Towards the global vision of engagement of Generation Z at the workplace: Mathematical modeling

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2112.15401v1
• Date: Fri, 31 Dec 2021 12:04:44 GMT
• Title: Towards the global vision of engagement of Generation Z at the workplace: Mathematical modeling
• Authors: Rados{\l}aw A. Kycia, Agnieszka Niemczynowicz, Joanna Nie\.zurawska-Zaj\k{a}c
• Abstract summary: Correlation and cluster analyses were performed on Generation Z engagement surveys at the workplace. The clustering indicates relations between various factors that describe the engagement of employees. The results of this paper can be used in preparing better motivational systems aimed at Generation Z employees.
• Score: 0.0
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: Correlation and cluster analyses (k-Means, Gaussian Mixture Models) were performed on Generation Z engagement surveys at the workplace. The clustering indicates relations between various factors that describe the engagement of employees. The most noticeable factors are a clear statement about the responsibilities at work, and challenging work. These factors are essential in practice. The results of this paper can be used in preparing better motivational systems aimed at Generation Z employees.

Related papers

• From Pre-training Corpora to Large Language Models: What Factors Influence LLM Performance in Causal Discovery Tasks? [51.42906577386907]
  This study explores the factors influencing the performance of Large Language Models (LLMs) in causal discovery tasks. A higher frequency of causal mentions correlates with better model performance, suggesting that extensive exposure to causal information during training enhances the models' causal discovery capabilities.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-07-29T01:45:05Z)
• Task Groupings Regularization: Data-Free Meta-Learning with Heterogeneous Pre-trained Models [83.02797560769285]
  Data-Free Meta-Learning (DFML) aims to derive knowledge from a collection of pre-trained models without accessing their original data. Current methods often overlook the heterogeneity among pre-trained models, which leads to performance degradation due to task conflicts. We propose Task Groupings Regularization, a novel approach that benefits from model heterogeneity by grouping and aligning conflicting tasks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-05-26T13:11:55Z)
• Hacking Task Confounder in Meta-Learning [18.179340061914708]
  We propose a plug-and-play Meta-learning Causal Representation (MetaCRL) to eliminate task confounders. Our work achieves state-of-the-art (SOTA) performance on benchmark datasets.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-12-10T05:33:40Z)
• Inducing Causal Structure for Abstractive Text Summarization [76.1000380429553]
  We introduce a Structural Causal Model (SCM) to induce the underlying causal structure of the summarization data. We propose a Causality Inspired Sequence-to-Sequence model (CI-Seq2Seq) to learn the causal representations that can mimic the causal factors. Experimental results on two widely used text summarization datasets demonstrate the advantages of our approach.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-08-24T16:06:36Z)
• Causal Intervention for Abstractive Related Work Generation [16.7515135295061]
  We propose a novel Causal Intervention Module for Related Work Generation (CaM) We first model the relations among sentence order, document relation, and transitional content in related work generation using a causal graph. We then use do-calculus to derive ordinary conditional probabilities and identify causal effects through CaM.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-05-23T04:48:30Z)
• Target-aware Abstractive Related Work Generation with Contrastive Learning [48.02845973891943]
  The related work section is an important component of a scientific paper, which highlights the contribution of the target paper in the context of the reference papers. Most of the existing related work section generation methods rely on extracting off-the-shelf sentences. We propose an abstractive target-aware related work generator (TAG), which can generate related work sections consisting of new sentences.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-05-26T13:20:51Z)
• Multi-Agent Imitation Learning with Copulas [102.27052968901894]
  Multi-agent imitation learning aims to train multiple agents to perform tasks from demonstrations by learning a mapping between observations and actions. In this paper, we propose to use copula, a powerful statistical tool for capturing dependence among random variables, to explicitly model the correlation and coordination in multi-agent systems. Our proposed model is able to separately learn marginals that capture the local behavioral patterns of each individual agent, as well as a copula function that solely and fully captures the dependence structure among agents.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-07-10T03:49:41Z)
• Generating Related Work [37.161925758727456]
  We model generating related work sections while being cognisant of the motivation behind citing papers. Our model outperforms several strong state-of-the-art summarization and multi-document summarization models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-04-18T00:19:37Z)
• Seating preference analysis for hybrid workplaces [7.446040265524479]
  workplaces are becoming more hybrid (i.e. allowing workers to work between traditional office spaces and elsewhere including from home) Since workplaces are different in design, layout and available facilities, many workers find it difficult to adjust accordingly. One of the key factors that causes this negative work experience is directly linked to the available seating arrangements.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-07-31T02:17:20Z)
• Randomized Entity-wise Factorization for Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learning [59.62721526353915]
  Multi-agent settings in the real world often involve tasks with varying types and quantities of agents and non-agent entities. Our method aims to leverage these commonalities by asking the question: What is the expected utility of each agent when only considering a randomly selected sub-group of its observed entities?''
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-06-07T18:28:41Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.