Where the Earth is flat and 9/11 is an inside job: A comparative algorithm audit of conspiratorial information in web search results

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2112.01278v2
• Date: Mon, 6 Dec 2021 11:16:16 GMT
• Title: Where the Earth is flat and 9/11 is an inside job: A comparative algorithm audit of conspiratorial information in web search results
• Authors: Aleksandra Urman, Mykola Makhortykh, Roberto Ulloa, Juhi Kulshrestha
• Abstract summary: We examine the distribution of conspiratorial information in search results across five search engines: Google, Bing, DuckDuckGo, Yahoo and Yandex. We find that all search engines except Google consistently displayed conspiracy-promoting results and returned links to conspiracy-dedicated websites in their top results. Most conspiracy-promoting results came from social media and conspiracy-dedicated websites while conspiracy-debunking information was shared by scientific websites and, to a lesser extent, legacy media.
• Score: 62.997667081978825
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Web search engines are important online information intermediaries that are frequently used and highly trusted by the public despite multiple evidence of their outputs being subjected to inaccuracies and biases. One form of such inaccuracy, which so far received little scholarly attention, is the presence of conspiratorial information, namely pages promoting conspiracy theories. We address this gap by conducting a comparative algorithm audit to examine the distribution of conspiratorial information in search results across five search engines: Google, Bing, DuckDuckGo, Yahoo and Yandex. Using a virtual agent-based infrastructure, we systematically collect search outputs for six conspiracy theory-related queries (flat earth, new world order, qanon, 9/11, illuminati, george soros) across three locations (two in the US and one in the UK) and two observation periods (March and May 2021). We find that all search engines except Google consistently displayed conspiracy-promoting results and returned links to conspiracy-dedicated websites in their top results, although the share of such content varied across queries. Most conspiracy-promoting results came from social media and conspiracy-dedicated websites while conspiracy-debunking information was shared by scientific websites and, to a lesser extent, legacy media. The fact that these observations are consistent across different locations and time periods highlight the possibility of some search engines systematically prioritizing conspiracy-promoting content and, thus, amplifying their distribution in the online environments.

Related papers

• Googling the Big Lie: Search Engines, News Media, and the US 2020 Election Conspiracy [41.94295877935867]
  The Big Lie theory that the US 2020 presidential election was fraudulent remained a prominent part of the media agenda months after the election. We investigate how search engines provided news on this conspiracy by conducting a large-scale algorithm audit. We find that simply denying the conspiracy is the largest debunking strategy across all search engines. While Google has a strong mainstreaming effect on articles explicitly focused on the Big Lie, DuckDuckGo and Bing display, depending on the location, a large share of articles either supporting the conspiracy or failing to debunk it.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-08-30T23:10:37Z)
• Unveiling Online Conspiracy Theorists: a Text-Based Approach and Characterization [42.242551342068374]
  We conducted a comprehensive analysis of two distinct X datasets: one comprising users with conspiracy theorizing patterns and another made of users lacking such tendencies. Our findings reveal marked differences in the lexicon and language adopted by conspiracy theorists with respect to other users. We developed a machine learning classifier capable of identifying users who propagate conspiracy theories based on a rich set of 871 features.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-05-21T08:07:38Z)
• Classifying Conspiratorial Narratives At Scale: False Alarms and Erroneous Connections [4.594855794205588]
  This work establishes a general scheme for classifying discussions related to conspiracy theories. We leverage human-labeled ground truth to train a BERT-based model for classifying online CTs. We present the first large-scale classification study using posts from the most active conspiracy-related Reddit forums.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-03-29T20:29:12Z)
• The Conspiracy Money Machine: Uncovering Telegram's Conspiracy Channels and their Profit Model [50.80312055220701]
  We discover that conspiracy channels can be clustered into four distinct communities comprising over 17,000 channels. We find conspiracy theorists leverage e-commerce platforms to sell questionable products or lucratively promote them through affiliate links. We conclude that this business involves hundreds of thousands of donors and generates a turnover of almost $66 million.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-24T16:25:52Z)
• YouNICon: YouTube's CommuNIty of Conspiracy Videos [7.135697290631831]
  YOUNICON is a dataset with a large collection of videos from suspicious channels that were identified to contain conspiracy theories. This paper seeks to develop a dataset, YOUNICON, to enable researchers to perform conspiracy theory detection as well as classification of videos with conspiracy theories into different topics.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-04-11T15:20:51Z)
• A Golden Age: Conspiracy Theories' Relationship with Misinformation Outlets, News Media, and the Wider Internet [6.917588580148212]
  We identify and publish a set of 755 different conspiracy theory websites dedicated to five conspiracy theories. We find that each set often hyperlinks to the same external domains, with COVID and QAnon conspiracy theory websites having the largest amount of shared connections. Examining the role of news media, we find that not only do outlets known for spreading misinformation hyperlink to our set of conspiracy theory websites more often than authentic news websites.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-01-26T00:20:02Z)
• The Matter of Chance: Auditing Web Search Results Related to the 2020 U.S. Presidential Primary Elections Across Six Search Engines [68.8204255655161]
  We look at the text search results for "us elections", "donald trump", "joe biden" and "bernie sanders" queries on Google, Baidu, Bing, DuckDuckGo, Yahoo, and Yandex. Our findings indicate substantial differences in the search results between search engines and multiple discrepancies within the results generated for different agents.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-05-03T11:18:19Z)
• The Truth is Out There: Investigating Conspiracy Theories in Text Generation [66.01545519772527]
  We investigate the propensity for language models to generate conspiracy theory text. Our study focuses on testing these models for the elicitation of conspiracy theories. We introduce a new dataset consisting of conspiracy theory topics, machine-generated conspiracy theories, and human-written conspiracy theories.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-01-02T05:47:39Z)
• An automated pipeline for the discovery of conspiracy and conspiracy theory narrative frameworks: Bridgegate, Pizzagate and storytelling on the web [0.0]
  We present an automated pipeline for the discovery and description of the generative narrative frameworks of conspiracy theories on social media. We base this work on two separate repositories of posts and news articles describing the well-known conspiracy theory Pizzagate from 2016. We show how the Pizzagate framework relies on the conspiracy theorists' interpretation of "hidden knowledge" to link otherwise unlinked domains of human interaction.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-08-23T05:14:38Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.