News Consumption in Time of Conflict: 2021 Palestinian-Israel War as an
Example
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2109.12844v1
- Date: Mon, 27 Sep 2021 07:39:04 GMT
- Title: News Consumption in Time of Conflict: 2021 Palestinian-Israel War as an
Example
- Authors: Kareem Darwish
- Abstract summary: We conduct a detailed analysis of the news consumption of more than eight thousand Twitter users who are either pro-Palestinian or pro-Israeli.
We identify the stance of users using unsupervised stance detection.
We observe that users may consume more topically-related content from foreign and less popular sources.
- Score: 4.106987095869419
- License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
- Abstract: This paper examines news consumption in response to a major polarizing event,
and we use the May 2021 Israeli-Palestinian conflict as an example. We conduct
a detailed analysis of the news consumption of more than eight thousand Twitter
users who are either pro-Palestinian or pro-Israeli and authored more than 29
million tweets between January 1 and August 17, 2021. We identified the stance
of users using unsupervised stance detection. We observe that users may consume
more topically-related content from foreign and less popular sources, because,
unlike popular sources, they may reaffirm their views, offer more extreme,
hyper-partisan, or sensational content, or provide more in depth coverage of
the event. The sudden popularity of such sources may not translate to
longer-term or general popularity on other topics.
Related papers
- Hate Speech and Sentiment of YouTube Video Comments From Public and Private Sources Covering the Israel-Palestine Conflict [3.738325076054202]
This study explores the prevalence of hate speech (HS) and sentiment in YouTube video comments concerning the Israel-Palestine conflict.
Machine learning (ML) models were applied to the extracted comment sections of YouTube videos from public and private sources.
Sentiment analysis revealed a predominantly neutral stance in both source types, with more pronounced sentiments towards Israel and Palestine observed in public sources.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-03-03T09:03:14Z) - Israel-Hamas war through Telegram, Reddit and Twitter [9.020777839880571]
The study will cover an analysis of the related discussion in relation to different participants of the conflict and sentiment represented in those discussion.
We apply a volume analysis across the three datasets, entity extraction and then proceed to BERT topic analysis.
Our findings hint at polarized narratives as the hallmark of how political factions and outsiders mold public opinion.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-01-30T08:20:26Z) - Incentivizing News Consumption on Social Media Platforms Using Large Language Models and Realistic Bot Accounts [4.06613683722116]
This project examines how to enhance users' exposure to and engagement with verified and ideologically balanced news on Twitter.
We created 28 bots that replied to users tweeting about sports, entertainment, or lifestyle with a contextual reply.
To test differential effects by gender of the bots, treated users were randomly assigned to receive responses by bots presented as female or male.
We find that the treated users followed more news accounts and the users in the female bot treatment were more likely to like news content than the control.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-03-20T07:44:06Z) - News and Misinformation Consumption in Europe: A Longitudinal
Cross-Country Perspective [49.1574468325115]
This study investigated information consumption in four European countries.
It analyzed three years of Twitter activity from news outlet accounts in France, Germany, Italy, and the UK.
Results indicate that reliable sources dominate the information landscape, although unreliable content is still present across all countries.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-11-09T16:22:10Z) - Unveiling the Hidden Agenda: Biases in News Reporting and Consumption [59.55900146668931]
We build a six-year dataset on the Italian vaccine debate and adopt a Bayesian latent space model to identify narrative and selection biases.
We found a nonlinear relationship between biases and engagement, with higher engagement for extreme positions.
Analysis of news consumption on Twitter reveals common audiences among news outlets with similar ideological positions.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-01-14T18:58:42Z) - Twitter Dataset on the Russo-Ukrainian War [68.713984286035]
We have initiated an ongoing dataset acquisition from Twitter API.
The dataset has reached the amount of 57.3 million tweets, originating from 7.7 million users.
We apply an initial volume and sentiment analysis, while the dataset can be used to further exploratory investigation towards topic analysis, hate speech, propaganda recognition, or even show potential malicious entities like botnets.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-04-07T12:33:06Z) - Tweets in Time of Conflict: A Public Dataset Tracking the Twitter
Discourse on the War Between Ukraine and Russia [14.000779544058144]
On February 24, 2022, Russia invaded Ukraine. In the days that followed, reports kept flooding in from layman to news anchors of a conflict quickly escalating into war.
Russia faced immediate backlash and condemnation from the world at large.
While the war continues to contribute to an ongoing humanitarian and refugee crisis in Ukraine, a second battlefield has emerged in the online space.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-03-14T20:52:02Z) - FakeNewsLab: Experimental Study on Biases and Pitfalls Preventing us
from Distinguishing True from False News [0.2741266294612776]
This work highlights a series of pitfalls that can influence human annotators when building false news datasets.
It also challenges the common rationale of AI that suggest users to read the full article before re-sharing.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-10-22T12:02:16Z) - Reliability of Content and Echo Chambers on YouTube during the COVID-19
Debate [0.0]
This paper aims to investigate information diffusion during the COVID-19 pandemic by evaluating news consumption on YouTube.
We analyse more than 2 million users' engagement with 13,000 videos released by 68 YouTube channels labelled with a political bias and fact-checking index.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-06-16T10:44:29Z) - News consumption and social media regulations policy [70.31753171707005]
We analyze two social media that enforced opposite moderation methods, Twitter and Gab, to assess the interplay between news consumption and content regulation.
Our results show that the presence of moderation pursued by Twitter produces a significant reduction of questionable content.
The lack of clear regulation on Gab results in the tendency of the user to engage with both types of content, showing a slight preference for the questionable ones which may account for a dissing/endorsement behavior.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-06-07T19:26:32Z) - Viable Threat on News Reading: Generating Biased News Using Natural
Language Models [49.90665530780664]
We show that publicly available language models can reliably generate biased news content based on an input original news.
We also show that a large number of high-quality biased news articles can be generated using controllable text generation.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-10-05T16:55:39Z) - Can We Spot the "Fake News" Before It Was Even Written? [25.536546272915427]
A number of fact-checking initiatives have been launched so far, both manual and automatic.
An arguably more promising direction is to focus on fact-checking entire news outlets, which can be done in advance.
We describe how we do this in the Tanbih news aggregator, which makes readers aware of what they are reading.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-08-10T19:21:06Z) - HoaxItaly: a collection of Italian disinformation and fact-checking
stories shared on Twitter in 2019 [72.96986027203377]
The dataset includes also title and body for approximately 37k news articles.
It is publicly available at https://doi.org/10.79DVN/ PGVDHX.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-01-29T16:14:47Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.