Effect of Toxic Review Content on Overall Product Sentiment

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2201.02857v1
• Date: Sat, 8 Jan 2022 16:40:38 GMT
• Title: Effect of Toxic Review Content on Overall Product Sentiment
• Authors: Mayukh Mukhopadhyay and Sangeeta Sahney
• Abstract summary: In this study, we collect a balanced data set of review comments from 18 different players segregated into three different sectors from google play-store. We calculate the sentence-level sentiment and toxicity score of individual review content. We observe that comment toxicity negatively influences overall product sentiment but do not exhibit a mediating effect over reviewer score to influence sector-wise relative rating.
• Score: 0.0
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: Toxic contents in online product review are a common phenomenon. A content is perceived to be toxic when it is rude, disrespectful, or unreasonable and make individuals leave the discussion. Machine learning algorithms helps the sell side community to identify such toxic patterns and eventually moderate such inputs. Yet, the extant literature provides fewer information about the sentiment of a prospective consumer on the perception of a product after being exposed to such toxic review content. In this study, we collect a balanced data set of review comments from 18 different players segregated into three different sectors from google play-store. Then we calculate the sentence-level sentiment and toxicity score of individual review content. Finally, we use structural equation modelling to quantitatively study the influence of toxic content on overall product sentiment. We observe that comment toxicity negatively influences overall product sentiment but do not exhibit a mediating effect over reviewer score to influence sector-wise relative rating.

Related papers

• Analytical and Empirical Study of Herding Effects in Recommendation Systems [72.6693986712978]
  We study how to manage product ratings via rating aggregation rules and shortlisted representative reviews. We show that proper recency aware rating aggregation rules can improve the speed of convergence in Amazon and TripAdvisor.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-08-20T14:29:23Z)
• Twits, Toxic Tweets, and Tribal Tendencies: Trends in Politically Polarized Posts on Twitter [5.161088104035108]
  We explore the role that partisanship and affective polarization play in contributing to toxicity on an individual level and a topic level on Twitter/X. After collecting 89.6 million tweets from 43,151 Twitter/X users, we determine how several account-level characteristics, including partisanship, predict how often users post toxic content.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-07-19T17:24:47Z)
• Toxic Comments Hunter : Score Severity of Toxic Comments [0.0]
  In this experiment, we collect various data sets related to toxic comments. Because of the characteristics of comment data, we perform data cleaning and feature extraction operations on it. In terms of model construction, we used the training set to train the models based on TFIDF and finetuned the Bert model.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-02-15T07:35:52Z)
• Annotators with Attitudes: How Annotator Beliefs And Identities Bias Toxic Language Detection [75.54119209776894]
  We investigate the effect of annotator identities (who) and beliefs (why) on toxic language annotations. We consider posts with three characteristics: anti-Black language, African American English dialect, and vulgarity. Our results show strong associations between annotator identity and beliefs and their ratings of toxicity.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-11-15T18:58:20Z)
• SIFN: A Sentiment-aware Interactive Fusion Network for Review-based Item Recommendation [48.1799451277808]
  We propose a Sentiment-aware Interactive Fusion Network (SIFN) for review-based item recommendation. We first encode user/item reviews via BERT and propose a light-weighted sentiment learner to extract semantic features of each review. Then, we propose a sentiment prediction task that guides the sentiment learner to extract sentiment-aware features via explicit sentiment labels.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-08-18T08:04:38Z)
• News consumption and social media regulations policy [70.31753171707005]
  We analyze two social media that enforced opposite moderation methods, Twitter and Gab, to assess the interplay between news consumption and content regulation. Our results show that the presence of moderation pursued by Twitter produces a significant reduction of questionable content. The lack of clear regulation on Gab results in the tendency of the user to engage with both types of content, showing a slight preference for the questionable ones which may account for a dissing/endorsement behavior.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-06-07T19:26:32Z)
• Designing Toxic Content Classification for a Diversity of Perspectives [15.466547856660803]
  We survey 17,280 participants to understand how user expectations for what constitutes toxic content differ across demographics, beliefs, and personal experiences. We find that groups historically at-risk of harassment are more likely to flag a random comment drawn from Reddit, Twitter, or 4chan as toxic. We show how current one-size-fits-all toxicity classification algorithms, like the Perspective API from Jigsaw, can improve in accuracy by 86% on average through personalized model tuning.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-06-04T16:45:15Z)
• Sentiment Analysis on Customer Responses [0.0]
  We present a customer feedback reviews on product, where we utilize opinion mining, text mining and sentiments. This research paper provides you with sentimental analysis of various smart phone opinions on smart phones dividing them Positive, Negative and Neutral Behaviour.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-07-05T04:50:40Z)
• Information Consumption and Social Response in a Segregated Environment: the Case of Gab [74.5095691235917]
  This work provides a characterization of the interaction patterns within Gab around the COVID-19 topic. We find that there are no strong statistical differences in the social response to questionable and reliable content. Our results provide insights toward the understanding of coordinated inauthentic behavior and on the early-warning of information operation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-06-03T11:34:25Z)
• A Unified Dual-view Model for Review Summarization and Sentiment Classification with Inconsistency Loss [51.448615489097236]
  Acquiring accurate summarization and sentiment from user reviews is an essential component of modern e-commerce platforms. We propose a novel dual-view model that jointly improves the performance of these two tasks. Experiment results on four real-world datasets from different domains demonstrate the effectiveness of our model.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-06-02T13:34:11Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.