Attitude Words [85.48043537327258]
Existing machine translation gender bias evaluations are primarily focused on male and female genders.
This study presents a benchmark AmbGIMT (Gender-Inclusive Machine Translation with Ambiguous attitude words)
We propose a novel process to evaluate gender bias based on the Emotional Attitude Score (EAS), which is used to quantify ambiguous attitude words.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-07-23T08:13:51Z) - Evaluation of Large Language Models: STEM education and Gender Stereotypes [2.1600200859609178]
This paper investigates gender biases in large language models (LLMs) in relation to educational choices through an open-ended, true to user-case experimental design and a quantitative analysis.
We find significant and large differences in the ratio of STEM to non-STEM suggested education paths provided by chatGPT when using typical girl vs boy names.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-06-14T15:42:42Z) - A Multilingual Perspective on Probing Gender Bias [0.0]
Gender bias is a form of systematic negative treatment that targets individuals based on their gender.
This thesis investigates the nuances of how gender bias is expressed through language and within language technologies.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-03-15T21:35:21Z) - The Causal Influence of Grammatical Gender on Distributional Semantics [87.8027818528463]
How much meaning influences gender assignment across languages is an active area of research in linguistics and cognitive science.
We offer a novel, causal graphical model that jointly represents the interactions between a noun's grammatical gender, its meaning, and adjective choice.
When we control for the meaning of the noun, the relationship between grammatical gender and adjective choice is near zero and insignificant.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-11-30T13:58:13Z) - Analyzing Gender Representation in Multilingual Models [59.21915055702203]
We focus on the representation of gender distinctions as a practical case study.
We examine the extent to which the gender concept is encoded in shared subspaces across different languages.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-04-20T00:13:01Z) - Quantifying Gender Bias Towards Politicians in Cross-Lingual Language
Models [104.41668491794974]
We quantify the usage of adjectives and verbs generated by language models surrounding the names of politicians as a function of their gender.
We find that while some words such as dead, and designated are associated with both male and female politicians, a few specific words such as beautiful and divorced are predominantly associated with female politicians.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-04-15T15:03:26Z) - They, Them, Theirs: Rewriting with Gender-Neutral English [56.14842450974887]
We perform a case study on the singular they, a common way to promote gender inclusion in English.
We show how a model can be trained to produce gender-neutral English with 1% word error rate with no human-labeled data.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-02-12T21:47:48Z) - Pick a Fight or Bite your Tongue: Investigation of Gender Differences in
Idiomatic Language Usage [9.892162266128306]
We compile a novel, large and diverse corpus of spontaneous linguistic productions annotated with speakers' gender.
We perform a first large-scale empirical study of distinctions in the usage of textitfigurative language between male and female authors.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-10-31T18:44:07Z) - Multilingual Contextual Affective Analysis of LGBT People Portrayals in
Wikipedia [34.183132688084534]
Specific lexical choices in narrative text reflect both the writer's attitudes towards people in the narrative and influence the audience's reactions.
We show how word connotations differ across languages and cultures, highlighting the difficulty of generalizing existing English datasets.
We then demonstrate the usefulness of our method by analyzing Wikipedia biography pages of members of the LGBT community across three languages.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-10-21T08:27:36Z) - Language, communication and society: a gender based linguistics analysis [0.0]
The purpose of this study is to find evidence for supporting the hypothesis that language is the mirror of our thinking.
The answers have been analysed to see if gender stereotypes were present such as the attribution of psychological and behavioural characteristics.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-07-14T08:38:37Z) - Gender Bias in Multilingual Embeddings and Cross-Lingual Transfer [101.58431011820755]
We study gender bias in multilingual embeddings and how it affects transfer learning for NLP applications.
We create a multilingual dataset for bias analysis and propose several ways for quantifying bias in multilingual representations.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-05-02T04:34:37Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.