GANORCON: Are Generative Models Useful for Few-shot Segmentation?
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2112.00854v1
- Date: Wed, 1 Dec 2021 22:06:20 GMT
- Title: GANORCON: Are Generative Models Useful for Few-shot Segmentation?
- Authors: Oindrila Saha, Zezhou Cheng and Subhransu Maji
- Abstract summary: GAN representations can be re-purposed for discriminative tasks such as part segmentation, especially when training data is limited.
We present an alternative approach based on contrastive learning and compare their performance on standard few-shot part segmentation benchmarks.
Our experiments reveal that not only do the GAN-based approach offer no significant performance advantage, their multi-step training is complex, nearly an order-of-magnitude slower, and can introduce additional bias.
- Score: 35.79561690868794
- License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
- Abstract: Advances in generative modeling based on GANs has motivated the community to
find their use beyond image generation and editing tasks. In particular,
several recent works have shown that GAN representations can be re-purposed for
discriminative tasks such as part segmentation, especially when training data
is limited. But how do these improvements stack-up against recent advances in
self-supervised learning? Motivated by this we present an alternative approach
based on contrastive learning and compare their performance on standard
few-shot part segmentation benchmarks. Our experiments reveal that not only do
the GAN-based approach offer no significant performance advantage, their
multi-step training is complex, nearly an order-of-magnitude slower, and can
introduce additional bias. These experiments suggest that the inductive biases
of generative models, such as their ability to disentangle shape and texture,
are well captured by standard feed-forward networks trained using contrastive
learning. These experiments suggest that the inductive biases present in
current generative models, such as their ability to disentangle shape and
texture, are well captured by standard feed-forward networks trained using
contrastive learning.
Related papers
- Rejection Sampling IMLE: Designing Priors for Better Few-Shot Image
Synthesis [7.234618871984921]
An emerging area of research aims to learn deep generative models with limited training data.
We propose RS-IMLE, a novel approach that changes the prior distribution used for training.
This leads to substantially higher quality image generation compared to existing GAN and IMLE-based methods.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-09-26T00:19:42Z) - Adversarial Robustification via Text-to-Image Diffusion Models [56.37291240867549]
Adrial robustness has been conventionally believed as a challenging property to encode for neural networks.
We develop a scalable and model-agnostic solution to achieve adversarial robustness without using any data.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-07-26T10:49:14Z) - On the Out of Distribution Robustness of Foundation Models in Medical
Image Segmentation [47.95611203419802]
Foundations for vision and language, pre-trained on extensive sets of natural image and text data, have emerged as a promising approach.
We compare the generalization performance to unseen domains of various pre-trained models after being fine-tuned on the same in-distribution dataset.
We further developed a new Bayesian uncertainty estimation for frozen models and used them as an indicator to characterize the model's performance on out-of-distribution data.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-11-18T14:52:10Z) - Robust Fine-Tuning of Vision-Language Models for Domain Generalization [6.7181844004432385]
Foundation models have impressive zero-shot inference capabilities and robustness under distribution shifts.
We present a new recipe for few-shot fine-tuning of the popular vision-language foundation model CLIP.
Our experimentation demonstrates that, while zero-shot CLIP fails to match performance of trained vision models on more complex benchmarks, few-shot CLIP fine-tuning outperforms its vision-only counterparts.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-11-03T20:50:40Z) - Enhancing Text Generation with Cooperative Training [23.971227375706327]
Most prevailing methods trained generative and discriminative models in isolation, which left them unable to adapt to changes in each other.
We introduce a textitself-consistent learning framework in the text field that involves training a discriminator and generator cooperatively in a closed-loop manner.
Our framework are able to mitigate training instabilities such as mode collapse and non-convergence.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-03-16T04:21:19Z) - Self-Ensembling GAN for Cross-Domain Semantic Segmentation [107.27377745720243]
This paper proposes a self-ensembling generative adversarial network (SE-GAN) exploiting cross-domain data for semantic segmentation.
In SE-GAN, a teacher network and a student network constitute a self-ensembling model for generating semantic segmentation maps, which together with a discriminator, forms a GAN.
Despite its simplicity, we find SE-GAN can significantly boost the performance of adversarial training and enhance the stability of the model.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-12-15T09:50:25Z) - Contrastive Learning for Fair Representations [50.95604482330149]
Trained classification models can unintentionally lead to biased representations and predictions.
Existing debiasing methods for classification models, such as adversarial training, are often expensive to train and difficult to optimise.
We propose a method for mitigating bias by incorporating contrastive learning, in which instances sharing the same class label are encouraged to have similar representations.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-09-22T10:47:51Z) - Self-Damaging Contrastive Learning [92.34124578823977]
Unlabeled data in reality is commonly imbalanced and shows a long-tail distribution.
This paper proposes a principled framework called Self-Damaging Contrastive Learning to automatically balance the representation learning without knowing the classes.
Our experiments show that SDCLR significantly improves not only overall accuracies but also balancedness.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-06-06T00:04:49Z) - Regularizing Generative Adversarial Networks under Limited Data [88.57330330305535]
This work proposes a regularization approach for training robust GAN models on limited data.
We show a connection between the regularized loss and an f-divergence called LeCam-divergence, which we find is more robust under limited training data.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-04-07T17:59:06Z) - Counterfactual Generative Networks [59.080843365828756]
We propose to decompose the image generation process into independent causal mechanisms that we train without direct supervision.
By exploiting appropriate inductive biases, these mechanisms disentangle object shape, object texture, and background.
We show that the counterfactual images can improve out-of-distribution with a marginal drop in performance on the original classification task.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-01-15T10:23:12Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.