Mate! Are You Really Aware? An Explainability-Guided Testing Framework for Robustness of Malware Detectors

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2111.10085v4
• Date: Mon, 27 Nov 2023 23:25:00 GMT
• Title: Mate! Are You Really Aware? An Explainability-Guided Testing Framework for Robustness of Malware Detectors
• Authors: Ruoxi Sun, Minhui Xue, Gareth Tyson, Tian Dong, Shaofeng Li, Shuo Wang, Haojin Zhu, Seyit Camtepe, Surya Nepal
• Abstract summary: We propose an explainability-guided and model-agnostic testing framework for robustness of malware detectors. We then use this framework to test several state-of-the-art malware detectors' abilities to detect manipulated malware. Our findings shed light on the limitations of current malware detectors, as well as how they can be improved.
• Score: 49.34155921877441
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Numerous open-source and commercial malware detectors are available. However, their efficacy is threatened by new adversarial attacks, whereby malware attempts to evade detection, e.g., by performing feature-space manipulation. In this work, we propose an explainability-guided and model-agnostic testing framework for robustness of malware detectors when confronted with adversarial attacks. The framework introduces the concept of Accrued Malicious Magnitude (AMM) to identify which malware features could be manipulated to maximize the likelihood of evading detection. We then use this framework to test several state-of-the-art malware detectors' abilities to detect manipulated malware. We find that (i) commercial antivirus engines are vulnerable to AMM-guided test cases; (ii) the ability of a manipulated malware generated using one detector to evade detection by another detector (i.e., transferability) depends on the overlap of features with large AMM values between the different detectors; and (iii) AMM values effectively measure the fragility of features (i.e., capability of feature-space manipulation to flip the prediction results) and explain the robustness of malware detectors facing evasion attacks. Our findings shed light on the limitations of current malware detectors, as well as how they can be improved.

Related papers

• MASKDROID: Robust Android Malware Detection with Masked Graph Representations [56.09270390096083]
  We propose MASKDROID, a powerful detector with a strong discriminative ability to identify malware. We introduce a masking mechanism into the Graph Neural Network based framework, forcing MASKDROID to recover the whole input graph. This strategy enables the model to understand the malicious semantics and learn more stable representations, enhancing its robustness against adversarial attacks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-09-29T07:22:47Z)
• DRSM: De-Randomized Smoothing on Malware Classifier Providing Certified Robustness [58.23214712926585]
  We develop a certified defense, DRSM (De-Randomized Smoothed MalConv), by redesigning the de-randomized smoothing technique for the domain of malware detection. Specifically, we propose a window ablation scheme to provably limit the impact of adversarial bytes while maximally preserving local structures of the executables. We are the first to offer certified robustness in the realm of static detection of malware executables.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-03-20T17:25:22Z)
• PAD: Towards Principled Adversarial Malware Detection Against Evasion Attacks [17.783849474913726]
  We propose a new adversarial training framework, termed Principled Adversarial Malware Detection (PAD) PAD lays on a learnable convex measurement that quantifies distribution-wise discrete perturbations to protect malware detectors from adversaries. PAD can harden ML-based malware detection against 27 evasion attacks with detection accuracies greater than 83.45%. It matches or outperforms many anti-malware scanners in VirusTotal against realistic adversarial malware.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-02-22T12:24:49Z)
• Multi-view Representation Learning from Malware to Defend Against Adversarial Variants [11.45498656419419]
  We propose Adversarially Robust Multiview Malware Defense (ARMD), a novel multi-view learning framework to improve the robustness of DL-based malware detectors against adversarial variants. Our experiments on three renowned open-source deep learning-based malware detectors across six common malware categories show that ARMD is able to improve the adversarial robustness by up to seven times on these malware detectors.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-10-25T22:25:50Z)
• Adversarial Attacks on Transformers-Based Malware Detectors [0.0]
  Signature-based malware detectors have proven to be insufficient as even a small change in malignant executable code can bypass these signature-based detectors. Our work aims to explore vulnerabilities in the current state of the art malware detectors to adversarial attacks. We train a Transformers-based malware detector, carry out adversarial attacks resulting in a misclassification rate of 23.9% and propose defenses that reduce this misclassification rate to half.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-10-01T22:23:03Z)
• Illusory Attacks: Information-Theoretic Detectability Matters in Adversarial Attacks [76.35478518372692]
  We introduce epsilon-illusory, a novel form of adversarial attack on sequential decision-makers. Compared to existing attacks, we empirically find epsilon-illusory to be significantly harder to detect with automated methods. Our findings suggest the need for better anomaly detectors, as well as effective hardware- and system-level defenses.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-07-20T19:49:09Z)
• Single-Shot Black-Box Adversarial Attacks Against Malware Detectors: A Causal Language Model Approach [5.2424255020469595]
  Adversarial Malware example Generation aims to generate evasive malware variants. Black-box method has gained more attention than white-box methods. In this study, we show that a novel DL-based causal language model enables single-shot evasion.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-12-03T05:29:50Z)
• Being Single Has Benefits. Instance Poisoning to Deceive Malware Classifiers [47.828297621738265]
  We show how an attacker can launch a sophisticated and efficient poisoning attack targeting the dataset used to train a malware classifier. As opposed to other poisoning attacks in the malware detection domain, our attack does not focus on malware families but rather on specific malware instances that contain an implanted trigger. We propose a comprehensive detection approach that could serve as a future sophisticated defense against this newly discovered severe threat.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-10-30T15:27:44Z)
• Adversarial EXEmples: A Survey and Experimental Evaluation of Practical Attacks on Machine Learning for Windows Malware Detection [67.53296659361598]
  adversarial EXEmples can bypass machine learning-based detection by perturbing relatively few input bytes. We develop a unifying framework that does not only encompass and generalize previous attacks against machine-learning models, but also includes three novel attacks. These attacks, named Full DOS, Extend and Shift, inject the adversarial payload by respectively manipulating the DOS header, extending it, and shifting the content of the first section.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-08-17T07:16:57Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.