Using Static and Dynamic Malware features to perform Malware Ascription

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2112.02639v1
• Date: Sun, 5 Dec 2021 18:01:09 GMT
• Title: Using Static and Dynamic Malware features to perform Malware Ascription
• Authors: Jashanpreet Singh Sraw and Keshav Kumar
• Abstract summary: We employ various Static and Dynamic features of malicious executables to classify malware based on their family. We leverage Cuckoo Sandbox and machine learning to make progress in this research.
• Score: 0.0
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Malware ascription is a relatively unexplored area, and it is rather difficult to attribute malware and detect authorship. In this paper, we employ various Static and Dynamic features of malicious executables to classify malware based on their family. We leverage Cuckoo Sandbox and machine learning to make progress in this research. Post analysis, classification is performed using various deep learning and machine learning algorithms. Using the features gathered from VirusTotal (static) and Cuckoo (dynamic) reports, we ran the vectorized data against Multinomial Naive Bayes, Support Vector Machine, and Bagging using Decision Trees as the base estimator. For each classifier, we tuned the hyper-parameters using exhaustive search methods. Our reports can be extremely useful in malware ascription.

Related papers

• MASKDROID: Robust Android Malware Detection with Masked Graph Representations [56.09270390096083]
  We propose MASKDROID, a powerful detector with a strong discriminative ability to identify malware. We introduce a masking mechanism into the Graph Neural Network based framework, forcing MASKDROID to recover the whole input graph. This strategy enables the model to understand the malicious semantics and learn more stable representations, enhancing its robustness against adversarial attacks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-09-29T07:22:47Z)
• EMBERSim: A Large-Scale Databank for Boosting Similarity Search in Malware Analysis [48.5877840394508]
  In recent years there has been a shift from quantifications-based malware detection towards machine learning. We propose to address the deficiencies in the space of similarity research on binary files, starting from EMBER. We enhance EMBER with similarity information as well as malware class tags, to enable further research in the similarity space.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-03T06:58:45Z)
• DRSM: De-Randomized Smoothing on Malware Classifier Providing Certified Robustness [58.23214712926585]
  We develop a certified defense, DRSM (De-Randomized Smoothed MalConv), by redesigning the de-randomized smoothing technique for the domain of malware detection. Specifically, we propose a window ablation scheme to provably limit the impact of adversarial bytes while maximally preserving local structures of the executables. We are the first to offer certified robustness in the realm of static detection of malware executables.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-03-20T17:25:22Z)
• New Datasets for Dynamic Malware Classification [0.0]
  We introduce two new, updated datasets of malicious software, VirusSamples and VirusShare. This paper analyzes multi-class malware classification performance of the balanced and imbalanced version of these two datasets. Results show that Support Vector Machine, achieves the highest score of 94% in the imbalanced VirusSample dataset. XGBoost, one of the most common gradient boosting-based models, achieves the highest score of 90% and 80%.in both versions of the VirusShare dataset.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-11-30T08:31:16Z)
• Mate! Are You Really Aware? An Explainability-Guided Testing Framework for Robustness of Malware Detectors [49.34155921877441]
  We propose an explainability-guided and model-agnostic testing framework for robustness of malware detectors. We then use this framework to test several state-of-the-art malware detectors' abilities to detect manipulated malware. Our findings shed light on the limitations of current malware detectors, as well as how they can be improved.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-11-19T08:02:38Z)
• Evading Malware Classifiers via Monte Carlo Mutant Feature Discovery [23.294653273180472]
  We show how a malicious actor trains a surrogate model to discover binary mutations that cause an instance to be misclassified. Then, mutated malware is sent to the victim model that takes the place of an antivirus API to test whether it can evade detection.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-06-15T03:31:02Z)
• A Novel Malware Detection Mechanism based on Features Extracted from Converted Malware Binary Images [0.22843885788439805]
  We use malware binary images and then extract different features from the same and then employ different ML-classifiers on the dataset thus obtained. We show that this technique is successful in differentiating classes of malware based on the features extracted.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-04-14T06:55:52Z)
• Being Single Has Benefits. Instance Poisoning to Deceive Malware Classifiers [47.828297621738265]
  We show how an attacker can launch a sophisticated and efficient poisoning attack targeting the dataset used to train a malware classifier. As opposed to other poisoning attacks in the malware detection domain, our attack does not focus on malware families but rather on specific malware instances that contain an implanted trigger. We propose a comprehensive detection approach that could serve as a future sophisticated defense against this newly discovered severe threat.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-10-30T15:27:44Z)
• Adversarial EXEmples: A Survey and Experimental Evaluation of Practical Attacks on Machine Learning for Windows Malware Detection [67.53296659361598]
  adversarial EXEmples can bypass machine learning-based detection by perturbing relatively few input bytes. We develop a unifying framework that does not only encompass and generalize previous attacks against machine-learning models, but also includes three novel attacks. These attacks, named Full DOS, Extend and Shift, inject the adversarial payload by respectively manipulating the DOS header, extending it, and shifting the content of the first section.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-08-17T07:16:57Z)
• DAEMON: Dataset-Agnostic Explainable Malware Classification Using Multi-Stage Feature Mining [3.04585143845864]
  Malware classification is the task of determining to which family a new malicious variant belongs. We present DAEMON, a novel dataset-agnostic malware classification tool.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-08-04T21:57:30Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.