Prevalence Threshold and bounds in the Accuracy of Binary Classification Systems

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2112.13289v1
• Date: Sat, 25 Dec 2021 21:22:32 GMT
• Title: Prevalence Threshold and bounds in the Accuracy of Binary Classification Systems
• Authors: Jacques Balayla
• Abstract summary: We show that relative to a perfect accuracy of 1, the positive prevalence threshold ($phi_e$) is a critical point of maximum curvature in the precision-prevalence curve. Though applications are numerous, the ideas herein discussed may be used in computational complexity theory, artificial intelligence, and medical screening.
• Score: 0.0
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: The accuracy of binary classification systems is defined as the proportion of correct predictions - both positive and negative - made by a classification model or computational algorithm. A value between 0 (no accuracy) and 1 (perfect accuracy), the accuracy of a classification model is dependent on several factors, notably: the classification rule or algorithm used, the intrinsic characteristics of the tool used to do the classification, and the relative frequency of the elements being classified. Several accuracy metrics exist, each with its own advantages in different classification scenarios. In this manuscript, we show that relative to a perfect accuracy of 1, the positive prevalence threshold ($\phi_e$), a critical point of maximum curvature in the precision-prevalence curve, bounds the $F{_{\beta}}$ score between 1 and 1.8/1.5/1.2 for $\beta$ values of 0.5/1.0/2.0, respectively; the $F_1$ score between 1 and 1.5, and the Fowlkes-Mallows Index (FM) between 1 and $\sqrt{2} \approx 1.414$. We likewise describe a novel $negative$ prevalence threshold ($\phi_n$), the level of sharpest curvature for the negative predictive value-prevalence curve, such that $\phi_n$ $>$ $\phi_e$. The area between both these thresholds bounds the Matthews Correlation Coefficient (MCC) between $\sqrt{2}/2$ and $\sqrt{2}$. Conversely, the ratio of the maximum possible accuracy to that at any point below the prevalence threshold, $\phi_e$, goes to infinity with decreasing prevalence. Though applications are numerous, the ideas herein discussed may be used in computational complexity theory, artificial intelligence, and medical screening, amongst others. Where computational time is a limiting resource, attaining the prevalence threshold in binary classification systems may be sufficient to yield levels of accuracy comparable to that under maximum prevalence.

Related papers

• Semiparametric conformal prediction [79.6147286161434]
  Risk-sensitive applications require well-calibrated prediction sets over multiple, potentially correlated target variables. We treat the scores as random vectors and aim to construct the prediction set accounting for their joint correlation structure. We report desired coverage and competitive efficiency on a range of real-world regression problems.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-11-04T14:29:02Z)
• Adaptive $k$-nearest neighbor classifier based on the local estimation of the shape operator [49.87315310656657]
  We introduce a new adaptive $k$-nearest neighbours ($kK$-NN) algorithm that explores the local curvature at a sample to adaptively defining the neighborhood size. Results on many real-world datasets indicate that the new $kK$-NN algorithm yields superior balanced accuracy compared to the established $k$-NN method.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-09-08T13:08:45Z)
• Mind the Gap: A Causal Perspective on Bias Amplification in Prediction & Decision-Making [58.06306331390586]
  We introduce the notion of a margin complement, which measures how much a prediction score $S$ changes due to a thresholding operation. We show that under suitable causal assumptions, the influences of $X$ on the prediction score $S$ are equal to the influences of $X$ on the true outcome $Y$.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-05-24T11:22:19Z)
• The Interplay between Distribution Parameters and the Accuracy-Robustness Tradeoff in Classification [0.0]
  Adrial training tends to result in models that are less accurate on natural (unperturbed) examples compared to standard models. This can be attributed to either an algorithmic shortcoming or a fundamental property of the training data distribution. In this work, we focus on the latter case under a binary Gaussian mixture classification problem.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-07-01T06:57:50Z)
• Learning Gaussian Mixtures with Generalised Linear Models: Precise Asymptotics in High-dimensions [79.35722941720734]
  Generalised linear models for multi-class classification problems are one of the fundamental building blocks of modern machine learning tasks. We prove exacts characterising the estimator in high-dimensions via empirical risk minimisation. We discuss how our theory can be applied beyond the scope of synthetic data.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-06-07T16:53:56Z)
• Accuracy and precision of the estimation of the number of missing levels in chaotic spectra using long-range correlations [0.0]
  We study the accuracy and precision for estimating the fraction of observed levels $varphi$ in quantum chaotic spectra through long-range correlations. We use Monte Carlo simulations of the spectra from the diagonalization of Gaussian Orthogonal Ensemble matrices with a definite number of levels randomly taken out to fit the formulas. The precision is generally better for the estimation using the power spectrum of the $delta_n$ as compared to the estimation using the $Delta_3$ statistic.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-11-03T12:42:07Z)
• Developing and Improving Risk Models using Machine-learning Based Algorithms [6.245537312562826]
  The objective of this study is to develop a good risk model for classifying business delinquency. The rationale under the analyses is firstly to obtain good base binary classifiers via regularization. Two model ensembling algorithms including bagging and boosting are performed on the good base classifiers for further model improvement.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-09-09T20:38:00Z)
• Consistent Structured Prediction with Max-Min Margin Markov Networks [84.60515484036239]
  Max-margin methods for binary classification have been extended to the structured prediction setting under the name of max-margin Markov networks ($M3N$) We overcome such limitations by defining the learning problem in terms of a "max-min" margin formulation, naming the resulting method max-min margin Markov networks ($M4N$) Experiments on multi-class classification, ordinal regression, sequence prediction and ranking demonstrate the effectiveness of the proposed method.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-07-02T10:48:42Z)
• Sharp Statistical Guarantees for Adversarially Robust Gaussian Classification [54.22421582955454]
  We provide the first result of the optimal minimax guarantees for the excess risk for adversarially robust classification. Results are stated in terms of the Adversarial Signal-to-Noise Ratio (AdvSNR), which generalizes a similar notion for standard linear classification to the adversarial setting.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-06-29T21:06:52Z)
• A Precise High-Dimensional Asymptotic Theory for Boosting and Minimum-$\ell_1$-Norm Interpolated Classifiers [3.167685495996986]
  This paper establishes a precise high-dimensional theory for boosting on separable data. Under a class of statistical models, we provide an exact analysis of the universality error of boosting. We also explicitly pin down the relation between the boosting test error and the optimal Bayes error.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-02-05T00:24:53Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.