MLPerfTM HPC: A Holistic Benchmark Suite for Scientific Machine Learning on HPC Systems

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2110.11466v1
• Date: Thu, 21 Oct 2021 20:30:12 GMT
• Title: MLPerfTM HPC: A Holistic Benchmark Suite for Scientific Machine Learning on HPC Systems
• Authors: Steven Farrell, Murali Emani, Jacob Balma, Lukas Drescher, Aleksandr Drozd, Andreas Fink, Geoffrey Fox, David Kanter, Thorsten Kurth, Peter Mattson, Dawei Mu, Amit Ruhela, Kento Sato, Koichi Shirahata, Tsuguchika Tabaru, Aristeidis Tsaris, Jan Balewski, Ben Cumming, Takumi Danjo, Jens Domke, Takaaki Fukai, Naoto Fukumoto, Tatsuya Fukushi, Balazs Gerofi, Takumi Honda, Toshiyuki Imamura, Akihiko Kasagi, Kentaro Kawakami, Shuhei Kudo, Akiyoshi Kuroda, Maxime Martinasso, Satoshi Matsuoka, Henrique Mendonc, Kazuki Minami, Prabhat Ram, Takashi Sawada, Mallikarjun Shankar, Tom St. John, Akihiro Tabuchi, Venkatram Vishwanath, Mohamed Wahib, Masafumi Yamazaki, Junqi Yin
• Abstract summary: We introduceerf HPC, a benchmark suite of scientific machine learning training applications driven by the MLCommonsTM Association. We develop a systematic framework for their joint analysis and compare them in terms of data staging, algorithmic convergence, and compute performance. We conclude by characterizing each benchmark with respect to low-level memory, I/O, and network behavior.
• Score: 32.621917787044396
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Scientific communities are increasingly adopting machine learning and deep learning models in their applications to accelerate scientific insights. High performance computing systems are pushing the frontiers of performance with a rich diversity of hardware resources and massive scale-out capabilities. There is a critical need to understand fair and effective benchmarking of machine learning applications that are representative of real-world scientific use cases. MLPerfTM is a community-driven standard to benchmark machine learning workloads, focusing on end-to-end performance metrics. In this paper, we introduce MLPerf HPC, a benchmark suite of largescale scientific machine learning training applications, driven by the MLCommonsTM Association. We present the results from the first submission round including a diverse set of some of the world's largest HPC systems. We develop a systematic framework for their joint analysis and compare them in terms of data staging, algorithmic convergence, and compute performance. As a result, we gain a quantitative understanding of optimizations on different subsystems such as staging and on-node loading of data, compute-unit utilization, and communication scheduling enabling overall > 10x (end-to-end) performance improvements through system scaling. Notably, our analysis shows a scale-dependent interplay between the dataset size, a system's memory hierarchy, and training convergence that underlines the importance of near compute storage. To overcome the data-parallel scalability challenge at large batch sizes, we discuss specific learning techniques and hybrid data-and-model parallelism that are effective on large systems. We conclude by characterizing each benchmark with respect to low-level memory, I/O, and network behavior to parameterize extended roofline performance models in future rounds.

Related papers

• Performance Modeling and Workload Analysis of Distributed Large Language Model Training and Inference [2.2231908139555734]
  We propose a general performance modeling methodology and workload analysis of distributed LLM training and inference. We validate our performance predictions with published data from literature and relevant industry vendors (e.g., NVIDIA)
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-07-19T19:49:05Z)
• In Situ Framework for Coupling Simulation and Machine Learning with Application to CFD [51.04126395480625]
  Recent years have seen many successful applications of machine learning (ML) to facilitate fluid dynamic computations. As simulations grow, generating new training datasets for traditional offline learning creates I/O and storage bottlenecks. This work offers a solution by simplifying this coupling and enabling in situ training and inference on heterogeneous clusters.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-06-22T14:07:54Z)
• Machine Learning Capability: A standardized metric using case difficulty with applications to individualized deployment of supervised machine learning [2.2060666847121864]
  Model evaluation is a critical component in supervised machine learning classification analyses. Items Response Theory (IRT) and Computer Adaptive Testing (CAT) with machine learning can benchmark datasets independent of the end-classification results.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-02-09T00:38:42Z)
• Machine Learning Training on a Real Processing-in-Memory System [9.286176889576996]
  Training machine learning algorithms is a computationally intensive process, which is frequently memory-bound. Memory-centric computing systems with processing-in-memory capabilities can alleviate this data movement bottleneck. Our work is the first one to evaluate training of machine learning algorithms on a real-world general-purpose PIM architecture.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-06-13T10:20:23Z)
• SOLIS -- The MLOps journey from data acquisition to actionable insights [62.997667081978825]
  In this paper we present a unified deployment pipeline and freedom-to-operate approach that supports all requirements while using basic cross-platform tensor framework and script language engines. This approach however does not supply the needed procedures and pipelines for the actual deployment of machine learning capabilities in real production grade systems.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-12-22T14:45:37Z)
• Scalable Graph Embedding LearningOn A Single GPU [18.142879223260785]
  We introduce a hybrid CPU-GPU framework that addresses the challenges of learning embedding of large-scale graphs. We show that our system can scale training to datasets with an order of magnitude greater than a single machine's total memory capacity.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-10-13T19:09:33Z)
• An Extensible Benchmark Suite for Learning to Simulate Physical Systems [60.249111272844374]
  We introduce a set of benchmark problems to take a step towards unified benchmarks and evaluation protocols. We propose four representative physical systems, as well as a collection of both widely used classical time-based and representative data-driven methods.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-08-09T17:39:09Z)
• The Benchmark Lottery [114.43978017484893]
  "A benchmark lottery" describes the overall fragility of the machine learning benchmarking process. We show that the relative performance of algorithms may be altered significantly simply by choosing different benchmark tasks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-07-14T21:08:30Z)
• Model-Based Deep Learning [155.063817656602]
  Signal processing, communications, and control have traditionally relied on classical statistical modeling techniques. Deep neural networks (DNNs) use generic architectures which learn to operate from data, and demonstrate excellent performance. We are interested in hybrid techniques that combine principled mathematical models with data-driven systems to benefit from the advantages of both approaches.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-12-15T16:29:49Z)
• A Survey on Large-scale Machine Learning [67.6997613600942]
  Machine learning can provide deep insights into data, allowing machines to make high-quality predictions. Most sophisticated machine learning approaches suffer from huge time costs when operating on large-scale data. Large-scale Machine Learning aims to learn patterns from big data with comparable performance efficiently.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-08-10T06:07:52Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.