Spatio-temporal extreme event modeling of terror insurgencies

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2110.08363v1
• Date: Fri, 15 Oct 2021 20:50:24 GMT
• Title: Spatio-temporal extreme event modeling of terror insurgencies
• Authors: Lekha Patel, Lyndsay Shand, J. Derek Tucker, Gabriel Huerta
• Abstract summary: This paper introduces a self-exciting model for attacks whose inhomogeneous intensity is written as a triggering function. By inferring the parameters of this model, we highlight specific space-time areas in which attacks are likely to occur. We show that our model is able to predict the intensity of future attacks for 2019-2021.
• Score: 0.7874708385247353
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Extreme events with potential deadly outcomes, such as those organized by terror groups, are highly unpredictable in nature and an imminent threat to society. In particular, quantifying the likelihood of a terror attack occurring in an arbitrary space-time region and its relative societal risk, would facilitate informed measures that would strengthen national security. This paper introduces a novel self-exciting marked spatio-temporal model for attacks whose inhomogeneous baseline intensity is written as a function of covariates. Its triggering intensity is succinctly modeled with a Gaussian Process prior distribution to flexibly capture intricate spatio-temporal dependencies between an arbitrary attack and previous terror events. By inferring the parameters of this model, we highlight specific space-time areas in which attacks are likely to occur. Furthermore, by measuring the outcome of an attack in terms of the number of casualties it produces, we introduce a novel mixture distribution for the number of casualties. This distribution flexibly handles low and high number of casualties and the discrete nature of the data through a {\it Generalized ZipF} distribution. We rely on a customized Markov chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) method to estimate the model parameters. We illustrate the methodology with data from the open source Global Terrorism Database (GTD) that correspond to attacks in Afghanistan from 2013-2018. We show that our model is able to predict the intensity of future attacks for 2019-2021 while considering various covariates of interest such as population density, number of regional languages spoken, and the density of population supporting the opposing government.

Related papers

• Metaheuristic approaches to the placement of suicide bomber detectors [0.0]
  Suicide bombing is an infamous form of terrorism that is becoming increasingly prevalent in the current era of global terror warfare. We consider the case of targeted attacks of this kind, and the use of detectors distributed over the area under threat as a protective countermeasure. To this end, different metaheuristic approaches based on local search and on population-based search are considered and benchmarked against a powerful greedy algorithm.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-05-28T21:14:01Z)
• FreqFed: A Frequency Analysis-Based Approach for Mitigating Poisoning Attacks in Federated Learning [98.43475653490219]
  Federated learning (FL) is susceptible to poisoning attacks. FreqFed is a novel aggregation mechanism that transforms the model updates into the frequency domain. We demonstrate that FreqFed can mitigate poisoning attacks effectively with a negligible impact on the utility of the aggregated model.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-12-07T16:56:24Z)
• Understanding the Vulnerability of Skeleton-based Human Activity Recognition via Black-box Attack [53.032801921915436]
  Human Activity Recognition (HAR) has been employed in a wide range of applications, e.g. self-driving cars. Recently, the robustness of skeleton-based HAR methods have been questioned due to their vulnerability to adversarial attacks. We show such threats exist, even when the attacker only has access to the input/output of the model. We propose the very first black-box adversarial attack approach in skeleton-based HAR called BASAR.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-11-21T09:51:28Z)
• An Ordinal Latent Variable Model of Conflict Intensity [59.49424978353101]
  The Goldstein scale is a widely-used expert-based measure that scores events on a conflictual-cooperative scale. This paper takes a latent variable-based approach to measuring conflict intensity.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-10-08T08:59:17Z)
• Formulating Robustness Against Unforeseen Attacks [34.302333899025044]
  This paper focuses on the scenario where there is a mismatch in the threat model assumed by the defense during training. We ask the question: if the learner trains against a specific "source" threat model, when can we expect robustness to generalize to a stronger unknown "target" threat model during test-time? We propose adversarial training with variation regularization (AT-VR) which reduces variation of the feature extractor across the source threat model during training.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-04-28T21:03:36Z)
• Predicting Terrorist Attacks in the United States using Localized News Data [13.164412455321907]
  Terrorism is a major problem worldwide, causing thousands of fatalities and billions of dollars in damage every year. We present a set of machine learning models that learn from localized news data in order to predict whether a terrorist attack will occur on a given calendar date and in a given state. The best model--a Random Forest that learns from a novel variable-length moving average representation of the feature space--scores $>.667$ on four of the five states that were impacted most by terrorism between 2015 and 2018.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-01-12T03:56:15Z)
• Formalizing and Estimating Distribution Inference Risks [11.650381752104298]
  We propose a formal and general definition of property inference attacks. Our results show that inexpensive attacks are as effective as expensive meta-classifier attacks. We extend the state-of-the-art property inference attack to work on convolutional neural networks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-09-13T14:54:39Z)
• Adversarial Robustness through the Lens of Causality [105.51753064807014]
  adversarial vulnerability of deep neural networks has attracted significant attention in machine learning. We propose to incorporate causality into mitigating adversarial vulnerability. Our method can be seen as the first attempt to leverage causality for mitigating adversarial vulnerability.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-06-11T06:55:02Z)
• Towards Adversarial Patch Analysis and Certified Defense against Crowd Counting [61.99564267735242]
  Crowd counting has drawn much attention due to its importance in safety-critical surveillance systems. Recent studies have demonstrated that deep neural network (DNN) methods are vulnerable to adversarial attacks. We propose a robust attack strategy called Adversarial Patch Attack with Momentum to evaluate the robustness of crowd counting models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-04-22T05:10:55Z)
• Learning to Attack: Towards Textual Adversarial Attacking in Real-world Situations [81.82518920087175]
  Adversarial attacking aims to fool deep neural networks with adversarial examples. We propose a reinforcement learning based attack model, which can learn from attack history and launch attacks more efficiently.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-09-19T09:12:24Z)
• Extending Adversarial Attacks to Produce Adversarial Class Probability Distributions [1.439518478021091]
  We show that we can approximate any probability distribution for the classes while maintaining a high fooling rate. Our results demonstrate that we can closely approximate any probability distribution for the classes while maintaining a high fooling rate.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-04-14T09:39:02Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.