Digital Divide and Social Dilemma of Privacy Preservation

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2110.02669v1
• Date: Wed, 6 Oct 2021 11:43:46 GMT
• Title: Digital Divide and Social Dilemma of Privacy Preservation
• Authors: Hamoud Alhazmi, Ahmed Imran, Mohammad Abu Alsheikh
• Abstract summary: "Digital privacy divide (DPD)" is introduced to describe the perceived gap in the privacy preservation of individuals based on the geopolitical location of different countries. We created an online questionnaire and collected answers from more than 700 respondents from four different countries. Individuals residing in Germany and Bangladesh share similar privacy concerns, while there is a significant similarity among individuals residing in the United States and India.
• Score: 0.6261444979025642
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: While digital divide studies primarily focused on access to information and communications technology (ICT) in the past, its influence on other associated dimensions such as privacy is becoming critical with a far-reaching impact on the people and society. For example, the various levels of government legislation and compliance on information privacy worldwide have created a new era of digital divide in the privacy preservation domain. In this article, the concept "digital privacy divide (DPD)" is introduced to describe the perceived gap in the privacy preservation of individuals based on the geopolitical location of different countries. To better understand the DPD phenomenon, we created an online questionnaire and collected answers from more than 700 respondents from four different countries (the United States, Germany, Bangladesh, and India) who come from two distinct cultural orientations as per Hofstede's individualist vs. collectivist society. However, our results revealed some interesting findings. DPD does not depend on Hofstede's cultural orientation of the countries. For example, individuals residing in Germany and Bangladesh share similar privacy concerns, while there is a significant similarity among individuals residing in the United States and India. Moreover, while most respondents acknowledge the importance of privacy legislation to protect their digital privacy, they do not mind their governments to allow domestic companies and organizations collecting personal data on individuals residing outside their countries, if there are economic, employment, and crime prevention benefits. These results suggest a social dilemma in the perceived privacy preservation, which could be dependent on many other contextual factors beyond government legislation and countries' cultural orientation.

Related papers

• Perception of Digital Privacy Protection: An Empirical Study using GDPR Framework [0.22628031081632272]
  This study investigates people perception of digital privacy protection of government data using the General Data Protection Perception Regulation ( systems dichotomy) framework. Findings suggest a dichotomy in perception in protecting people privacy rights. The right to object by granting and with-drawing consent is perceived as the least protected. Second, the study shows evidence of a social dilemma in people perception of digital privacy based on their context and culture.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-11-19T04:36:31Z)
• Position: Challenges and Opportunities for Differential Privacy in the U.S. Federal Government [34.255047514441195]
  We seek to elucidate challenges and opportunities for differential privacy within the federal government setting. We highlight three significant challenges which currently restrict the use of differential privacy in the U.S. government. We provide two examples where differential privacy can enhance the capabilities of government agencies.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-21T18:46:05Z)
• Evaluating the Effects of Digital Privacy Regulations on User Trust [0.0]
  The study investigates the impact of digital privacy laws on user trust by comparing regulations in the Netherlands, Ghana, and Malaysia. The main findings reveal that while the General Protection Regulation in the Netherlands is strict, its practical impact is limited by challenges enforcement. In Ghana, Data Protection Act is underutilized due to low public awareness and insufficient enforcement, leading to reliance on personal protective measures. In Malaysia, trust in digital services is largely dependent on the security practices of individual platforms rather than the Personal Data Protection Act.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-09-04T11:11:41Z)
• Cultural Differences in Students' Privacy Concerns in Learning Analytics across Germany, South Korea, Spain, Sweden, and the United States [47.11163387909141]
  Students' privacy concerns vary across national and cultural dimensions. German and Swedish students stood out as the most trusting and least concerned. Culture measured at the individual level affected the antecedents and outcomes of privacy concerns more than country-level culture.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-12-04T18:10:20Z)
• SoK: The Gap Between Data Rights Ideals and Reality [46.14715472341707]
  Do rights-based privacy laws effectively empower individuals over their data? This paper scrutinizes these approaches by reviewing empirical studies, news articles, and blog posts.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-12-03T21:52:51Z)
• Privacy and Fairness in Federated Learning: on the Perspective of Trade-off [58.204074436129716]
  Federated learning (FL) has been a hot topic in recent years. As two crucial ethical notions, the interactions between privacy and fairness are comparatively less studied.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-06-25T04:38:19Z)
• How Do Input Attributes Impact the Privacy Loss in Differential Privacy? [55.492422758737575]
  We study the connection between the per-subject norm in DP neural networks and individual privacy loss. We introduce a novel metric termed the Privacy Loss-Input Susceptibility (PLIS) which allows one to apportion the subject's privacy loss to their input attributes.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-11-18T11:39:03Z)
• Ctrl-Shift: How Privacy Sentiment Changed from 2019 to 2021 [14.600192799641077]
  We study the sentiments of people in the U.S. toward collection and use of data for government- and health-related purposes from 2019-2021. After the onset of COVID-19, we observe significant decreases in respondent acceptance of government data use. Following the 2020 U.S. national elections, we observe some of the first evidence that privacy sentiments may change based on the alignment between a user's politics and the political party in power.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-10-18T16:13:02Z)
• Decision Making with Differential Privacy under a Fairness Lens [65.16089054531395]
  The U.S. Census Bureau releases data sets and statistics about groups of individuals that are used as input to a number of critical decision processes. To conform to privacy and confidentiality requirements, these agencies are often required to release privacy-preserving versions of the data. This paper studies the release of differentially private data sets and analyzes their impact on some critical resource allocation tasks under a fairness perspective.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-05-16T21:04:19Z)
• The Kaleidoscope of Privacy: Differences across French, German, UK, and US GDPR Media Discourse [0.0]
  The European Union passed the General Data Protection Regulation on 25 May 2018. The research presented here draws on two years of media reporting on topics from French, German UK and US sources.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-03-31T12:46:23Z)
• A vision for global privacy bridges: Technical and legal measures for international data markets [77.34726150561087]
  Despite data protection laws and an acknowledged right to privacy, trading personal information has become a business equated with "trading oil" An open conflict is arising between business demands for data and a desire for privacy. We propose and test a vision of a personal information market with privacy.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-05-13T13:55:50Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.