Anonymity-washing

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2505.18627v1
• Date: Sat, 24 May 2025 10:24:56 GMT
• Title: Anonymity-washing
• Authors: Szivia Lestyán, William Letrone, Ludovica Robustelli, Gergely Biczók,
• Abstract summary: This paper offers a comprehensive overview of the conditions that enable anonymity-washing.<n>It synthesizes fragmented legal interpretations, technical misunderstandings, and outdated regulatory guidance.<n>Our findings reveal a lack of coherent support for practitioners, contributing to the persistent misuse of pseudonymization.
• Score: 0.24999074238880484
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
• Abstract: Anonymization is a foundational principle of data privacy regulation, yet its practical application remains riddled with ambiguity and inconsistency. This paper introduces the concept of anonymity-washing -- the misrepresentation of the anonymity level of ``sanitized'' personal data -- as a critical privacy concern. While both legal and technical critiques of anonymization exist, they tend to address isolated aspects of the problem. In contrast, this paper offers a comprehensive overview of the conditions that enable anonymity-washing. It synthesizes fragmented legal interpretations, technical misunderstandings, and outdated regulatory guidance and complements them with a systematic review of national and international resources, including legal cases, data protection authority guidelines, and technical documentation. Our findings reveal a lack of coherent support for practitioners, contributing to the persistent misuse of pseudonymization and obsolete anonymization techniques. We conclude by recommending targeted education, clearer technical guidance, and closer cooperation between regulators, researchers, and industry to bridge the gap between legal norms and technical reality.

Related papers

• Identity Theft in AI Conference Peer Review [50.18240135317708]
  We discuss newly uncovered cases of identity theft in the scientific peer-review process within artificial intelligence (AI) research.<n>We detail how dishonest researchers exploit the peer-review system by creating fraudulent reviewer profiles to manipulate paper evaluations.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-08-06T02:36:52Z)
• Differential Privacy Overview and Fundamental Techniques [63.0409690498569]
  This chapter is meant to be part of the book "Differential Privacy in Artificial Intelligence: From Theory to Practice" It starts by illustrating various attempts to protect data privacy, emphasizing where and why they failed. It then defines the key actors, tasks, and scopes that make up the domain of privacy-preserving data analysis.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-11-07T13:52:11Z)
• Collection, usage and privacy of mobility data in the enterprise and public administrations [55.2480439325792]
  Security measures such as anonymization are needed to protect individuals' privacy. Within our study, we conducted expert interviews to gain insights into practices in the field. We survey privacy-enhancing methods in use, which generally do not comply with state-of-the-art standards of differential privacy.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-07-04T08:29:27Z)
• Open Government Data Programs and Information Privacy Concerns: A Literature Review [0.0]
  Findings suggest contradictions with Fair Information Practices, reidentification risks, conflicts with Open Government Data (OGD) value propositions, and smart city data practices are significant privacy concerns in the literature. Proposed solutions include technical, legal, and procedural measures to mitigate privacy concerns.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-12-14T16:03:49Z)
• A Critical Take on Privacy in a Datafied Society [0.0]
  I analyze several facets of the lack of online privacy and idiosyncrasies exhibited by privacy advocates. I discuss of possible effects of datafication on human behavior, the prevalent market-oriented assumption at the base of online privacy, and some emerging adaptation strategies. A glimpse on the likely problematic future is provided with a discussion on privacy related aspects of EU, UK, and China's proposed generative AI policies.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-08-03T11:45:18Z)
• Advancing Differential Privacy: Where We Are Now and Future Directions for Real-World Deployment [100.1798289103163]
  We present a detailed review of current practices and state-of-the-art methodologies in the field of differential privacy (DP) Key points and high-level contents of the article were originated from the discussions from "Differential Privacy (DP): Challenges Towards the Next Frontier" This article aims to provide a reference point for the algorithmic and design decisions within the realm of privacy, highlighting important challenges and potential research directions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-04-14T05:29:18Z)
• Having your Privacy Cake and Eating it Too: Platform-supported Auditing of Social Media Algorithms for Public Interest [70.02478301291264]
  Social media platforms curate access to information and opportunities, and so play a critical role in shaping public discourse. Prior studies have used black-box methods to show that these algorithms can lead to biased or discriminatory outcomes. We propose a new method for platform-supported auditing that can meet the goals of the proposed legislation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-07-18T17:32:35Z)
• Statistical anonymity: Quantifying reidentification risks without reidentifying users [4.103598036312231]
  Data anonymization is an approach to privacy-preserving data release aimed at preventing participants reidentification. Existing algorithms for enforcing $k$-anonymity in the released data assume that the curator performing the anonymization has complete access to the original data. This paper explores ideas for reducing the trust that must be placed in the curator, while still maintaining a statistical notion of $k$-anonymity.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-01-28T18:12:44Z)
• Distributed Machine Learning and the Semblance of Trust [66.1227776348216]
  Federated Learning (FL) allows the data owner to maintain data governance and perform model training locally without having to share their data. FL and related techniques are often described as privacy-preserving. We explain why this term is not appropriate and outline the risks associated with over-reliance on protocols that were not designed with formal definitions of privacy in mind.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-12-21T08:44:05Z)
• Whistleblower protection in the digital age -- why 'anonymous' is not enough. Towards an interdisciplinary view of ethical dilemmas [1.4721615285883427]
  This paper focusses on the process of whistleblowing, an activity with large impacts on democracy and business. Computer science can, for the first time in history, provide for truly anonymous communication. We investigate this in relation to the values and rights of accountability, fairness and data protection. We conclude that to address these questions, whistleblowing and anonymous whistleblowing must rest on three pillars.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-11-04T12:42:21Z)
• No Intruder, no Validity: Evaluation Criteria for Privacy-Preserving Text Anonymization [0.48733623015338234]
  We argue that researchers and practitioners developing automated text anonymization systems should carefully assess whether their evaluation methods truly reflect the system's ability to protect individuals from being re-identified. We propose TILD, a set of evaluation criteria that comprises an anonymization method's technical performance, the information loss resulting from its anonymization, and the human ability to de-anonymize redacted documents.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-03-16T18:18:29Z)
• A vision for global privacy bridges: Technical and legal measures for international data markets [77.34726150561087]
  Despite data protection laws and an acknowledged right to privacy, trading personal information has become a business equated with "trading oil" An open conflict is arising between business demands for data and a desire for privacy. We propose and test a vision of a personal information market with privacy.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-05-13T13:55:50Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.