AI-Driven Healthcare: A Survey on Ensuring Fairness and Mitigating Bias
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2407.19655v1
- Date: Mon, 29 Jul 2024 02:39:17 GMT
- Title: AI-Driven Healthcare: A Survey on Ensuring Fairness and Mitigating Bias
- Authors: Sribala Vidyadhari Chinta, Zichong Wang, Xingyu Zhang, Thang Doan Viet, Ayesha Kashif, Monique Antoinette Smith, Wenbin Zhang,
- Abstract summary: AI applications have significantly improved diagnostic accuracy, treatment personalization, and patient outcome predictions.
These advancements also introduce substantial ethical and fairness challenges.
These biases can lead to disparities in healthcare delivery, affecting diagnostic accuracy and treatment outcomes across different demographic groups.
- Score: 2.398440840890111
- License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
- Abstract: Artificial intelligence (AI) is rapidly advancing in healthcare, enhancing the efficiency and effectiveness of services across various specialties, including cardiology, ophthalmology, dermatology, emergency medicine, etc. AI applications have significantly improved diagnostic accuracy, treatment personalization, and patient outcome predictions by leveraging technologies such as machine learning, neural networks, and natural language processing. However, these advancements also introduce substantial ethical and fairness challenges, particularly related to biases in data and algorithms. These biases can lead to disparities in healthcare delivery, affecting diagnostic accuracy and treatment outcomes across different demographic groups. This survey paper examines the integration of AI in healthcare, highlighting critical challenges related to bias and exploring strategies for mitigation. We emphasize the necessity of diverse datasets, fairness-aware algorithms, and regulatory frameworks to ensure equitable healthcare delivery. The paper concludes with recommendations for future research, advocating for interdisciplinary approaches, transparency in AI decision-making, and the development of innovative and inclusive AI applications.
Related papers
- Towards Privacy-aware Mental Health AI Models: Advances, Challenges, and Opportunities [61.633126163190724]
Mental illness is a widespread and debilitating condition with substantial societal and personal costs.
Recent advances in Artificial Intelligence (AI) hold great potential for recognizing and addressing conditions such as depression, anxiety disorder, bipolar disorder, schizophrenia, and post-traumatic stress disorder.
Privacy concerns, including the risk of sensitive data leakage from datasets and trained models, remain a critical barrier to deploying these AI systems in real-world clinical settings.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-02-01T15:10:02Z) - Ethical Challenges and Evolving Strategies in the Integration of Artificial Intelligence into Clinical Practice [1.0301404234578682]
We focus on five critical ethical concerns: justice and fairness, transparency, patient consent and confidentiality, accountability, and patient-centered and equitable care.
The paper explores how bias, lack of transparency, and challenges in maintaining patient trust can undermine the effectiveness and fairness of AI applications in healthcare.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-11-18T00:52:22Z) - Towards Clinical AI Fairness: Filling Gaps in the Puzzle [15.543248260582217]
This review systematically pinpoints several deficiencies concerning both healthcare data and the provided AI fairness solutions.
We highlight the scarcity of research on AI fairness in many medical domains where AI technology is increasingly utilized.
To bridge these gaps, our review advances actionable strategies for both the healthcare and AI research communities.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-05-28T07:42:55Z) - Emotional Intelligence Through Artificial Intelligence : NLP and Deep Learning in the Analysis of Healthcare Texts [1.9374282535132377]
This manuscript presents a methodical examination of the utilization of Artificial Intelligence in the assessment of emotions in texts related to healthcare.
We scrutinize numerous research studies that employ AI to augment sentiment analysis, categorize emotions, and forecast patient outcomes.
There persist challenges, which encompass ensuring the ethical application of AI, safeguarding patient confidentiality, and addressing potential biases in algorithmic procedures.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-03-14T15:58:13Z) - Validating polyp and instrument segmentation methods in colonoscopy through Medico 2020 and MedAI 2021 Challenges [58.32937972322058]
"Medico automatic polyp segmentation (Medico 2020)" and "MedAI: Transparency in Medical Image (MedAI 2021)" competitions.
We present a comprehensive summary and analyze each contribution, highlight the strength of the best-performing methods, and discuss the possibility of clinical translations of such methods into the clinic.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-07-30T16:08:45Z) - A Conceptual Algorithm for Applying Ethical Principles of AI to Medical Practice [5.005928809654619]
AI-powered tools are increasingly matching or exceeding specialist-level performance across multiple domains.
These systems promise to reduce disparities in care delivery across demographic, racial, and socioeconomic boundaries.
The democratization of such AI tools can reduce the cost of care, optimize resource allocation, and improve the quality of care.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-04-23T04:14:18Z) - Human-Centric Multimodal Machine Learning: Recent Advances and Testbed
on AI-based Recruitment [66.91538273487379]
There is a certain consensus about the need to develop AI applications with a Human-Centric approach.
Human-Centric Machine Learning needs to be developed based on four main requirements: (i) utility and social good; (ii) privacy and data ownership; (iii) transparency and accountability; and (iv) fairness in AI-driven decision-making processes.
We study how current multimodal algorithms based on heterogeneous sources of information are affected by sensitive elements and inner biases in the data.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-02-13T16:44:44Z) - The Role of AI in Drug Discovery: Challenges, Opportunities, and
Strategies [97.5153823429076]
The benefits, challenges and drawbacks of AI in this field are reviewed.
The use of data augmentation, explainable AI, and the integration of AI with traditional experimental methods are also discussed.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-12-08T23:23:39Z) - Robust and Efficient Medical Imaging with Self-Supervision [80.62711706785834]
We present REMEDIS, a unified representation learning strategy to improve robustness and data-efficiency of medical imaging AI.
We study a diverse range of medical imaging tasks and simulate three realistic application scenarios using retrospective data.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-05-19T17:34:18Z) - Algorithm Fairness in AI for Medicine and Healthcare [4.626801344708786]
algorithm fairness is a challenging problem in delivering equitable care.
Recent evaluation of AI models stratified across race sub-populations have revealed enormous inequalities in how patients are diagnosed, given treatments, and billed for healthcare costs.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-10-01T18:18:13Z) - The Medkit-Learn(ing) Environment: Medical Decision Modelling through
Simulation [81.72197368690031]
We present a new benchmarking suite designed specifically for medical sequential decision making.
The Medkit-Learn(ing) Environment is a publicly available Python package providing simple and easy access to high-fidelity synthetic medical data.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-06-08T10:38:09Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.