Information-Theoretic Generalization Bounds for Iterative Semi-Supervised Learning

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2110.00926v1
• Date: Sun, 3 Oct 2021 05:38:49 GMT
• Title: Information-Theoretic Generalization Bounds for Iterative Semi-Supervised Learning
• Authors: Haiyun He, Hanshu Yan, Vincent Y. F. Tan
• Abstract summary: In particular, we seek to understand the behaviour of the em generalization error of iterative SSL algorithms using information-theoretic principles. Our theoretical results suggest that when the class conditional variances are not too large, the upper bound on the generalization error decreases monotonically with the number of iterations, but quickly saturates.
• Score: 81.1071978288003
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: We consider iterative semi-supervised learning (SSL) algorithms that iteratively generate pseudo-labels for a large amount unlabelled data to progressively refine the model parameters. In particular, we seek to understand the behaviour of the {\em generalization error} of iterative SSL algorithms using information-theoretic principles. To obtain bounds that are amenable to numerical evaluation, we first work with a simple model -- namely, the binary Gaussian mixture model. Our theoretical results suggest that when the class conditional variances are not too large, the upper bound on the generalization error decreases monotonically with the number of iterations, but quickly saturates. The theoretical results on the simple model are corroborated by extensive experiments on several benchmark datasets such as the MNIST and CIFAR datasets in which we notice that the generalization error improves after several pseudo-labelling iterations, but saturates afterwards.

Related papers

• Learning a Gaussian Mixture for Sparsity Regularization in Inverse Problems [2.375943263571389]
  In inverse problems, the incorporation of a sparsity prior yields a regularization effect on the solution. We propose a probabilistic sparsity prior formulated as a mixture of Gaussians, capable of modeling sparsity with respect to a generic basis. We put forth both a supervised and an unsupervised training strategy to estimate the parameters of this network.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-01-29T22:52:57Z)
• MaxMatch: Semi-Supervised Learning with Worst-Case Consistency [149.03760479533855]
  We propose a worst-case consistency regularization technique for semi-supervised learning (SSL) We present a generalization bound for SSL consisting of the empirical loss terms observed on labeled and unlabeled training data separately. Motivated by this bound, we derive an SSL objective that minimizes the largest inconsistency between an original unlabeled sample and its multiple augmented variants.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-09-26T12:04:49Z)
• Generalization of Neural Combinatorial Solvers Through the Lens of Adversarial Robustness [68.97830259849086]
  Most datasets only capture a simpler subproblem and likely suffer from spurious features. We study adversarial robustness - a local generalization property - to reveal hard, model-specific instances and spurious features. Unlike in other applications, where perturbation models are designed around subjective notions of imperceptibility, our perturbation models are efficient and sound. Surprisingly, with such perturbations, a sufficiently expressive neural solver does not suffer from the limitations of the accuracy-robustness trade-off common in supervised learning.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-10-21T07:28:11Z)
• Sharp global convergence guarantees for iterative nonconvex optimization: A Gaussian process perspective [30.524043513721168]
  We develop a general recipe for analyzing the convergence of iterative algorithms for a class of regression models. deterministicly, we accurately capture both the convergence rate of the algorithm and the eventual error floor in the finite-sample regime. We show sharp convergence rates for both higher-order algorithms based on alternating updates and first-order algorithms based on subgradient subgradients.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-09-20T21:48:19Z)
• Detecting Label Noise via Leave-One-Out Cross Validation [0.0]
  We present a simple algorithm for identifying and correcting real-valued noisy labels from a mixture of clean and corrupted samples. A heteroscedastic noise model is employed, in which additive Gaussian noise terms with independent variances are associated with each and all of the observed labels. We show that the presented method can pinpoint corrupted samples and lead to better regression models when trained on synthetic and real-world scientific data sets.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-03-21T10:02:50Z)
• The Predictive Normalized Maximum Likelihood for Over-parameterized Linear Regression with Norm Constraint: Regret and Double Descent [12.929639356256928]
  We show that modern machine learning models do not obey a trade-off between the complexity of a prediction rule and its ability to generalize. We use the recently proposed predictive normalized maximum likelihood (pNML) which is the min-max regret solution for individual data. We demonstrate the use of the pNML regret as a point-wise learnability measure on synthetic data and that it can successfully predict the double-decent phenomenon.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-02-14T15:49:04Z)
• Understanding Double Descent Requires a Fine-Grained Bias-Variance Decomposition [34.235007566913396]
  We describe an interpretable, symmetric decomposition of the variance into terms associated with the labels. We find that the bias decreases monotonically with the network width, but the variance terms exhibit non-monotonic behavior. We also analyze the strikingly rich phenomenology that arises.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-11-04T21:04:02Z)
• CASTLE: Regularization via Auxiliary Causal Graph Discovery [89.74800176981842]
  We introduce Causal Structure Learning (CASTLE) regularization and propose to regularize a neural network by jointly learning the causal relationships between variables. CASTLE efficiently reconstructs only the features in the causal DAG that have a causal neighbor, whereas reconstruction-based regularizers suboptimally reconstruct all input features.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-09-28T09:49:38Z)
• Semi-Supervised Learning with Meta-Gradient [123.26748223837802]
  We propose a simple yet effective meta-learning algorithm in semi-supervised learning. We find that the proposed algorithm performs favorably against state-of-the-art methods.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-07-08T08:48:56Z)
• Good Classifiers are Abundant in the Interpolating Regime [64.72044662855612]
  We develop a methodology to compute precisely the full distribution of test errors among interpolating classifiers. We find that test errors tend to concentrate around a small typical value $varepsilon*$, which deviates substantially from the test error of worst-case interpolating model. Our results show that the usual style of analysis in statistical learning theory may not be fine-grained enough to capture the good generalization performance observed in practice.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-06-22T21:12:31Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.