Consistency Regularization Can Improve Robustness to Label Noise

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2110.01242v1
• Date: Mon, 4 Oct 2021 08:15:08 GMT
• Title: Consistency Regularization Can Improve Robustness to Label Noise
• Authors: Erik Englesson, Hossein Azizpour
• Abstract summary: This paper empirically studies the relevance of consistency regularization for training-time robustness to noisy labels. We show that a simple loss function that encourages consistency improves the robustness of the models to label noise.
• Score: 4.340338299803562
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: Consistency regularization is a commonly-used technique for semi-supervised and self-supervised learning. It is an auxiliary objective function that encourages the prediction of the network to be similar in the vicinity of the observed training samples. Hendrycks et al. (2020) have recently shown such regularization naturally brings test-time robustness to corrupted data and helps with calibration. This paper empirically studies the relevance of consistency regularization for training-time robustness to noisy labels. First, we make two interesting and useful observations regarding the consistency of networks trained with the standard cross entropy loss on noisy datasets which are: (i) networks trained on noisy data have lower consistency than those trained on clean data, and(ii) the consistency reduces more significantly around noisy-labelled training data points than correctly-labelled ones. Then, we show that a simple loss function that encourages consistency improves the robustness of the models to label noise on both synthetic (CIFAR-10, CIFAR-100) and real-world (WebVision) noise as well as different noise rates and types and achieves state-of-the-art results.

Related papers

• Mitigating Noisy Supervision Using Synthetic Samples with Soft Labels [13.314778587751588]
  Noisy labels are ubiquitous in real-world datasets, especially in the large-scale ones derived from crowdsourcing and web searching. It is challenging to train deep neural networks with noisy datasets since the networks are prone to overfitting the noisy labels during training. We propose a framework that trains the model with new synthetic samples to mitigate the impact of noisy labels.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-22T04:49:39Z)
• Noisy Correspondence Learning with Self-Reinforcing Errors Mitigation [63.180725016463974]
  Cross-modal retrieval relies on well-matched large-scale datasets that are laborious in practice. We introduce a novel noisy correspondence learning framework, namely textbfSelf-textbfReinforcing textbfErrors textbfMitigation (SREM)
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-12-27T09:03:43Z)
• Dynamic Loss For Robust Learning [17.33444812274523]
  This work presents a novel meta-learning based dynamic loss that automatically adjusts the objective functions with the training process to robustly learn a classifier from long-tailed noisy data. Our method achieves state-of-the-art accuracy on multiple real-world and synthetic datasets with various types of data biases, including CIFAR-10/100, Animal-10N, ImageNet-LT, and Webvision.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-11-22T01:48:25Z)
• Neighborhood Collective Estimation for Noisy Label Identification and Correction [92.20697827784426]
  Learning with noisy labels (LNL) aims at designing strategies to improve model performance and generalization by mitigating the effects of model overfitting to noisy labels. Recent advances employ the predicted label distributions of individual samples to perform noise verification and noisy label correction, easily giving rise to confirmation bias. We propose Neighborhood Collective Estimation, in which the predictive reliability of a candidate sample is re-estimated by contrasting it against its feature-space nearest neighbors.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-08-05T14:47:22Z)
• Robust Training under Label Noise by Over-parameterization [41.03008228953627]
  We propose a principled approach for robust training of over-parameterized deep networks in classification tasks where a proportion of training labels are corrupted. The main idea is yet very simple: label noise is sparse and incoherent with the network learned from clean data, so we model the noise and learn to separate it from the data. Remarkably, when trained using such a simple method in practice, we demonstrate state-of-the-art test accuracy against label noise on a variety of real datasets.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-02-28T18:50:10Z)
• Synergistic Network Learning and Label Correction for Noise-robust Image Classification [28.27739181560233]
  Deep Neural Networks (DNNs) tend to overfit training label noise, resulting in poorer model performance in practice. We propose a robust label correction framework combining the ideas of small loss selection and noise correction. We demonstrate our method on both synthetic and real-world datasets with different noise types and rates.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-02-27T23:06:31Z)
• Learning with Neighbor Consistency for Noisy Labels [69.83857578836769]
  We present a method for learning from noisy labels that leverages similarities between training examples in feature space. We evaluate our method on datasets evaluating both synthetic (CIFAR-10, CIFAR-100) and realistic (mini-WebVision, Clothing1M, mini-ImageNet-Red) noise.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-02-04T15:46:27Z)
• S3: Supervised Self-supervised Learning under Label Noise [53.02249460567745]
  In this paper we address the problem of classification in the presence of label noise. In the heart of our method is a sample selection mechanism that relies on the consistency between the annotated label of a sample and the distribution of the labels in its neighborhood in the feature space. Our method significantly surpasses previous methods on both CIFARCIFAR100 with artificial noise and real-world noisy datasets such as WebVision and ANIMAL-10N.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-11-22T15:49:20Z)
• Learning with Noisy Labels Revisited: A Study Using Real-World Human Annotations [54.400167806154535]
  Existing research on learning with noisy labels mainly focuses on synthetic label noise. This work presents two new benchmark datasets (CIFAR-10N, CIFAR-100N) We show that real-world noisy labels follow an instance-dependent pattern rather than the classically adopted class-dependent ones.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-10-22T22:42:11Z)
• Affect Expression Behaviour Analysis in the Wild using Consensual Collaborative Training [2.538209532048867]
  This report presents Consensual Collaborative Training (CCT) framework used in our submission to the Affective Behaviour Analysis in-the-wild (ABAW) 2021 competition. CCT co-trains three networks jointly using a convex combination of supervision loss and consistency loss. Co-training reduces overall error, and consistency loss prevents overfitting to noisy samples.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-07-08T04:28:21Z)
• Semi-supervised Long-tailed Recognition using Alternate Sampling [95.93760490301395]
  Main challenges in long-tailed recognition come from the imbalanced data distribution and sample scarcity in its tail classes. We propose a new recognition setting, namely semi-supervised long-tailed recognition. We demonstrate significant accuracy improvements over other competitive methods on two datasets.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-05-01T00:43:38Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.