Soros, Child Sacrifices, and 5G: Understanding the Spread of Conspiracy
Theories on Web Communities
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2111.02187v1
- Date: Wed, 3 Nov 2021 12:52:10 GMT
- Title: Soros, Child Sacrifices, and 5G: Understanding the Spread of Conspiracy
Theories on Web Communities
- Authors: Pujan Paudel, Jeremy Blackburn, Emiliano De Cristofaro, Savvas
Zannettou, and Gianluca Stringhini
- Abstract summary: We find 66k posts and 277k comments on Reddit, and 379k tweets discussing conspiracy theories.
Our analysis sheds light on how conspiracy theories are discussed and spread online, while highlighting multiple challenges in mitigating them.
- Score: 11.319938541673578
- License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
- Abstract: This paper presents a multi-platform computational pipeline geared to
identify social media posts discussing (known) conspiracy theories. We use 189
conspiracy claims collected by Snopes, and find 66k posts and 277k comments on
Reddit, and 379k tweets discussing them. Then, we study how conspiracies are
discussed on different Web communities and which ones are particularly
influential in driving the discussion about them. Our analysis sheds light on
how conspiracy theories are discussed and spread online, while highlighting
multiple challenges in mitigating them.
Related papers
- Googling the Big Lie: Search Engines, News Media, and the US 2020 Election Conspiracy [41.94295877935867]
The Big Lie theory that the US 2020 presidential election was fraudulent remained a prominent part of the media agenda months after the election.
We investigate how search engines provided news on this conspiracy by conducting a large-scale algorithm audit.
We find that simply denying the conspiracy is the largest debunking strategy across all search engines.
While Google has a strong mainstreaming effect on articles explicitly focused on the Big Lie, DuckDuckGo and Bing display, depending on the location, a large share of articles either supporting the conspiracy or failing to debunk it.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-08-30T23:10:37Z) - The Conspiracy Money Machine: Uncovering Telegram's Conspiracy Channels and their Profit Model [50.80312055220701]
We discover that conspiracy channels can be clustered into four distinct communities comprising over 17,000 channels.
We find conspiracy theorists leverage e-commerce platforms to sell questionable products or lucratively promote them through affiliate links.
We conclude that this business involves hundreds of thousands of donors and generates a turnover of almost $66 million.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-10-24T16:25:52Z) - YouNICon: YouTube's CommuNIty of Conspiracy Videos [7.135697290631831]
YOUNICON is a dataset with a large collection of videos from suspicious channels that were identified to contain conspiracy theories.
This paper seeks to develop a dataset, YOUNICON, to enable researchers to perform conspiracy theory detection as well as classification of videos with conspiracy theories into different topics.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-04-11T15:20:51Z) - A Golden Age: Conspiracy Theories' Relationship with Misinformation
Outlets, News Media, and the Wider Internet [6.917588580148212]
We identify and publish a set of 755 different conspiracy theory websites dedicated to five conspiracy theories.
We find that each set often hyperlinks to the same external domains, with COVID and QAnon conspiracy theory websites having the largest amount of shared connections.
Examining the role of news media, we find that not only do outlets known for spreading misinformation hyperlink to our set of conspiracy theory websites more often than authentic news websites.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-01-26T00:20:02Z) - Where the Earth is flat and 9/11 is an inside job: A comparative
algorithm audit of conspiratorial information in web search results [62.997667081978825]
We examine the distribution of conspiratorial information in search results across five search engines: Google, Bing, DuckDuckGo, Yahoo and Yandex.
We find that all search engines except Google consistently displayed conspiracy-promoting results and returned links to conspiracy-dedicated websites in their top results.
Most conspiracy-promoting results came from social media and conspiracy-dedicated websites while conspiracy-debunking information was shared by scientific websites and, to a lesser extent, legacy media.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-12-02T14:29:21Z) - Comparing the Language of QAnon-related content on Parler, Gab, and
Twitter [68.8204255655161]
Parler, a "free speech" platform popular with conservatives, was taken offline in January 2021 due to the lack of moderation of hateful and QAnon- and other conspiracy-related content.
We compare posts with the hashtag #QAnon on Parler over a month-long period with posts on Twitter and Gab.
Gab has the highest proportion of #QAnon posts with hate terms, and Parler and Twitter are similar in this respect.
On all three platforms, posts mentioning female political figures, Democrats, or Donald Trump have more anti-social language than posts mentioning male politicians, Republicans, or
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-11-22T11:19:15Z) - The Truth is Out There: Investigating Conspiracy Theories in Text
Generation [66.01545519772527]
We investigate the propensity for language models to generate conspiracy theory text.
Our study focuses on testing these models for the elicitation of conspiracy theories.
We introduce a new dataset consisting of conspiracy theory topics, machine-generated conspiracy theories, and human-written conspiracy theories.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-01-02T05:47:39Z) - An automated pipeline for the discovery of conspiracy and conspiracy
theory narrative frameworks: Bridgegate, Pizzagate and storytelling on the
web [0.0]
We present an automated pipeline for the discovery and description of the generative narrative frameworks of conspiracy theories on social media.
We base this work on two separate repositories of posts and news articles describing the well-known conspiracy theory Pizzagate from 2016.
We show how the Pizzagate framework relies on the conspiracy theorists' interpretation of "hidden knowledge" to link otherwise unlinked domains of human interaction.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-08-23T05:14:38Z) - Echo Chambers on Social Media: A comparative analysis [64.2256216637683]
We introduce an operational definition of echo chambers and perform a massive comparative analysis on 1B pieces of contents produced by 1M users on four social media platforms.
We infer the leaning of users about controversial topics and reconstruct their interaction networks by analyzing different features.
We find support for the hypothesis that platforms implementing news feed algorithms like Facebook may elicit the emergence of echo-chambers.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-04-20T20:00:27Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.