Whistleblower protection in the digital age -- why 'anonymous' is not enough. Towards an interdisciplinary view of ethical dilemmas

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2111.02825v1
• Date: Thu, 4 Nov 2021 12:42:21 GMT
• Title: Whistleblower protection in the digital age -- why 'anonymous' is not enough. Towards an interdisciplinary view of ethical dilemmas
• Authors: Bettina Berendt and Stefan Schiffner
• Abstract summary: This paper focusses on the process of whistleblowing, an activity with large impacts on democracy and business. Computer science can, for the first time in history, provide for truly anonymous communication. We investigate this in relation to the values and rights of accountability, fairness and data protection. We conclude that to address these questions, whistleblowing and anonymous whistleblowing must rest on three pillars.
• Score: 1.4721615285883427
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
• Abstract: When technology enters applications and processes with a long tradition of controversial societal debate, multi-faceted new ethical and legal questions arise. This paper focusses on the process of whistleblowing, an activity with large impacts on democracy and business. Computer science can, for the first time in history, provide for truly anonymous communication. We investigate this in relation to the values and rights of accountability, fairness and data protection, focusing on opportunities and limitations of the anonymity that can be provided computationally; possible consequences of outsourcing whistleblowing support; and challenges for the interpretation and use of some relevant laws. We conclude that to address these questions, whistleblowing and anonymous whistleblowing must rest on three pillars, forming a 'triangle of whistleblowing protection and incentivisation' that combines anonymity in a formal and technical sense; whistleblower protection through laws; and organisational and political error culture.

Related papers

• Anonymity-washing [0.24999074238880484]
  This paper offers a comprehensive overview of the conditions that enable anonymity-washing.<n>It synthesizes fragmented legal interpretations, technical misunderstandings, and outdated regulatory guidance.<n>Our findings reveal a lack of coherent support for practitioners, contributing to the persistent misuse of pseudonymization.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-05-24T10:24:56Z)
• Reputation Management in the ChatGPT Era [4.485614995478454]
  Generative AI systems often generate outputs about real people, even when not explicitly prompted to do so. This paper considers what legal tools currently exist to protect such individuals, with a particular focus on defamation and data protection law. We conclude by noting the limitations of these individualistic remedies and hint at the need for a more systemic, environmental approach to protecting the infosphere against generative AI.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-12-09T10:17:44Z)
• Assessing Privacy Policies with AI: Ethical, Legal, and Technical Challenges [6.916147439085307]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) can be used to assess privacy policies for users automatically. We explore the challenges of this approach in three pillars, namely technical feasibility, ethical implications, and legal compatibility. Our findings aim to identify potential for future research, and to foster a discussion on the use of LLM technologies.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-10T21:36:35Z)
• Linkage on Security, Privacy and Fairness in Federated Learning: New Balances and New Perspectives [48.48294460952039]
  This survey offers comprehensive descriptions of the privacy, security, and fairness issues in federated learning. We contend that there exists a trade-off between privacy and fairness and between security and sharing.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-16T10:31:45Z)
• Algorithmic Transparency and Participation through the Handoff Lens: Lessons Learned from the U.S. Census Bureau's Adoption of Differential Privacy [1.999925939110439]
  We look at the U.S. Census Bureau's adoption of differential privacy in its updated disclosure avoidance system for the 2020 census. This case study seeks to expand our understanding of how technical shifts implicate values. We present three lessons from this case study toward grounding understandings of algorithmic transparency and participation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-05-29T15:29:16Z)
• Report of the 1st Workshop on Generative AI and Law [78.62063815165968]
  This report presents the takeaways of the inaugural Workshop on Generative AI and Law (GenLaw) A cross-disciplinary group of practitioners and scholars from computer science and law convened to discuss the technical, doctrinal, and policy challenges presented by law for Generative AI.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-11-11T04:13:37Z)
• Having your Privacy Cake and Eating it Too: Platform-supported Auditing of Social Media Algorithms for Public Interest [70.02478301291264]
  Social media platforms curate access to information and opportunities, and so play a critical role in shaping public discourse. Prior studies have used black-box methods to show that these algorithms can lead to biased or discriminatory outcomes. We propose a new method for platform-supported auditing that can meet the goals of the proposed legislation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-07-18T17:32:35Z)
• Ethics of Open Data [0.0]
  This chapter addresses emergent ethical issues in producing, using, curating, and providing services for open data. We begin with a brief overview of what can be thought of as three basic theories of ethics that intersect with dilemmas in openness, accountability, transparency, and fairness in data.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-05-20T18:44:00Z)
• Designing Anonymity [0.0]
  A common goal in creating anonymity is to prevent accountability. imputability can also provide protection against discrimination. In medical, religious or legal matters, this is of fundamental importance.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-10-03T20:26:26Z)
• Fragments of the Past: Curating Peer Support with Perpetrators of Domestic Violence [88.37416552778178]
  We report on a ten-month study where we worked with six support workers and eighteen perpetrators in the design and deployment of Fragments of the Past. We share how crafting digitally-augmented artefacts - 'fragments' - of experiences of desisting from violence can translate messages for motivation and rapport between peers. These insights provide the basis for practical considerations for future network design with challenging populations.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-07-09T22:57:43Z)
• Confronting Abusive Language Online: A Survey from the Ethical and Human Rights Perspective [4.916009028580767]
  We review a large body of NLP research on automatic abuse detection with a new focus on ethical challenges. We highlight the need to examine the broad social impacts of this technology. We identify several opportunities for rights-respecting, socio-technical solutions to detect and confront online abuse.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-12-22T19:27:11Z)
• A vision for global privacy bridges: Technical and legal measures for international data markets [77.34726150561087]
  Despite data protection laws and an acknowledged right to privacy, trading personal information has become a business equated with "trading oil" An open conflict is arising between business demands for data and a desire for privacy. We propose and test a vision of a personal information market with privacy.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-05-13T13:55:50Z)
• Mining Disinformation and Fake News: Concepts, Methods, and Recent Advancements [55.33496599723126]
  disinformation including fake news has become a global phenomenon due to its explosive growth. Despite the recent progress in detecting disinformation and fake news, it is still non-trivial due to its complexity, diversity, multi-modality, and costs of fact-checking or annotation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-01-02T21:01:02Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.