Algorithm Fairness in AI for Medicine and Healthcare

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2110.00603v1
• Date: Fri, 1 Oct 2021 18:18:13 GMT
• Title: Algorithm Fairness in AI for Medicine and Healthcare
• Authors: Richard J. Chen, Tiffany Y. Chen, Jana Lipkova, Judy J. Wang, Drew F.K. Williamson, Ming Y. Lu, Sharifa Sahai, and Faisal Mahmood
• Abstract summary: algorithm fairness is a challenging problem in delivering equitable care. Recent evaluation of AI models stratified across race sub-populations have revealed enormous inequalities in how patients are diagnosed, given treatments, and billed for healthcare costs.
• Score: 4.626801344708786
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: In the current development and deployment of many artificial intelligence (AI) systems in healthcare, algorithm fairness is a challenging problem in delivering equitable care. Recent evaluation of AI models stratified across race sub-populations have revealed enormous inequalities in how patients are diagnosed, given treatments, and billed for healthcare costs. In this perspective article, we summarize the intersectional field of fairness in machine learning through the context of current issues in healthcare, outline how algorithmic biases (e.g. - image acquisition, genetic variation, intra-observer labeling variability) arise in current clinical workflows and their resulting healthcare disparities. Lastly, we also review emerging strategies for mitigating bias via decentralized learning, disentanglement, and model explainability.

Related papers

• AI-Driven Healthcare: A Survey on Ensuring Fairness and Mitigating Bias [2.398440840890111]
  AI applications have significantly improved diagnostic accuracy, treatment personalization, and patient outcome predictions. These advancements also introduce substantial ethical and fairness challenges. These biases can lead to disparities in healthcare delivery, affecting diagnostic accuracy and treatment outcomes across different demographic groups.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-07-29T02:39:17Z)
• Towards Clinical AI Fairness: Filling Gaps in the Puzzle [15.543248260582217]
  This review systematically pinpoints several deficiencies concerning both healthcare data and the provided AI fairness solutions. We highlight the scarcity of research on AI fairness in many medical domains where AI technology is increasingly utilized. To bridge these gaps, our review advances actionable strategies for both the healthcare and AI research communities.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-05-28T07:42:55Z)
• A Survey of Artificial Intelligence in Gait-Based Neurodegenerative Disease Diagnosis [51.07114445705692]
  neurodegenerative diseases (NDs) traditionally require extensive healthcare resources and human effort for medical diagnosis and monitoring. As a crucial disease-related motor symptom, human gait can be exploited to characterize different NDs. The current advances in artificial intelligence (AI) models enable automatic gait analysis for NDs identification and classification.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-05-21T06:44:40Z)
• Validating polyp and instrument segmentation methods in colonoscopy through Medico 2020 and MedAI 2021 Challenges [58.32937972322058]
  "Medico automatic polyp segmentation (Medico 2020)" and "MedAI: Transparency in Medical Image (MedAI 2021)" competitions. We present a comprehensive summary and analyze each contribution, highlight the strength of the best-performing methods, and discuss the possibility of clinical translations of such methods into the clinic.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-07-30T16:08:45Z)
• Towards clinical AI fairness: A translational perspective [13.061383127966872]
  We discuss the misalignment between technical and clinical perspectives of AI fairness. We advocate multidisciplinary collaboration to bridge the knowledge gap, and provide possible solutions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-04-26T12:38:40Z)
• Human-Centric Multimodal Machine Learning: Recent Advances and Testbed on AI-based Recruitment [66.91538273487379]
  There is a certain consensus about the need to develop AI applications with a Human-Centric approach. Human-Centric Machine Learning needs to be developed based on four main requirements: (i) utility and social good; (ii) privacy and data ownership; (iii) transparency and accountability; and (iv) fairness in AI-driven decision-making processes. We study how current multimodal algorithms based on heterogeneous sources of information are affected by sensitive elements and inner biases in the data.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-02-13T16:44:44Z)
• Detecting Shortcut Learning for Fair Medical AI using Shortcut Testing [62.9062883851246]
  Machine learning holds great promise for improving healthcare, but it is critical to ensure that its use will not propagate or amplify health disparities. One potential driver of algorithmic unfairness, shortcut learning, arises when ML models base predictions on improper correlations in the training data. Using multi-task learning, we propose the first method to assess and mitigate shortcut learning as a part of the fairness assessment of clinical ML systems.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-07-21T09:35:38Z)
• Fair Machine Learning in Healthcare: A Review [90.22219142430146]
  We analyze the intersection of fairness in machine learning and healthcare disparities. We provide a critical review of the associated fairness metrics from a machine learning standpoint. We propose several new research directions that hold promise for developing ethical and equitable ML applications in healthcare.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-06-29T04:32:10Z)
• The Medkit-Learn(ing) Environment: Medical Decision Modelling through Simulation [81.72197368690031]
  We present a new benchmarking suite designed specifically for medical sequential decision making. The Medkit-Learn(ing) Environment is a publicly available Python package providing simple and easy access to high-fidelity synthetic medical data.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-06-08T10:38:09Z)
• Assessing Fairness in Classification Parity of Machine Learning Models in Healthcare [19.33981403623531]
  We present preliminary results on fairness in the context of classification parity in healthcare. We also present some exploratory methods to improve fairness and choosing appropriate classification algorithms in the context of healthcare.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-02-07T04:46:27Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.