Bayesian Sequential Optimal Experimental Design for Nonlinear Models Using Policy Gradient Reinforcement Learning

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2110.15335v1
• Date: Thu, 28 Oct 2021 17:47:31 GMT
• Title: Bayesian Sequential Optimal Experimental Design for Nonlinear Models Using Policy Gradient Reinforcement Learning
• Authors: Wanggang Shen, Xun Huan
• Abstract summary: We formulate this sequential optimal experimental design (sOED) problem as a finite-horizon partially observable Markov decision process (POMDP) It is built to accommodate continuous random variables, general non-Gaussian posteriors, and expensive nonlinear forward models. We solve for the sOED policy numerically via policy gradient (PG) methods from reinforcement learning, and derive and prove the PG expression for sOED. The overall PG-sOED method is validated on a linear-Gaussian benchmark, and its advantages over batch and greedy designs are demonstrated through a contaminant source inversion problem in a
• Score: 0.0
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: We present a mathematical framework and computational methods to optimally design a finite number of sequential experiments. We formulate this sequential optimal experimental design (sOED) problem as a finite-horizon partially observable Markov decision process (POMDP) in a Bayesian setting and with information-theoretic utilities. It is built to accommodate continuous random variables, general non-Gaussian posteriors, and expensive nonlinear forward models. sOED then seeks an optimal design policy that incorporates elements of both feedback and lookahead, generalizing the suboptimal batch and greedy designs. We solve for the sOED policy numerically via policy gradient (PG) methods from reinforcement learning, and derive and prove the PG expression for sOED. Adopting an actor-critic approach, we parameterize the policy and value functions using deep neural networks and improve them using gradient estimates produced from simulated episodes of designs and observations. The overall PG-sOED method is validated on a linear-Gaussian benchmark, and its advantages over batch and greedy designs are demonstrated through a contaminant source inversion problem in a convection-diffusion field.

Related papers

• Variational Bayesian Optimal Experimental Design with Normalizing Flows [0.837622912636323]
  Variational OED estimates a lower bound of the EIG without likelihood evaluations. We introduce the use of normalizing flows for representing variational distributions in vOED. We show that a composition of 4--5 layers is able to achieve lower EIG estimation bias.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-04-08T14:44:21Z)
• Enhancing Gaussian Process Surrogates for Optimization and Posterior Approximation via Random Exploration [2.984929040246293]
  novel noise-free Bayesian optimization strategies that rely on a random exploration step to enhance the accuracy of Gaussian process surrogate models. New algorithms retain the ease of implementation of the classical GP-UCB, but an additional exploration step facilitates their convergence.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-01-30T14:16:06Z)
• Stochastic Gradient Descent for Gaussian Processes Done Right [86.83678041846971]
  We show that when emphdone right -- by which we mean using specific insights from optimisation and kernel communities -- gradient descent is highly effective. We introduce a emphstochastic dual descent algorithm, explain its design in an intuitive manner and illustrate the design choices. Our method places Gaussian process regression on par with state-of-the-art graph neural networks for molecular binding affinity prediction.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-31T16:15:13Z)
• Optimizing Solution-Samplers for Combinatorial Problems: The Landscape of Policy-Gradient Methods [52.0617030129699]
  We introduce a novel theoretical framework for analyzing the effectiveness of DeepMatching Networks and Reinforcement Learning methods. Our main contribution holds for a broad class of problems including Max-and Min-Cut, Max-$k$-Bipartite-Bi, Maximum-Weight-Bipartite-Bi, and Traveling Salesman Problem. As a byproduct of our analysis we introduce a novel regularization process over vanilla descent and provide theoretical and experimental evidence that it helps address vanishing-gradient issues and escape bad stationary points.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-08T23:39:38Z)
• Variational Sequential Optimal Experimental Design using Reinforcement Learning [0.0]
  We introduce variational sequential Optimal Experimental Design (vsOED), a new method for optimally designing a finite sequence of experiments under a Bayesian framework and with information-gain utilities. Our vsOED results indicate substantially improved sample efficiency and reduced number of forward model simulations compared to previous sequential design algorithms.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-06-17T21:47:19Z)
• Variational Linearized Laplace Approximation for Bayesian Deep Learning [11.22428369342346]
  We propose a new method for approximating Linearized Laplace Approximation (LLA) using a variational sparse Gaussian Process (GP) Our method is based on the dual RKHS formulation of GPs and retains, as the predictive mean, the output of the original DNN. It allows for efficient optimization, which results in sub-linear training time in the size of the training dataset.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-02-24T10:32:30Z)
• Stochastic Learning Approach to Binary Optimization for Optimal Design of Experiments [0.0]
  We present a novel approach to binary optimization for optimal experimental design (OED) for Bayesian inverse problems governed by mathematical models such as partial differential equations. The OED utility function, namely, the regularized optimality gradient, is cast into an objective function in the form of an expectation over a Bernoulli distribution. The objective is then solved by using a probabilistic optimization routine to find an optimal observational policy.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-01-15T03:54:12Z)
• Zeroth-Order Hybrid Gradient Descent: Towards A Principled Black-Box Optimization Framework [100.36569795440889]
  This work is on the iteration of zero-th-order (ZO) optimization which does not require first-order information. We show that with a graceful design in coordinate importance sampling, the proposed ZO optimization method is efficient both in terms of complexity as well as as function query cost.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-12-21T17:29:58Z)
• An AI-Assisted Design Method for Topology Optimization Without Pre-Optimized Training Data [68.8204255655161]
  An AI-assisted design method based on topology optimization is presented, which is able to obtain optimized designs in a direct way. Designs are provided by an artificial neural network, the predictor, on the basis of boundary conditions and degree of filling as input data.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-12-11T14:33:27Z)
• Pathwise Conditioning of Gaussian Processes [72.61885354624604]
  Conventional approaches for simulating Gaussian process posteriors view samples as draws from marginal distributions of process values at finite sets of input locations. This distribution-centric characterization leads to generative strategies that scale cubically in the size of the desired random vector. We show how this pathwise interpretation of conditioning gives rise to a general family of approximations that lend themselves to efficiently sampling Gaussian process posteriors.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-11-08T17:09:37Z)
• Optimal Bayesian experimental design for subsurface flow problems [77.34726150561087]
  We propose a novel approach for development of chaos expansion (PCE) surrogate model for the design utility function. This novel technique enables the derivation of a reasonable quality response surface for the targeted objective function with a computational budget comparable to several single-point evaluations.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-08-10T09:42:59Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.