Unique on Facebook: Formulation and Evidence of (Nano)targeting Individual Users with non-PII Data

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2110.06636v2
• Date: Sat, 16 Oct 2021 16:27:51 GMT
• Title: Unique on Facebook: Formulation and Evidence of (Nano)targeting Individual Users with non-PII Data
• Authors: Jos\'e Gonz\'alez-Caba\~nas, \'Angel Cuevas, Rub\'en Cuevas, Juan L\'opez-Fern\'andez, David Garc\'ia
• Abstract summary: We define a data-driven model to quantify the number of interests from a user that make them unique on Facebook. To the best of our knowledge, this represents the first study of individuals' uniqueness at the world population scale. We run an experiment through 21 Facebook ad campaigns that target three of the authors of this paper.
• Score: 0.10799106628248668
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
• Abstract: The privacy of an individual is bounded by the ability of a third party to reveal their identity. Certain data items such as a passport ID or a mobile phone number may be used to uniquely identify a person. These are referred to as Personal Identifiable Information (PII) items. Previous literature has also reported that, in datasets including millions of users, a combination of several non-PII items (which alone are not enough to identify an individual) can uniquely identify an individual within the dataset. In this paper, we define a data-driven model to quantify the number of interests from a user that make them unique on Facebook. To the best of our knowledge, this represents the first study of individuals' uniqueness at the world population scale. Besides, users' interests are actionable non-PII items that can be used to define ad campaigns and deliver tailored ads to Facebook users. We run an experiment through 21 Facebook ad campaigns that target three of the authors of this paper to prove that, if an advertiser knows enough interests from a user, the Facebook Advertising Platform can be systematically exploited to deliver ads exclusively to a specific user. We refer to this practice as nanotargeting. Finally, we discuss the harmful risks associated with nanotargeting such as psychological persuasion, user manipulation, or blackmailing, and provide easily implementable countermeasures to preclude attacks based on nanotargeting campaigns on Facebook.

Related papers

• On mission Twitter Profiles: A Study of Selective Toxic Behavior [5.0157204307764625]
  This study aims to characterize profiles potentially used for influence operations, termed 'on-mission profiles' Longitudinal data from 138K Twitter or X, profiles and 293M tweets enables profiling based on theme diversity.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-01-25T15:42:36Z)
• FedDMF: Privacy-Preserving User Attribute Prediction using Deep Matrix Factorization [1.9181612035055007]
  We propose a novel algorithm for predicting user attributes without requiring user matching. Our approach involves training deep matrix factorization models on different clients and sharing only attribute item vectors. This allows us to predict user attributes without sharing the user vectors themselves.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-12-24T06:49:00Z)
• Discrimination through Image Selection by Job Advertisers on Facebook [79.21648699199648]
  We propose and investigate the prevalence of a new means for discrimination in job advertising. It combines both targeting and delivery -- through the disproportionate representation or exclusion of people of certain demographics in job ad images. We use the Facebook Ad Library to demonstrate the prevalence of this practice.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-06-13T03:43:58Z)
• Protecting User Privacy in Online Settings via Supervised Learning [69.38374877559423]
  We design an intelligent approach to online privacy protection that leverages supervised learning. By detecting and blocking data collection that might infringe on a user's privacy, we can restore a degree of digital privacy to the user.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-04-06T05:20:16Z)
• How Do Input Attributes Impact the Privacy Loss in Differential Privacy? [55.492422758737575]
  We study the connection between the per-subject norm in DP neural networks and individual privacy loss. We introduce a novel metric termed the Privacy Loss-Input Susceptibility (PLIS) which allows one to apportion the subject's privacy loss to their input attributes.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-11-18T11:39:03Z)
• Subject Membership Inference Attacks in Federated Learning [4.377743737361996]
  We propose two black-box attacks for subject membership inference. We find our attacks to be extremely potent, even without access to exact training records. We also investigate the effectiveness of Differential Privacy in mitigating this threat.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-06-07T14:06:12Z)
• Behind the Mask: Demographic bias in name detection for PII masking [5.071136834627255]
  We evaluate the performance of three off-the-shelf PII masking systems on name detection and redaction. We find that an open-source RoBERTa-based system shows fewer disparities than the commercial models we test. The highest error rates occurred for names associated with Black and Asian/Pacific Islander individuals.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-05-09T18:21:41Z)
• Truth Serum: Poisoning Machine Learning Models to Reveal Their Secrets [53.866927712193416]
  We show that an adversary who can poison a training dataset can cause models trained on this dataset to leak private details belonging to other parties. Our attacks are effective across membership inference, attribute inference, and data extraction. Our results cast doubts on the relevance of cryptographic privacy guarantees in multiparty protocols for machine learning.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-03-31T18:06:28Z)
• Challenges and approaches to privacy preserving post-click conversion prediction [3.4071263815701336]
  We provide an overview of the challenges and constraints when learning conversion models in this setting. We introduce a novel approach for training these models that makes use of post-ranking signals. We show using offline experiments on real world data that it outperforms a model relying on opt-in data alone.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-01-29T21:36:01Z)
• InfoScrub: Towards Attribute Privacy by Targeted Obfuscation [77.49428268918703]
  We study techniques that allow individuals to limit the private information leaked in visual data. We tackle this problem in a novel image obfuscation framework. We find our approach generates obfuscated images faithful to the original input images, and additionally increase uncertainty by 6.2$times$ (or up to 0.85 bits) over the non-obfuscated counterparts.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-05-20T19:48:04Z)
• Keystroke Biometrics in Response to Fake News Propagation in a Global Pandemic [77.79066811371978]
  This work proposes and analyzes the use of keystroke biometrics for content de-anonymization. Fake news have become a powerful tool to manipulate public opinion, especially during major events.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-05-15T17:56:11Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.