Fake or Genuine? Contextualised Text Representation for Fake Review Detection

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2112.14343v1
• Date: Wed, 29 Dec 2021 00:54:47 GMT
• Title: Fake or Genuine? Contextualised Text Representation for Fake Review Detection
• Authors: Rami Mohawesh, Shuxiang Xu, Matthew Springer, Muna Al-Hawawreh and Sumbal Maqsood
• Abstract summary: This paper proposes a new ensemble model that employs transformer architecture to discover the hidden patterns in a sequence of fake reviews and detect them precisely. The experimental results using semi-real benchmark datasets showed the superiority of the proposed model over state-of-the-art models.
• Score: 0.4724825031148411
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Online reviews have a significant influence on customers' purchasing decisions for any products or services. However, fake reviews can mislead both consumers and companies. Several models have been developed to detect fake reviews using machine learning approaches. Many of these models have some limitations resulting in low accuracy in distinguishing between fake and genuine reviews. These models focused only on linguistic features to detect fake reviews and failed to capture the semantic meaning of the reviews. To deal with this, this paper proposes a new ensemble model that employs transformer architecture to discover the hidden patterns in a sequence of fake reviews and detect them precisely. The proposed approach combines three transformer models to improve the robustness of fake and genuine behaviour profiling and modelling to detect fake reviews. The experimental results using semi-real benchmark datasets showed the superiority of the proposed model over state-of-the-art models.

Related papers

• What Matters in Explanations: Towards Explainable Fake Review Detection Focusing on Transformers [45.55363754551388]
  Customers' reviews and feedback play crucial role on e-commerce platforms like Amazon, Zalando, and eBay. There is a prevailing concern that sellers often post fake or spam reviews to deceive potential customers and manipulate their opinions about a product. We propose an explainable framework for detecting fake reviews with high precision in identifying fraudulent content with explanations.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-07-24T13:26:02Z)
• AiGen-FoodReview: A Multimodal Dataset of Machine-Generated Restaurant Reviews and Images on Social Media [57.70351255180495]
  AiGen-FoodReview is a dataset of 20,144 restaurant review-image pairs divided into authentic and machine-generated. We explore unimodal and multimodal detection models, achieving 99.80% multimodal accuracy with FLAVA. The paper contributes by open-sourcing the dataset and releasing fake review detectors, recommending its use in unimodal and multimodal fake review detection tasks, and evaluating linguistic and visual features in synthetic versus authentic data.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-01-16T20:57:36Z)
• Combat AI With AI: Counteract Machine-Generated Fake Restaurant Reviews on Social Media [77.34726150561087]
  We propose to leverage the high-quality elite Yelp reviews to generate fake reviews from the OpenAI GPT review creator. We apply the model to predict non-elite reviews and identify the patterns across several dimensions. We show that social media platforms are continuously challenged by machine-generated fake reviews.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-02-10T19:40:10Z)
• Online Fake Review Detection Using Supervised Machine Learning And BERT Model [0.0]
  We propose to use BERT (Bidirectional Representation from Transformers) model to extract word embeddings from texts (i.e. reviews) The results indicate that the SVM classifiers outperform the others in terms of accuracy and f1-score with an accuracy of 87.81%.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-01-09T09:40:56Z)
• Voice-Face Homogeneity Tells Deepfake [56.334968246631725]
  Existing detection approaches contribute to exploring the specific artifacts in deepfake videos. We propose to perform the deepfake detection from an unexplored voice-face matching view. Our model obtains significantly improved performance as compared to other state-of-the-art competitors.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-03-04T09:08:50Z)
• Explain, Edit, and Understand: Rethinking User Study Design for Evaluating Model Explanations [97.91630330328815]
  We conduct a crowdsourcing study, where participants interact with deception detection models that have been trained to distinguish between genuine and fake hotel reviews. We observe that for a linear bag-of-words model, participants with access to the feature coefficients during training are able to cause a larger reduction in model confidence in the testing phase when compared to the no-explanation control.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-12-17T18:29:56Z)
• Fake Reviews Detection through Analysis of Linguistic Features [1.609940380983903]
  This paper explores a natural language processing approach to identify fake reviews. We study 15 linguistic features for distinguishing fake and trustworthy online reviews. We were able to discriminate fake from real reviews with high accuracy using these linguistic features.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-10-08T21:16:30Z)
• Context-aware Helpfulness Prediction for Online Product Reviews [34.47368084659301]
  We propose a neural deep learning model that predicts the helpfulness score of a review. This model is based on convolutional neural network (CNN) and a context-aware encoding mechanism. We validated our model on human annotated dataset and the result shows that our model significantly outperforms existing models for helpfulness prediction.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-04-27T18:19:26Z)
• Unsupervised Opinion Summarization with Noising and Denoising [85.49169453434554]
  We create a synthetic dataset from a corpus of user reviews by sampling a review, pretending it is a summary, and generating noisy versions thereof. At test time, the model accepts genuine reviews and generates a summary containing salient opinions, treating those that do not reach consensus as noise.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-04-21T16:54:57Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.