Gender Inequality in English Textbooks Around the World: an NLP Approach

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2506.02425v1
• Date: Tue, 03 Jun 2025 04:16:09 GMT
• Title: Gender Inequality in English Textbooks Around the World: an NLP Approach
• Authors: Tairan Liu,
• Abstract summary: This study applies natural language processing methods to quantify gender inequality in English textbooks from 22 countries across 7 cultural spheres.<n> Metrics include character count, firstness (which gender is mentioned first), and TF-IDF word associations by gender.<n>Results show consistent overrepresentation of male characters in terms of count, firstness, and named entities.
• Score: 0.0
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Textbooks play a critical role in shaping children's understanding of the world. While previous studies have identified gender inequality in individual countries' textbooks, few have examined the issue cross-culturally. This study applies natural language processing methods to quantify gender inequality in English textbooks from 22 countries across 7 cultural spheres. Metrics include character count, firstness (which gender is mentioned first), and TF-IDF word associations by gender. The analysis also identifies gender patterns in proper names appearing in TF-IDF word lists, tests whether large language models can distinguish between gendered word lists, and uses GloVe embeddings to examine how closely keywords associate with each gender. Results show consistent overrepresentation of male characters in terms of count, firstness, and named entities. All regions exhibit gender inequality, with the Latin cultural sphere showing the least disparity.

Related papers

• Relating Word Embedding Gender Biases to Gender Gaps: A Cross-Cultural Analysis [6.057865461877989]
  This paper presents an approach for quantifying gender bias in word embeddings.<n>We then use these metrics to characterize statistical gender gaps in education, politics, economics, and health.<n>We validate these metrics on 2018 Twitter data spanning 51 U.S. regions and 99 countries.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-01-23T22:18:36Z)
• Gender Trouble in Language Models: An Empirical Audit Guided by Gender Performativity Theory [0.19116784879310028]
  Language models encode and perpetuate harmful gendered stereotypes.<n>Gendered terms that do not neatly fall into one of these binary categories are erased and pathologized.<n>Our findings lead us to call for a re-evaluation of how gendered harms in language models are defined and addressed.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-05-20T08:36:47Z)
• Beyond Binary Gender: Evaluating Gender-Inclusive Machine Translation with Ambiguous Attitude Words [85.48043537327258]
  Existing machine translation gender bias evaluations are primarily focused on male and female genders. This study presents a benchmark AmbGIMT (Gender-Inclusive Machine Translation with Ambiguous attitude words) We propose a novel process to evaluate gender bias based on the Emotional Attitude Score (EAS), which is used to quantify ambiguous attitude words.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-07-23T08:13:51Z)
• What an Elegant Bridge: Multilingual LLMs are Biased Similarly in Different Languages [51.0349882045866]
  This paper investigates biases of Large Language Models (LLMs) through the lens of grammatical gender. We prompt a model to describe nouns with adjectives in various languages, focusing specifically on languages with grammatical gender. We find that a simple classifier can not only predict noun gender above chance but also exhibit cross-language transferability.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-07-12T22:10:16Z)
• Leveraging Large Language Models to Measure Gender Representation Bias in Gendered Language Corpora [9.959039325564744]
  Gender bias in text corpora can lead to perpetuation and amplification of societal inequalities. Existing methods to measure gender representation bias in text corpora have mainly been proposed for English. This paper introduces a novel methodology to quantitatively measure gender representation bias in Spanish corpora.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-19T16:30:58Z)
• VisoGender: A dataset for benchmarking gender bias in image-text pronoun resolution [80.57383975987676]
  VisoGender is a novel dataset for benchmarking gender bias in vision-language models. We focus on occupation-related biases within a hegemonic system of binary gender, inspired by Winograd and Winogender schemas. We benchmark several state-of-the-art vision-language models and find that they demonstrate bias in resolving binary gender in complex scenes.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-06-21T17:59:51Z)
• Measuring Gender Bias in Word Embeddings of Gendered Languages Requires Disentangling Grammatical Gender Signals [3.0349733976070015]
  We demonstrate that word embeddings learn the association between a noun and its grammatical gender in grammatically gendered languages. We show that disentangling grammatical gender signals from word embeddings may lead to improvement in semantic machine learning tasks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-06-03T17:11:00Z)
• Gender Bias Hidden Behind Chinese Word Embeddings: The Case of Chinese Adjectives [0.0]
  This paper investigates gender bias in static word embeddings from a unique perspective, Chinese adjectives. Through a comparison between the produced results and a human-scored data set, we demonstrate how gender bias encoded in word embeddings differentiates from people's attitudes.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-06-01T02:12:45Z)
• Quantifying Gender Bias Towards Politicians in Cross-Lingual Language Models [104.41668491794974]
  We quantify the usage of adjectives and verbs generated by language models surrounding the names of politicians as a function of their gender. We find that while some words such as dead, and designated are associated with both male and female politicians, a few specific words such as beautiful and divorced are predominantly associated with female politicians.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-04-15T15:03:26Z)
• They, Them, Theirs: Rewriting with Gender-Neutral English [56.14842450974887]
  We perform a case study on the singular they, a common way to promote gender inclusion in English. We show how a model can be trained to produce gender-neutral English with 1% word error rate with no human-labeled data.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-02-12T21:47:48Z)
• Multi-Dimensional Gender Bias Classification [67.65551687580552]
  Machine learning models can inadvertently learn socially undesirable patterns when training on gender biased text. We propose a general framework that decomposes gender bias in text along several pragmatic and semantic dimensions. Using this fine-grained framework, we automatically annotate eight large scale datasets with gender information.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-05-01T21:23:20Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.