Link Analysis meets Ontologies: Are Embeddings the Answer?

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2111.11710v1
• Date: Tue, 23 Nov 2021 08:05:43 GMT
• Title: Link Analysis meets Ontologies: Are Embeddings the Answer?
• Authors: Sebastian Me\v{z}nar, Matej Bevec, Nada Lavra\v{c}, Bla\v{z} \v{S}krlj
• Abstract summary: We present a systematic evaluation of whether structure-only link analysis methods can offer a scalable means to detecting possible anomalies. We demonstrate that structure-only link analysis could offer scalable anomaly detection for a subset of the data sets. This is one of the most extensive systematic studies of the applicability of different types of link analysis methods across semantic resources from different domains.
• Score: 0.0
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: The increasing amounts of semantic resources offer valuable storage of human knowledge; however, the probability of wrong entries increases with the increased size. The development of approaches that identify potentially spurious parts of a given knowledge base is thus becoming an increasingly important area of interest. In this work, we present a systematic evaluation of whether structure-only link analysis methods can already offer a scalable means to detecting possible anomalies, as well as potentially interesting novel relation candidates. Evaluating thirteen methods on eight different semantic resources, including Gene Ontology, Food Ontology, Marine Ontology and similar, we demonstrated that structure-only link analysis could offer scalable anomaly detection for a subset of the data sets. Further, we demonstrated that by considering symbolic node embedding, explanations of the predictions (links) could be obtained, making this branch of methods potentially more valuable than the black-box only ones. To our knowledge, this is currently one of the most extensive systematic studies of the applicability of different types of link analysis methods across semantic resources from different domains.

Related papers

• Revisiting Adaptive Cellular Recognition Under Domain Shifts: A Contextual Correspondence View [49.03501451546763]
  We identify the importance of implicit correspondences across biological contexts for exploiting domain-invariant pathological composition. We propose self-adaptive dynamic distillation to secure instance-aware trade-offs across different model constituents.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-07-14T04:41:16Z)
• Ontology Embedding: A Survey of Methods, Applications and Resources [54.3453925775069]
  Ontologies are widely used for representing domain knowledge and meta data. One straightforward solution is to integrate statistical analysis and machine learning. Numerous papers have been published on embedding, but a lack of systematic reviews hinders researchers from gaining a comprehensive understanding of this field.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-16T14:49:19Z)
• Seeing Unseen: Discover Novel Biomedical Concepts via Geometry-Constrained Probabilistic Modeling [53.7117640028211]
  We present a geometry-constrained probabilistic modeling treatment to resolve the identified issues. We incorporate a suite of critical geometric properties to impose proper constraints on the layout of constructed embedding space. A spectral graph-theoretic method is devised to estimate the number of potential novel classes.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-03-02T00:56:05Z)
• Neurosymbolic AI for Reasoning over Knowledge Graphs: A Survey [0.0]
  We survey methods that perform neurosymbolic reasoning tasks on knowledge graphs and propose a novel taxonomy by which we can classify them. Specifically, we propose three major categories: (1) logically-informed embedding approaches, (2) embedding approaches with logical constraints, and (3) rule learning approaches.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-02-14T17:24:30Z)
• Understanding metric-related pitfalls in image analysis validation [59.15220116166561]
  This work provides the first comprehensive common point of access to information on pitfalls related to validation metrics in image analysis. Focusing on biomedical image analysis but with the potential of transfer to other fields, the addressed pitfalls generalize across application domains and are categorized according to a newly created, domain-agnostic taxonomy.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-02-03T14:57:40Z)
• Biologically-informed deep learning models for cancer: fundamental trends for encoding and interpreting oncology data [0.0]
  We provide a structured literature analysis focused on Deep Learning (DL) models used to support inference in cancer biology. The work focuses on how existing models address the need for better dialogue with prior knowledge, biological plausibility and interpretability.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-07-02T12:11:35Z)
• Discriminative Attribution from Counterfactuals [64.94009515033984]
  We present a method for neural network interpretability by combining feature attribution with counterfactual explanations. We show that this method can be used to quantitatively evaluate the performance of feature attribution methods in an objective manner.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-09-28T00:53:34Z)
• Deep Co-Attention Network for Multi-View Subspace Learning [73.3450258002607]
  We propose a deep co-attention network for multi-view subspace learning. It aims to extract both the common information and the complementary information in an adversarial setting. In particular, it uses a novel cross reconstruction loss and leverages the label information to guide the construction of the latent representation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-02-15T18:46:44Z)
• Renormalized Mutual Information for Artificial Scientific Discovery [0.0]
  We derive a well-defined renormalized version of mutual information that allows to estimate the dependence between continuous random variables. This is relevant for feature extraction, where the goal is to produce a low-dimensional effective description of a high-dimensional system.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-05-04T16:43:49Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.