Googling the Big Lie: Search Engines, News Media, and the US 2020 Election Conspiracy

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2409.10531v1
• Date: Fri, 30 Aug 2024 23:10:37 GMT
• Title: Googling the Big Lie: Search Engines, News Media, and the US 2020 Election Conspiracy
• Authors: Ernesto de León, Mykola Makhortykh, Aleksandra Urman, Roberto Ulloa,
• Abstract summary: The Big Lie theory that the US 2020 presidential election was fraudulent remained a prominent part of the media agenda months after the election. We investigate how search engines provided news on this conspiracy by conducting a large-scale algorithm audit. We find that simply denying the conspiracy is the largest debunking strategy across all search engines. While Google has a strong mainstreaming effect on articles explicitly focused on the Big Lie, DuckDuckGo and Bing display, depending on the location, a large share of articles either supporting the conspiracy or failing to debunk it.
• Score: 41.94295877935867
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: The conspiracy theory that the US 2020 presidential election was fraudulent - the Big Lie - remained a prominent part of the media agenda months after the election. Whether and how search engines prioritized news stories that sought to thoroughly debunk the claims, provide a simple negation, or support the conspiracy is crucial for understanding information exposure on the topic. We investigate how search engines provided news on this conspiracy by conducting a large-scale algorithm audit evaluating differences between three search engines (Google, DuckDuckGo, and Bing), across three locations (Ohio, California, and the UK), and using eleven search queries. Results show that simply denying the conspiracy is the largest debunking strategy across all search engines. While Google has a strong mainstreaming effect on articles explicitly focused on the Big Lie - providing thorough debunks and alternative explanations - DuckDuckGo and Bing display, depending on the location, a large share of articles either supporting the conspiracy or failing to debunk it. Lastly, we find that niche ideologically driven search queries (e.g., "sharpie marker ballots Arizona") do not lead to more conspiracy-supportive material. Instead, content supporting the conspiracy is largely a product of broader ideology-agnostic search queries (e.g., "voter fraud 2020").

Related papers

• The Conspiracy Money Machine: Uncovering Telegram's Conspiracy Channels and their Profit Model [50.80312055220701]
  We discover that conspiracy channels can be clustered into four distinct communities comprising over 17,000 channels. We find conspiracy theorists leverage e-commerce platforms to sell questionable products or lucratively promote them through affiliate links. We conclude that this business involves hundreds of thousands of donors and generates a turnover of almost $66 million.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-24T16:25:52Z)
• A Golden Age: Conspiracy Theories' Relationship with Misinformation Outlets, News Media, and the Wider Internet [6.917588580148212]
  We identify and publish a set of 755 different conspiracy theory websites dedicated to five conspiracy theories. We find that each set often hyperlinks to the same external domains, with COVID and QAnon conspiracy theory websites having the largest amount of shared connections. Examining the role of news media, we find that not only do outlets known for spreading misinformation hyperlink to our set of conspiracy theory websites more often than authentic news websites.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-01-26T00:20:02Z)
• Novelty in news search: a longitudinal study of the 2020 US elections [62.997667081978825]
  We analyze novelty, a measurement of new items that emerge in the top news search results. We find more new items emerging for election related queries compared to topical or stable queries. We argue that such imbalances affect the visibility of political candidates in news searches during electoral periods.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-11-09T08:42:37Z)
• Where the Earth is flat and 9/11 is an inside job: A comparative algorithm audit of conspiratorial information in web search results [62.997667081978825]
  We examine the distribution of conspiratorial information in search results across five search engines: Google, Bing, DuckDuckGo, Yahoo and Yandex. We find that all search engines except Google consistently displayed conspiracy-promoting results and returned links to conspiracy-dedicated websites in their top results. Most conspiracy-promoting results came from social media and conspiracy-dedicated websites while conspiracy-debunking information was shared by scientific websites and, to a lesser extent, legacy media.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-12-02T14:29:21Z)
• Soros, Child Sacrifices, and 5G: Understanding the Spread of Conspiracy Theories on Web Communities [11.319938541673578]
  We find 66k posts and 277k comments on Reddit, and 379k tweets discussing conspiracy theories. Our analysis sheds light on how conspiracy theories are discussed and spread online, while highlighting multiple challenges in mitigating them.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-11-03T12:52:10Z)
• The Matter of Chance: Auditing Web Search Results Related to the 2020 U.S. Presidential Primary Elections Across Six Search Engines [68.8204255655161]
  We look at the text search results for "us elections", "donald trump", "joe biden" and "bernie sanders" queries on Google, Baidu, Bing, DuckDuckGo, Yahoo, and Yandex. Our findings indicate substantial differences in the search results between search engines and multiple discrepancies within the results generated for different agents.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-05-03T11:18:19Z)
• The Rise and Fall of Fake News sites: A Traffic Analysis [62.51737815926007]
  We investigate the online presence of fake news websites and characterize their behavior in comparison to real news websites. Based on our findings, we build a content-agnostic ML for automatic detection of fake news websites.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-03-16T18:10:22Z)
• A Longitudinal Analysis of YouTube's Promotion of Conspiracy Videos [14.867862489411868]
  Conspiracy theories have flourished on social media, raising concerns that such content is fueling the spread of disinformation, supporting extremist ideologies, and in some cases, leading to violence. Under increased scrutiny and pressure from legislators and the public, YouTube announced efforts to change their recommendation algorithms so that the most egregious conspiracy videos are demoted and demonetized. We have developed a classifier for automatically determining if a video is conspiratorial.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-03-06T17:31:30Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.