The Box Size Confidence Bias Harms Your Object Detector

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2112.01901v1
• Date: Fri, 3 Dec 2021 13:32:04 GMT
• Title: The Box Size Confidence Bias Harms Your Object Detector
• Authors: Johannes Gilg, Torben Teepe, Fabian Herzog, Gerhard Rigoll
• Abstract summary: We show that conditional confidence bias is harming the expected performance of object detectors. Specifically, we demonstrate how to modify the histogram binning calibration to not only avoid performance impairment but also improve performance. We show improvements of up to 0.6 mAP and 0.8 mAP50 without extra data or training.
• Score: 7.445987710491257
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: Countless applications depend on accurate predictions with reliable confidence estimates from modern object detectors. It is well known, however, that neural networks including object detectors produce miscalibrated confidence estimates. Recent work even suggests that detectors' confidence predictions are biased with respect to object size and position, but it is still unclear how this bias relates to the performance of the affected object detectors. We formally prove that the conditional confidence bias is harming the expected performance of object detectors and empirically validate these findings. Specifically, we demonstrate how to modify the histogram binning calibration to not only avoid performance impairment but also improve performance through conditional confidence calibration. We further find that the confidence bias is also present in detections generated on the training data of the detector, which we leverage to perform our de-biasing without using additional data. Moreover, Test Time Augmentation magnifies this bias, which results in even larger performance gains from our calibration method. Finally, we validate our findings on a diverse set of object detection architectures and show improvements of up to 0.6 mAP and 0.8 mAP50 without extra data or training.

Related papers

• Verbalized Confidence Triggers Self-Verification: Emergent Behavior Without Explicit Reasoning Supervision [12.287123198288079]
  Uncertainty calibration is essential for the safe deployment of large language models (LLMs)<n>We find that supervised fine-tuning with scalar confidence labels alone suffices to elicit self-verification behavior of language models.<n>We propose a simple rethinking method that boosts performance via test-time scaling based on calibrated uncertainty.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-06-04T08:56:24Z)
• Confidential Guardian: Cryptographically Prohibiting the Abuse of Model Abstention [65.47632669243657]
  A dishonest institution can exploit mechanisms to discriminate or unjustly deny services under the guise of uncertainty.<n>We demonstrate the practicality of this threat by introducing an uncertainty-inducing attack called Mirage.<n>We propose Confidential Guardian, a framework that analyzes calibration metrics on a reference dataset to detect artificially suppressed confidence.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-05-29T19:47:50Z)
• Uncertainty Estimation for 3D Object Detection via Evidential Learning [63.61283174146648]
  We introduce a framework for quantifying uncertainty in 3D object detection by leveraging an evidential learning loss on Bird's Eye View representations in the 3D detector. We demonstrate both the efficacy and importance of these uncertainty estimates on identifying out-of-distribution scenes, poorly localized objects, and missing (false negative) detections.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-31T13:13:32Z)
• Provably Reliable Conformal Prediction Sets in the Presence of Data Poisoning [53.42244686183879]
  Conformal prediction provides model-agnostic and distribution-free uncertainty quantification. Yet, conformal prediction is not reliable under poisoning attacks where adversaries manipulate both training and calibration data. We propose reliable prediction sets (RPS): the first efficient method for constructing conformal prediction sets with provable reliability guarantees under poisoning.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-13T15:37:11Z)
• Revisiting Confidence Estimation: Towards Reliable Failure Prediction [53.79160907725975]
  We find a general, widely existing but actually-neglected phenomenon that most confidence estimation methods are harmful for detecting misclassification errors. We propose to enlarge the confidence gap by finding flat minima, which yields state-of-the-art failure prediction performance.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-03-05T11:44:14Z)
• Beyond Classification: Definition and Density-based Estimation of Calibration in Object Detection [15.71719154574049]
  We tackle the challenge of defining and estimating calibration error for deep neural networks (DNNs) In particular, we adapt the definition of classification calibration error to handle the nuances associated with object detection. We propose a consistent and differentiable estimator of the detection calibration error, utilizing kernel density estimation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-12-11T18:57:05Z)
• A Review of Uncertainty Calibration in Pretrained Object Detectors [5.440028715314566]
  We investigate the uncertainty calibration properties of different pretrained object detection architectures in a multi-class setting. We propose a framework to ensure a fair, unbiased, and repeatable evaluation. We deliver novel insights into why poor detector calibration emerges.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-10-06T14:06:36Z)
• Sample-dependent Adaptive Temperature Scaling for Improved Calibration [95.7477042886242]
  Post-hoc approach to compensate for neural networks being wrong is to perform temperature scaling. We propose to predict a different temperature value for each input, allowing us to adjust the mismatch between confidence and accuracy. We test our method on the ResNet50 and WideResNet28-10 architectures using the CIFAR10/100 and Tiny-ImageNet datasets.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-07-13T14:13:49Z)
• Confidence Calibration for Intent Detection via Hyperspherical Space and Rebalanced Accuracy-Uncertainty Loss [17.26964140836123]
  In some scenarios, users do not only care about the accuracy but also the confidence of model. We propose a model using the hyperspherical space and rebalanced accuracy-uncertainty loss. Our model outperforms the existing calibration methods and achieves a significant improvement on the calibration metric.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-03-17T12:01:33Z)
• CertainNet: Sampling-free Uncertainty Estimation for Object Detection [65.28989536741658]
  Estimating the uncertainty of a neural network plays a fundamental role in safety-critical settings. In this work, we propose a novel sampling-free uncertainty estimation method for object detection. We call it CertainNet, and it is the first to provide separate uncertainties for each output signal: objectness, class, location and size.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-10-04T17:59:31Z)
• Gradient-Based Quantification of Epistemic Uncertainty for Deep Object Detectors [8.029049649310213]
  We introduce novel gradient-based uncertainty metrics and investigate them for different object detection architectures. Experiments show significant improvements in true positive / false positive discrimination and prediction of intersection over union. We also find improvement over Monte-Carlo dropout uncertainty metrics and further significant boosts by aggregating different sources of uncertainty metrics.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-07-09T16:04:11Z)
• Learning Uncertainty For Safety-Oriented Semantic Segmentation In Autonomous Driving [77.39239190539871]
  We show how uncertainty estimation can be leveraged to enable safety critical image segmentation in autonomous driving. We introduce a new uncertainty measure based on disagreeing predictions as measured by a dissimilarity function. We show experimentally that our proposed approach is much less computationally intensive at inference time than competing methods.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-05-28T09:23:05Z)
• Multivariate Confidence Calibration for Object Detection [7.16879432974126]
  We present a novel framework to measure and calibrate biased confidence estimates of object detection methods. Our approach allows, for the first time, to obtain calibrated confidence estimates with respect to image location and box scale. We show that our developed methods outperform state-of-the-art calibration models for the task of object detection.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-04-28T14:17:41Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.